Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 29 Jun 2016, 18:54
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 164
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 210 [0], given: 6

Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Mar 2011, 11:02
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (02:35) correct 46% (01:46) wrong based on 247 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Today’s farmers plant only a handful of different
strains of a given crop. Crops lack the diversity that
they had only a few generations ago. Hence, a disease
that strikes only a few strains of crops, and that would
have had only minor impact on the food supply in the
past, would devastate it today.
Which one of the following, if true, would most
weaken the argument?
(A) In the past, crop diseases would often devastate
food supplies throughout entire regions.
(B) Affected crops can quickly be replaced from
seed banks that store many strains of those
crops.
(C) Some of the less popular seed strains that were
used in the past were more resistant to many
diseases than are the strains popular today.
(D) Humans today have more variety in their diets
than in the past, but still rely heavily on cereal
crops like rice and wheat.
(E) Today’s crops are much less vulnerable to
damage from insects or encroachment by
weeds than were crops of a few generations
ago.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 920
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 299 [0], given: 123

Reviews Badge
Re: Today’s farmers plant only a handful [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Mar 2011, 11:27
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Conclusion : A disease that strikes just a few strains will devastate the food supply.
Evidence : Farmers plant few strains

If the affected crops can be replaced then the effect of the destruction can be annulled. This is exactly B.

vjsharma25 wrote:
Today’s farmers plant only a handful of different
strains of a given crop. Crops lack the diversity that
they had only a few generations ago. Hence, a disease
that strikes only a few strains of crops, and that would
have had only minor impact on the food supply in the
past, would devastate it today.
Which one of the following, if true, would most
weaken the argument?
(A) In the past, crop diseases would often devastate
food supplies throughout entire regions.
(B) Affected crops can quickly be replaced from
seed banks that store many strains of those
crops.
(C) Some of the less popular seed strains that were
used in the past were more resistant to many
diseases than are the strains popular today.
(D) Humans today have more variety in their diets
than in the past, but still rely heavily on cereal
crops like rice and wheat.
(E) Today’s crops are much less vulnerable to
damage from insects or encroachment by
weeds than were crops of a few generations
ago.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 164
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 210 [0], given: 6

Re: Today’s farmers plant only a handful [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Mar 2011, 11:45
Why not (E) ?
Can't we relate insects to the disease?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 410
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 115

Reviews Badge
Re: Today’s farmers plant only a handful [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Mar 2011, 11:47
vjsharma25 wrote:
Why not (E) ?
Can't we relate insects to the disease?

Exactly. We cannot assume that insects=disease. Hence, E is ruled out.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 2035
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 770 Q0 V
Followers: 46

Kudos [?]: 473 [0], given: 355

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Today’s farmers plant only a handful [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2014, 11:21
heygirl wrote:
vjsharma25 wrote:
Why not (E) ?
Can't we relate insects to the disease?

Exactly. We cannot assume that insects=disease. Hence, E is ruled out.


Oh I see very clever.

Cheers!

J :)
SDA Bocconi Thread Master
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2012
Posts: 39
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 34

Premium Member
Re: Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2014, 18:05
Why not A?
If I can prove that in the past also food supplies were devastated due to diseases, so we cant blame today's farming styles completely?

Regards,
DJ
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 433
Location: India
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 352 [1] , given: 14

Re: Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2014, 22:56
1
This post received
KUDOS
vjsharma25 wrote:
Today’s farmers plant only a handful of different
strains of a given crop. Crops lack the diversity that
they had only a few generations ago. Hence, a disease
that strikes only a few strains of crops, and that would
have had only minor impact on the food supply in the
past, would devastate it today.
Which one of the following, if true, would most
weaken the argument?
(A) In the past, crop diseases would often devastate
food supplies throughout entire regions.
(B) Affected crops can quickly be replaced from
seed banks that store many strains of those
crops.
(C) Some of the less popular seed strains that were
used in the past were more resistant to many
diseases than are the strains popular today.
(D) Humans today have more variety in their diets
than in the past, but still rely heavily on cereal
crops like rice and wheat.
(E) Today’s crops are much less vulnerable to
damage from insects or encroachment by
weeds than were crops of a few generations
ago.


Negate the conclusion

It is: The disease that strikes the few strains of crops would not devastate the food supply

Since this is a weaken question look for the choice that offers an explanation for the above.

