Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

I think is a great book in terms of giving you the fundamentals to "refresh" what you have forgotten back in high school. However, the end of chapter questions do require you to go beyond what was covered in the chapter... that is, you won't be able to attend 100% accuracy by just simply reading the chapters.

I do not use MGMAT quant material, so I do not know the comparison. However, I do think Jeff's book is reasonably priced for the stuff you get.

I used this and that math questions and I thought the materials were very good. I started with the MGMAT books and then moved on to Sackmann's materials. In hindsight, MGMAT helped me review the basics and Sackman's materials got me over the hump on how to tackle the quant section. The materials build a great foundation for gmat type questions. I improved drastically after using Sackman's materials but I focused on the tricks and fundamentals.

If you are weak in quant sackman's materials can be a little confusing. If you have decent knowledge go with sackman only.

Let me know if you have more questions about his materials. Total GMAT Math along with his challenge sets were beneficial.

In addition, Sackmann responds to his emails within 24 hours. In all his questions, 1000+ I caught two errors. I told him about it and he responded within 24 hours and corrected it. On a few occasions, he took the time to explain a few answers when his were not clear.

Regarding the 1,800 math questions, don't print those out. It's better practice to read the problems on the computer screen. I usually opened two of the same math files: one for the questions, and one for the explanations. That way, I didn't have to scroll up and down every time to check my answers.

So between the MGMAT guides, Sackman and the OG, aiming for a 48-50 on the Quant would be a good shot if you put in the right amount of work?

I scored an 18 quant on my first practice test. After reading MGMAT and practicing with Jeff Sackmann's math sets and GMATClub Tests, I made it to 48 on the real thing. I also used the OG books.

The fundamental sets are fairly simple, but it's good to do those and read his explanations, which are fantastic. Trust me, reading 1,800 math explanations helps to improve your understanding. GMATClub tests are very difficult and should be saved for last, but these will ensure a strong performance on the quant section. These are the two best sources for math questions.

I didn't like the math exercises in the MGMAT guides. I would actually skip them. Read the chapters and use Sackmann's questions instead.
_________________

If you already have the MGMAT guides, then skip Total GMAT Math. In my opinion, Manhattan offers the best coverage of math concepts tested on the GMAT. But Sackmann's math sets are an excellent investment. GMATClub tests are free once you: (1) post 200 times, and (2) have been a member for three full months. You can also buy them.

My case is a little extreme, though. I practiced with thousands of questions, but I needed to do that in order to score well.
_________________

I had bought this book as a resource of questions. After going through about a quarter of the book (chapters i need to revise) i started attempting the Gmat paper tests..Some of the questions are near identical ( same language, same concept, just different numbers )... So i guess this book either directly uses GMAT language (which may or may not be legal) or does an excellent job in writing near identical questions ..

Example:

question from GMAT paper tests that has a very similar question in his book :

Quote:

If x, y, and k are positive numbers such that (yxx+)(10) + (yxy+)(20) = k and if x < y, which of the following could be the value of k? A. 10 B. 12 C. 15 D. 18 E. 30

_________________

"When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe, then you’ll be successful.” - Eric Thomas

I used this and that math questions and I thought the materials were very good. I started with the MGMAT books and then moved on to Sackmann's materials. In hindsight, MGMAT helped me review the basics and Sackman's materials got me over the hump on how to tackle the quant section. The materials build a great foundation for gmat type questions. I improved drastically after using Sackman's materials but I focused on the tricks and fundamentals.

If you are weak in quant sackman's materials can be a little confusing. If you have decent knowledge go with sackman only.

Let me know if you have more questions about his materials. Total GMAT Math along with his challenge sets were beneficial.

kindly suggest me the best to bridge my gap from 40 in quants to 50 in quants.

A score of 43Q suggests that you have a fairly firm grasp on the material. The Manhattan series is more comprehensive, but Sackmann's book contains more and higher-quality questions.

Thanks for the supportive response! To be honest, my post feels a tad tentative, since I do not fully know your situation. I think that it's reasonable for you to start noting any specific weaknesses in your math performance and emphasize those in your second attempt. For example, use Manhattan's Geometry guidebook with Sakmann's geometry sets if that area represents your weakness.

I owned both products and preferred the Manhattan series. But I started at a very low level (my first practice test was, I think, a Q19). Sackmann's math sets, however, are amazing.

Thank you all. I think I am going to get Total GMAT Math. Its a little pricey for 50 bucks but according to what I have heard seems like its worth it. Hopefully it will have enough variety of 650+ level questions to covert GMAT quant.

At least when starting out, I did not like Sackmann's Total GMAT Math and promptly switched to the Manhattan Series - the best math guides available, in my opinion. As one previous poster suggested, he simply doesn't discuss the topics thoroughly enough to fully absorb the material. The questions in the book are good, though.

However, Sackmann's math sets are, without question, amazing. I purchased and studied all of them. It was the single best investment I made for my GMAT preparation.
_________________

So between the MGMAT guides, Sackman and the OG, aiming for a 48-50 on the Quant would be a good shot if you put in the right amount of work? (I'm fairly good at Math since I am an engineer, I just need to master GMAT Math)

So between the MGMAT guides, Sackman and the OG, aiming for a 48-50 on the Quant would be a good shot if you put in the right amount of work?

I scored an 18 quant on my first practice test. After reading MGMAT and practicing with Jeff Sackmann's math sets and GMATClub Tests, I made it to 48 on the real thing. I also used the OG books.

The fundamental sets are fairly simple, but it's good to do those and read his explanations, which are fantastic. Trust me, reading 1,800 math explanations helps to improve your understanding. GMATClub tests are very difficult and should be saved for last, but these will ensure a strong performance on the quant section. These are the two best sources for math questions.

I didn't like the math exercises in the MGMAT guides. I would actually skip them. Read the chapters and use Sackmann's questions instead.

Would it be wise to buy both the Total GMAT Math and the Extreme 1800 Challenge if we already have MGMAT?

So between the MGMAT guides, Sackman and the OG, aiming for a 48-50 on the Quant would be a good shot if you put in the right amount of work?

I scored an 18 quant on my first practice test. After reading MGMAT and practicing with Jeff Sackmann's math sets and GMATClub Tests, I made it to 48 on the real thing. I also used the OG books.

The fundamental sets are fairly simple, but it's good to do those and read his explanations, which are fantastic. Trust me, reading 1,800 math explanations helps to improve your understanding. GMATClub tests are very difficult and should be saved for last, but these will ensure a strong performance on the quant section. These are the two best sources for math questions.

I didn't like the math exercises in the MGMAT guides. I would actually skip them. Read the chapters and use Sackmann's questions instead.

Would it be wise to buy both the Total GMAT Math and the Extreme 1800 Challenge if we already have MGMAT?

I read the Manhattan Gmat books and also purchased Sackman. I learned a lot from both. In my opinion it wouldn't be a waste of money. However, that's just me.

gmatclubot

Re: Total GMAT Math - Jeff Sackmann
[#permalink]
18 Jun 2010, 16:49

After days of waiting, sharing the tension with other applicants in forums, coming up with different theories about invites patterns, and, overall, refreshing my inbox every five minutes to...

I was totally freaking out. Apparently, most of the HBS invites were already sent and I didn’t get one. However, there are still some to come out on...

In early 2012, when I was working as a biomedical researcher at the National Institutes of Health , I decided that I wanted to get an MBA and make the...