Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 12:27

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

To be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club, one

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 1111
Location: London
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

To be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club, one [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2007, 15:19
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
To be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club, one must have a net worth of over ten million dollars and must not have any connections to the entertainment industry. Robert Chase, the publishing magnate, has a net worth of 5 billion dollars and chase has not financed any Hollywood movies, so he must be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club.

The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is the part of evidence in support of this argument; the second is the conclusion that could not be drawn from all evidence that the argument contains.

(B) The first is the first-evidence that supports this argument; the second is the mainpoint that must be drawn from all evidence that the argument includes.

(C) The first is the one fact of two that argument includes; the second is the conclusion that could be drawn from this passage.

(D) The first is the background that is necessary for this argument; the second is the conclusion that is not drawn only from the first.

(E) The first is the cause that the argument includes; the second is the effect that can be drawn only from this cause.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 647
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Re: Boldface CR [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2007, 19:02
Ravshonbek wrote:
To be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club, one must have a net worth of over ten million dollars and must not have any connections to the entertainment industry. Robert Chase, the publishing magnate, has a net worth of 5 billion dollars and chase has not financed any Hollywood movies, so he must be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club.

The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is the part of evidence in support of this argument; the second is the conclusion that could not be drawn from all evidence that the argument contains.

(B) The first is the first-evidence that supports this argument; the second is the mainpoint that must be drawn from all evidence that the argument includes.

(C) The first is the one fact of two that argument includes; the second is the conclusion that could be drawn from this passage.

(D) The first is the background that is necessary for this argument; the second is the conclusion that is not drawn only from the first.

(E) The first is the cause that the argument includes; the second is the effect that can be drawn only from this cause.


Will go for 'D'
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 108
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: Boldface CR [#permalink] New post 31 Dec 2007, 18:11
Ravshonbek wrote:
To be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club, one must have a net worth of over ten million dollars and must not have any connections to the entertainment industry. Robert Chase, the publishing magnate, has a net worth of 5 billion dollars and chase has not financed any Hollywood movies, so he must be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club.

The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is the part of evidence in support of this argument; the second is the conclusion that could not be drawn from all evidence that the argument contains.

(B) The first is the first-evidence that supports this argument; the second is the mainpoint that must be drawn from all evidence that the argument includes.

(C) The first is the one fact of two that argument includes; the second is the conclusion that could be drawn from this passage.

(D) The first is the background that is necessary for this argument; the second is the conclusion that is not drawn only from the first.

(E) The first is the cause that the argument includes; the second is the effect that can be drawn only from this cause.


B
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Dec 2006
Posts: 136
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: Boldface CR [#permalink] New post 31 Dec 2007, 19:43
Agree w/ B
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 120
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Re: Boldface CR [#permalink] New post 31 Dec 2007, 21:23
How about A. It is tough choosing between A and D. I choose A because: the argument contains two evidences - 1. The requirements mentioned to be a part of the club. 2. Robert fulfills those requirements (partly).
All the evidence given in the argument is not sufficient to draw the conclusion.

D: actually dot have a solid reason. Just that "evidence" sounds more convincing than "background". :)

What is OA.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Posts: 759
Location: Oxford
Schools: Oxford'10
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 178 [0], given: 8

Re: Boldface CR [#permalink] New post 01 Jan 2008, 07:06
This is the first boldface CR i have seen, ever, so thank you.

A and D both sound plausible with the above explanations that people have given. How about C. C says that it is one of two facts (requirements of the country club and Robert's profile), and the second part is the conclusion that CAN be drawn (it is possible that the conclusion is weak, so what, its still a conclusion that COULD be drawn)
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1102
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 0

Re: Boldface CR [#permalink] New post 01 Jan 2008, 07:19
Ravshonbek wrote:
To be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club, one must have a net worth of over ten million dollars and must not have any connections to the entertainment industry. Robert Chase, the publishing magnate, has a net worth of 5 billion dollars and chase has not financed any Hollywood movies, so he must be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club.

The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is the part of evidence in support of this argument; the second is the conclusion that could not be drawn from all evidence that the argument contains.

(B) The first is the first-evidence that supports this argument; the second is the mainpoint that must be drawn from all evidence that the argument includes.

(C) The first is the one fact of two that argument includes; the second is the conclusion that could be drawn from this passage.

(D) The first is the background that is necessary for this argument; the second is the conclusion that is not drawn only from the first.

(E) The first is the cause that the argument includes; the second is the effect that can be drawn only from this cause.


A. is wrong in that it says "the conclusion that could not be drawn"..the conclusion can be drawn, actually
B. The first isn't the first evidence.....the first evidence is in the first part of the passage
C. to me is correct. we have two facts and the first part in boldface is one of them
D. not be drawn??
E. we don't have cause-effect in this case
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2593
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 0

Re: Boldface CR [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2008, 07:08
Ravshonbek wrote:
To be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club, one must have a net worth of over ten million dollars and must not have any connections to the entertainment industry. Robert Chase, the publishing magnate, has a net worth of 5 billion dollars and chase has not financed any Hollywood movies, so he must be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club.

The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is the part of evidence in support of this argument; the second is the conclusion that could not be drawn from all evidence that the argument contains.

(B) The first is the first-evidence that supports this argument; the second is the mainpoint that must be drawn from all evidence that the argument includes.

(C) The first is the one fact of two that argument includes; the second is the conclusion that could be drawn from this passage.

(D) The first is the background that is necessary for this argument; the second is the conclusion that is not drawn only from the first.

(E) The first is the cause that the argument includes; the second is the effect that can be drawn only from this cause.



Both A and D seem plausible. I go with A.

