snehshah wrote:
The Prompt: “Studies suggest that an average coffee drinker’s consumption of coffee increases with age, from age 10 through age 60. Even after age 60, coffee consumption remains high. The average cola drinker’s consumption of cola, however, declines with increasing age. Both of these trends have remained stable for the past 40 years. Given that the number of older adults will significantly increase as the population ages over the next 20 years, it follows that the demand for coffee will increase and the demand for cola will decrease during this period. We should, therefore, consider transferring our investments from Cola Loca to Early Bird Coffee.”
The argument suggests that according to past studies, the average coffee drinker's consumption of coffee increases whereas the consumption of cola by cola drinkers decreases. Therefore, the firm suggests transferring their investments from Cola Loca to Early Bird Coffee. This conclusion is flawed. It presents vague results of various studies and has its basis in questionable assumptions.
Firstly, the argument assumes that the trend will continue to remain steady over the next 20 years. However, this may not hold true. For example, it may be discovered that increased coffee consumption results in certain undesirable side effects, which would furthermore lead to a decline in the amount of coffee consumed and therefore purchased by coffee-drinkers.
Secondly, the argument claims that the number of older adults will increase over the next 20 years. This is quite a vague assertion that has not been backed up by any statistics. Moreover, the argument also assumes that there would not be a greater or equal increase in the population of younger people. There may be more young people than ever over the next 20 years while the number of older adults could be lower than ever. In such a case, it would be prudent for the firm to continue their investments in Cola Loca.
Thirdly, this argument focuses on the demographics of the consumers of Cola Loca and Early Bird Coffee when instead it should also consider market competition. While Early Bird Coffee might have hundreds of competitiors, Cola Loca might hold a large portion of the market share. Early Bird Coffee may be competing for a small portion of the market whereas even if the total size of the market is smaller for cola, Cola Loca would still have a large consumer base.
Finally, it is important to account for the costs of these products with regard to consumer behaviour. Early Bird Coffee may be more expensive than other alternative coffee brands, causing it to lose customers despite an increase in the total coffee consumption. If Cola Loca provides an affordable product, it would manage to attract more consumers than Early Bird Coffee.
In conclusion, while the argument is strong and follows a clear line of thinking, it is based on questionable assumptions and ignores several factors that need to be looked into before suggesting a transfer of investments. If there is a change in trends over the next 20 years, if the population growth trends unexpectedly, if the market share of Cola Loca is larger or if the pricing of Cola Loca is more attractive to consumers, the firm should not transfer its investments to Early Bird Coffee.
I have two Important Issues with your opening paragraph ::
--> ".... it presents vague results of various studies..." In my opinion, the findings of the study are not vague, rather it is the assumption/belief of the author, followed by a decision to invest.
--> In the very first line of the opening paragraph, you have skipped the role of the "age". That weakens your opening statement as presented in the argument.
what I really liked in your essay :
--> Ability to think beyond. Discussion on market share is a good point.
--> Language used and sentences framed are impactful.
I also doubt the validity of your thought - connecting costs to customer consumption. This is my opinion is out of the scope of the argument and is your personal assumption. The goal is to validate or invalidate authors' assumptions.