Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Sep 2014, 05:42

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Trade official: Country X deserves economic retribution for

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 649
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Trade official: Country X deserves economic retribution for [#permalink] New post 29 Nov 2007, 10:10
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Trade official: Country X deserves economic retribution for its protectionism. However, it is crucial that we recognize that there are overriding considerations in this case. We should still sell to X the agricultural equipment it ordered: there is high demand in our country for agricultural imports from X.

The argument depends on assuming which one of the following principles?

(A) Agricultural components of international trade are more important than nonagricultural commodities.
(B) The ability to keep popular products available domestically is less important than our being able to enter international market.
(C) We should never jeopardize the interests of our people to punish a protectionist country.
(D) In most cases, punishing a protectionist country should have priority over the interests of our people.
(E) We should balance the justice of an action with the consequences for our interests of undertaking that action.

Please explain your answers.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 1111
Location: London
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Protectionism [#permalink] New post 29 Nov 2007, 13:15
eyunni wrote:
Trade official: Country X deserves economic retribution for its protectionism. However, it is crucial that we recognize that there are overriding considerations in this case. We should still sell to X the agricultural equipment it ordered: there is high demand in our country for agricultural imports from X.

The argument depends on assuming which one of the following principles?

(A) Agricultural components of international trade are more important than nonagricultural commodities.---out of scope
(B) The ability to keep popular products available domestically is less important than our being able to enter international market.-out of scope
(C) We should never jeopardize the interests of our people to punish a protectionist country.
(D) In most cases, punishing a protectionist country should have priority over the interests of our people.-- against the conclusion
(E) We should balance the justice of an action with the consequences for our interests of undertaking that action.--this is my answer

Please explain your answers.

E
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 649
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Nov 2007, 13:33
I was stuck between (C) and (E). However, I am somehow not convinced with the reasoning that assumptions cannot be extreme or strong.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2593
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 189 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Protectionism [#permalink] New post 29 Nov 2007, 14:57
eyunni wrote:
Trade official: Country X deserves economic retribution for its protectionism. However, it is crucial that we recognize that there are overriding considerations in this case. We should still sell to X the agricultural equipment it ordered: there is high demand in our country for agricultural imports from X.

The argument depends on assuming which one of the following principles?

(A) Agricultural components of international trade are more important than nonagricultural commodities.
(B) The ability to keep popular products available domestically is less important than our being able to enter international market.
(C) We should never jeopardize the interests of our people to punish a protectionist country.
(D) In most cases, punishing a protectionist country should have priority over the interests of our people.
(E) We should balance the justice of an action with the consequences for our interests of undertaking that action.

Please explain your answers.


Agree w/ E. C could be an assumption but its too extreme. Remember we need to find the BEST answer. While C maybe an optimal answer, E is more optimal.

its this reason why I like math more than verbal. In math if u do everything right u get the answer. Verbal... maybe.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 649
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Nov 2007, 15:06
hmm...OA is E. but......
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 183
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Nov 2007, 15:18
E as well.

The wording forecasts E as the answer.

"X deserves economic retribution" coupled w/ "overriding considerations in this case". very specific - we may want to jeopardize in other instances.

justice coupled w/ exceptions.

I don't think strong language is warranted here. It could be a valid answer at times.
  [#permalink] 29 Nov 2007, 15:18
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Trade official: Country X deserves economic retribution for noboru 14 26 Sep 2010, 09:21
The pattern of economic crisis in the developing countries GHIBI 6 16 Jan 2008, 05:17
1 The fight against the drug trade in Country X should focus beckee529 8 10 Oct 2007, 11:36
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, sgrover 7 02 Oct 2005, 21:12
8 For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, WinWinMBA 12 02 May 2005, 14:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Trade official: Country X deserves economic retribution for

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.