The conclusion can't be drawn from this argument without an assumption. Just because this billionare didn't fund any hollywood movies, doesn't mean he isn't connected with the entertainment industry.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 02 Feb 2007
Posts: 120
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: Boldface CR [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2008, 12:34
I would go with C

A says the the second bold face is NOT the conclusion
B is awkward...midpoint???
C first boldface is evidence, second is the conclusion.
D second bold face, the conclusion that IS NOT drawn from the argument
E the second bold face states that it is the effect that can be drawn only from this cause...not true.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 595
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Re: Boldface CR [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2008, 13:49
I think B is the best answer. The first part of the passage includes a fact. The second an evidence and the third a conclusion.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 108
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: Boldface CR [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2008, 14:05
What is the OA?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Posts: 1
Location: NYC
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Boldface CR [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2008, 21:48
Ravshonbek wrote:
To be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club, one must have a net worth of over ten million dollars and must not have any connections to the entertainment industry. Robert Chase, the publishing magnate, has a net worth of 5 billion dollars and chase has not financed any Hollywood movies, so he must be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club.

The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is the part of evidence in support of this argument; the second is the conclusion that could not be drawn from all evidence that the argument contains.

(B) The first is the first-evidence that supports this argument; the second is the mainpoint that must be drawn from all evidence that the argument includes.

(C) The first is the one fact of two that argument includes; the second is the conclusion that could be drawn from this passage.

(D) The first is the background that is necessary for this argument; the second is the conclusion that is not drawn only from the first.

(E) The first is the cause that the argument includes; the second is the effect that can be drawn only from this cause.



I will go with A,

The fact that Chase has not financed any Holluwood movies does not mean he does not have any connections to the entertainment industry. However, Chase`s networth is more than 10mill.. So, the first bold sentence is only part of evidence in support of the argument; and thus the conclusion can not be properly drawn from it.

B out; the evidence does not support the argument
C out; second part of C is wrong
D out; the first part is not necessary background, we do not need to know if Chase has financed any Hollywood movie, all we need to know if Chase has any connections to intertainment industry.
E out, there is no cause-effect..
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2593
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 0

Re: Boldface CR [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2008, 15:10
OA please
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 1111
Location: London
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

Re: Boldface CR [#permalink] New post 04 Jan 2008, 12:44
OA is A can anyone explain?
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2593
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 0

Re: Boldface CR [#permalink] New post 04 Jan 2008, 21:37
Ravshonbek wrote:
OA is A can anyone explain?


U were killin me there rav. i was checkin on this one for a few days :P.



The first is evidence that supports the argument: the second is a conclusion that cannot be drawn. Why???

Any of the choices that said the conclusion can be supported should be discounted. First look at the first premise: "must not have any connections to the entertainment industry" then the next premise used is that b/c Chase has not financed any hollywood movies he must be accepted to the Club. However the argument wrongly assumes that b/c he doesn't finance hollywood movies he also doesnt finance ANY OTHER industries in ENTERTAINMENT.

This premise isnt stated so there is no way this conclusion can be given. This is why A is correct.

Not sure why D is incorrect though. The conclusion does depend on other premises (unstated), I guess b/c they are unstated or assumptions this makes D wrong. I just thought A was a better answer than D.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 321 [0], given: 1

Premium Member
Re: Boldface CR [#permalink] New post 04 Jan 2008, 22:40
Ok
D is wrong because of 2 points

1. the second part of D says: conclusion can not be drawn only from the first, it means that conclusion can be drawn from two premises combined. Actually, you can not conclude from these two premises combined

2. the first part of D say: 1st boldface is a neccesary thing for argument. Actually,tit is one of the sufficient
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 99
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Re: Boldface CR [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2008, 04:15
Ravshonbek wrote:
To be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club, one must have a net worth of over ten million dollars and must not have any connections to the entertainment industry. Robert Chase, the publishing magnate, has a net worth of 5 billion dollars and chase has not financed any Hollywood movies, so he must be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club.

The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is the part of evidence in support of this argument; the second is the conclusion that could not be drawn from all evidence that the argument contains.

(B) The first is the first-evidence that supports this argument; the second is the mainpoint that must be drawn from all evidence that the argument includes.

(C) The first is the one fact of two that argument includes; the second is the conclusion that could be drawn from this passage.

(D) The first is the background that is necessary for this argument; the second is the conclusion that is not drawn only from the first.

(E) The first is the cause that the argument includes; the second is the effect that can be drawn only from this cause.



This isn't difficult.. Ans is A and noone else is near to it...

Lets break the passage.. The first line "To be accepted as...." is nothing but a premise which gives an introdution to a specifit criterion.. Second line is an evidence to make a certain arguement/conclusion.. Third is tries as a conclusion but actually can;t be one on the basis of incomplete evidence...

Now the reason evidence is incomplete is that just beceuase he hasn't financed any movie doen;t mean he doesn't have any relationship with it.. may be he is husband of Julia roberts or pamela anderson ( Lucky he).. In that case conclusion will be absolutely wrong..

Now the other choices

B) is wrong because the main point can only be drawn from the single given evidence and which si incomplete.. SO technically you just can't draw it at all.

C) again the conclusion cannot be drawn..

D) well first is not backgrowd.. its part of evidence.. background is the very first line of passage which is necessary ..

E) this may have been a cause and effect relationship had they been fitting accurately.. but unfortunately they aint
Re: Boldface CR   [#permalink] 05 Jan 2008, 04:15
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Q. To be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club, one nehadass 11 21 Jul 2012, 14:01
Experts publish their posts in the topic To be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club, one mymba99 14 29 May 2008, 16:13
To be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club, one Caas 6 12 Jun 2007, 05:11
To be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club, one HIMALAYA 12 28 Dec 2005, 19:37
To be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club, one huskers 7 29 Aug 2005, 06:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

To be accepted as a member at the Brown Country Club, one

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.