Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 31 Aug 2015, 16:42
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

To reduce the danger to life and property posed by major

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Oct 2012
Posts: 23
Concentration: Strategy
Schools: Bocconi '15 (A)
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 30 [1] , given: 33

To reduce the danger to life and property posed by major [#permalink] New post 18 Apr 2013, 05:24
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

84% (01:37) correct 16% (00:33) wrong based on 277 sessions
To reduce the danger to life and property posed by major earthquakes, scientists have been investigating several techniques for giving advance warning of dangerous earthquakes. Since catfish swim erratically before earthquakes, some investigators have proposed monitoring catfish to predict dangerous earthquakes.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the usefulness of the proposal?

(A) In Japan, which is subject to frequent earthquakes, the behavior of catfish has long been associated with earthquakes.
(B) Mechanical methods for detecting earthquakes have not proved effective.
(C) Tremors lead to the release of hydrogen sulfide gas into water, thereby causing various fish and shellfish to behave erratically.
(D) Careful construction can reduce the dangers posed by earthquakes.
(E) Even very slight, fleeting tremors cause catfish to swim erratically
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
2 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1125
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 149

Kudos [?]: 1482 [2] , given: 219

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: To reduce the danger to life and property posed by major ear [#permalink] New post 18 Apr 2013, 05:31
2
This post received
KUDOS
To prevent damages caused by earthquakes, scientists will rely on catfish because they swim erratically before earthquakes.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the usefulness of the proposal?

We have to look for an answer that undermines the connection earthquake => movement of catfish.
E does just that:
(E) Even very slight, fleeting tremors cause catfish to swim erratically
The connection in undermined now

Initially I was quite sure of C, so I want to explain why I discarded it eventually:
(C) Tremors lead to the release of hydrogen sulfide gas into water, thereby causing various fish and shellfish to behave erratically.
The text talks about catfish and not about "various fish", we cannot say anything about catfish.
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 136
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 42 [1] , given: 3

Premium Member
Re: To reduce the danger to life and property posed by major ear [#permalink] New post 18 Apr 2013, 06:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
well i think all the choices but E are helping to explain as why this plan can work
E sud be the answer coz conclusion is abt the dangerous earthquakes but E tells us that even minor tremors can cause these fish to behave erratically !! so the plan is useless
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5034
Followers: 525

Kudos [?]: 105 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: To reduce the danger to life and property posed by major [#permalink] New post 03 May 2014, 16:40
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 920
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 386 [0], given: 322

Premium Member
Re: To reduce the danger to life and property posed by major [#permalink] New post 04 Sep 2014, 00:10
Zarrolou wrote:
To prevent damages caused by earthquakes, scientists will rely on catfish because they swim erratically before earthquakes.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the usefulness of the proposal?

We have to look for an answer that undermines the connection earthquake => movement of catfish.
E does just that:
(E) Even very slight, fleeting tremors cause catfish to swim erratically
The connection in undermined now

Initially I was quite sure of C, so I want to explain why I discarded it eventually:
(C) Tremors lead to the release of hydrogen sulfide gas into water, thereby causing various fish and shellfish to behave erratically.
The text talks about catfish and not about "various fish", we cannot say anything about catfish.


Hi Zarr,

Choice (E) Even very slight, fleeting tremors cause catfish to swim erratically

Can't we infer that in case of dangerous earthquakes, definitely the cat fish would SWIM erratically?

And hence the proposal of monitoring the CATFISH to predict dangerous earthquakes is strengthened rather than weaken.
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 434
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT 1: Q47 V29
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 135 [1] , given: 560

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: To reduce the danger to life and property posed by major [#permalink] New post 04 Sep 2014, 02:25
1
This post received
KUDOS
My 2 cents, I think answer lies within the story "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" :)
Joke apart.. idea is to find a reliable solution for giving advance warning abt dangerous earthquakes to people.
Now if scientists are relying on a source, which behaves similarly in 2 different situations then how would they decide whether its time to alert ppl abt the major earthquake or not.
Hope this answered your query and didn't create further confusion :)
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards :)

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Please do not forget to give kudos if you like my post
Joined: 19 Sep 2008
Posts: 129
Location: United States (CA)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 257

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: To reduce the danger to life and property posed by major [#permalink] New post 30 Nov 2014, 18:11
Argument talking about dangerous earthquake and E undermines this argument saying that its not accurate and misleading.

Answer: E

rajatr wrote:
To reduce the danger to life and property posed by major earthquakes, scientists have been investigating several techniques for giving advance warning of dangerous earthquakes. Since catfish swim erratically before earthquakes, some investigators have proposed monitoring catfish to predict dangerous earthquakes.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the usefulness of the proposal?

(A) In Japan, which is subject to frequent earthquakes, the behavior of catfish has long been associated with earthquakes.
(B) Mechanical methods for detecting earthquakes have not proved effective.
(C) Tremors lead to the release of hydrogen sulfide gas into water, thereby causing various fish and shellfish to behave erratically.
(D) Careful construction can reduce the dangers posed by earthquakes.
(E) Even very slight, fleeting tremors cause catfish to swim erratically

_________________

Please Help with Kudos, if you like my post.


Re: To reduce the danger to life and property posed by major   [#permalink] 30 Nov 2014, 18:11
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Insect infestation is a danger for households in which catfreak 3 31 Aug 2012, 20:14
4 Country life vjsharma25 6 24 Mar 2011, 11:03
1 Insect infestation is a danger for households in which themangoman 18 19 Sep 2010, 10:09
Woodsmoke contains dangerous toxins that cause changes in remgeo 10 07 Apr 2006, 02:55
Insect infestation is a danger for households in which coffeeloverfreak 5 09 Sep 2005, 22:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

To reduce the danger to life and property posed by major

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.