Choice B offers the reason why the food supply would not be devastated. None of the others do.
_________________

Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Sravna
http://www.sravnatestprep.com

Classroom Courses in Chennai

SDA Bocconi Thread Master
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2012
Posts: 39
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 34

Premium Member
Re: Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jan 2014, 05:36
SravnaTestPrep wrote:
vjsharma25 wrote:
Today’s farmers plant only a handful of different
strains of a given crop. Crops lack the diversity that
they had only a few generations ago. Hence, a disease
that strikes only a few strains of crops, and that would
have had only minor impact on the food supply in the
past, would devastate it today.
Which one of the following, if true, would most
weaken the argument?
(A) In the past, crop diseases would often devastate
food supplies throughout entire regions.
(B) Affected crops can quickly be replaced from
seed banks that store many strains of those
crops.
(C) Some of the less popular seed strains that were
used in the past were more resistant to many
diseases than are the strains popular today.
(D) Humans today have more variety in their diets
than in the past, but still rely heavily on cereal
crops like rice and wheat.
(E) Today’s crops are much less vulnerable to
damage from insects or encroachment by
weeds than were crops of a few generations
ago.


Negate the conclusion

It is: The disease that strikes the few strains of crops would not devastate the food supply

Since this is a weaken question look for the choice that offers an explanation for the above.

Choice B offers the reason why the food supply would not be devastated. None of the others do.


But how can B negate? Just asking. Once a set of crops get disease, how would new seeds will help the crops? We will have to plant the seeds again to get a disease free produce.

My thinking is that devastation is blamed entirely on lack of diversity in today's ways of agriculture.
So negation of this can be: If devastation has occured in the past as well due to diseases.

Regards,
DJ
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 433
Location: India
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 352 [0], given: 14

Re: Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jan 2014, 05:56
akashganga wrote:
SravnaTestPrep wrote:
vjsharma25 wrote:
Today’s farmers plant only a handful of different
strains of a given crop. Crops lack the diversity that
they had only a few generations ago. Hence, a disease
that strikes only a few strains of crops, and that would
have had only minor impact on the food supply in the
past, would devastate it today.
Which one of the following, if true, would most
weaken the argument?
(A) In the past, crop diseases would often devastate
food supplies throughout entire regions.
(B) Affected crops can quickly be replaced from
seed banks that store many strains of those
crops.
(C) Some of the less popular seed strains that were
used in the past were more resistant to many
diseases than are the strains popular today.
(D) Humans today have more variety in their diets
than in the past, but still rely heavily on cereal
crops like rice and wheat.
(E) Today’s crops are much less vulnerable to
damage from insects or encroachment by
weeds than were crops of a few generations
ago.


Negate the conclusion

It is: The disease that strikes the few strains of crops would not devastate the food supply

Since this is a weaken question look for the choice that offers an explanation for the above.

Choice B offers the reason why the food supply would not be devastated. None of the others do.


But how can B negate? Just asking. Once a set of crops get disease, how would new seeds will help the crops? We will have to plant the seeds again to get a disease free produce.

My thinking is that devastation is blamed entirely on lack of diversity in today's ways of agriculture.
So negation of this can be: If devastation has occured in the past as well due to diseases.

Regards,
DJ


Hi DJ,

What my method does is to negate the conclusion and see which choice offers the best explanation for the negated conclusion in the case of a weaken question. The negated conclusion is that, the food supply would not be devastated. Choice B offers the reason why the food supply would not be devastated. Choice A does not offer the reason for the negated conclusion.
_________________

Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Sravna
http://www.sravnatestprep.com

Classroom Courses in Chennai

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 125
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 81 [1] , given: 1

Re: Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jan 2014, 07:08
1
This post received
KUDOS
PREMISES: farmers plant only some strains ... so diversity is less
CONC: diseases (strike only few strains) will be more devastating today

Option A: talking about the past /irrelevant
Option B: talking about a solution
Option C: Comparing the past less popular strains and present popular strains /irrelevant
Option D: talks about diets / irrelevant
Option E: talking about insects or weeds not diseases /irrelevant

Hence, B is the answer.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 8103
Followers: 739

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Sep 2015, 20:53
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of   [#permalink] 27 Sep 2015, 20:53
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
9 Experts publish their posts in the topic Only some strains of the tobacco plant are naturally resista notrandom 3 04 Nov 2013, 02:03
1 Daphne will go to the park today only if ernie also goes to georgepaul0071987 3 14 Oct 2011, 12:33
Only 4 out of 24 questions tagged with Source Today Zatarra 0 08 Jan 2011, 05:25
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic The only plants in the garden were tulips, but they were gmatcrook 7 27 Jun 2008, 12:56
A certain strain of bacteria was found in the stomachs of Andr359 11 01 Jul 2007, 06:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Today s farmers plant only a handful of different strains of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.