Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Apr 2015, 23:36

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Traditionally, video game manufacturers have been most

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 286
Followers: 32

Kudos [?]: 465 [1] , given: 19

Premium Member
Traditionally, video game manufacturers have been most [#permalink] New post 05 May 2012, 21:49
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

66% (02:49) correct 34% (01:46) wrong based on 263 sessions
Traditionally, video game manufacturers have been most strongly influenced by serious
video gamers. Because devoted gamers have historically purchased the majority of video
games, companies react to the desires of this market segment. Normally, devoted gamers
crave speed and action; thus, most manufacturers continue to produce games with faster
chips and flashier graphics.
Unfortunately, faster chips and flashier graphics are no longer
in the industry’s best interest. The devoted gaming market is deeply stagnant, and it
won’t soon expand.
To infuse new life into the video game market, manufacturers must
simplify the functionality of their games. By doing so, current non-gamers will be attracted
to join the ranks of video game fans. In the argument, the two portions in boldface play
which of the following roles?
A) The first is a situation that the author believes to be true; the second offers evidence to
explain this situation.
b) The first is a situation that the author argues should not continue; the second provides
evidence that supports the author’s position.
c) The first is a statement of fact that contradicts the author’s position; the second is the
author’s position.
d) The first is a statement of fact that supports the author’s position; the second is a
consideration that weighs against the author’s position.
e) The first is a prediction that the author believes should not hold in this case; the second is an
assumption that weighs against the author’s position.

Main CR Qs link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

********************
Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post.

Kaplan Promo CodeKnewton GMAT Discount CodesGMAT Pill GMAT Discount Codes
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 3750
Followers: 414

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Traditionally, video game manufacturers have been most [#permalink] New post 04 Oct 2013, 10:11
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 16

Re: Traditionally, video game manufacturers have been most [#permalink] New post 04 Oct 2013, 10:13
Answer choices B, C, D, are all too similar.

b) The first is a situation that the author argues should not continue; the second provides
evidence that supports the author’s position.
c) The first is a statement of fact that contradicts the author’s position; the second is the
author’s position.
d) The first is a statement of fact that supports the author’s position; the second is a
consideration that weighs against the author’s position.

May someone explain the differences. Thanks
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 3750
Followers: 414

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Traditionally, video game manufacturers have been most [#permalink] New post 01 Dec 2014, 05:42
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Sep 2014
Posts: 6
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT Date: 01-17-2015
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 32

Re: Traditionally, video game manufacturers have been most [#permalink] New post 09 Dec 2014, 23:09
cmclaurin wrote:
Answer choices B, C, D, are all too similar.

b) The first is a situation that the author argues should not continue; the second provides
evidence that supports the author’s position.
c) The first is a statement of fact that contradicts the author’s position; the second is the
author’s position.
d) The first is a statement of fact that supports the author’s position; the second is a
consideration that weighs against the author’s position.

May someone explain the differences. Thanks



Hi

Lets look at C

It says the second is the author’s position but if you look carefullly the second is just an opionion given by the author
"The devoted gaming market is deeply stagnant, and it won’t soon expand"

The authors position is

"To infuse new life into the video game market, manufacturers must simplify the functionality of their games. By doing so, current non-gamers will be attracted to join the ranks of video game fans"

Now lets look at D

It says

"The first is a statement of fact that supports the author’s position;"

It is actually against the authors position he wants this to be stopped.

Now when we look at B

It says

"The first is a situation that the author argues should not continue; the second provides
evidence that supports the author’s position"


If you look carefully then it is correct to infer that first is a situation that author thinks should not continue

and

If you look at the second boldface then it is actually giving a evidence to why the current practice should be changed.

What follows the boldface is the position that author holds.

Hope this helps. :)
Re: Traditionally, video game manufacturers have been most   [#permalink] 09 Dec 2014, 23:09
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Boldface Revision: Traditionally, video game manufacturers have been souvik101990 2 20 Mar 2015, 22:34
1 Although video game sales have increased steadily over creativeminddu 3 19 Nov 2013, 01:39
7 Experts publish their posts in the topic Traditionally, video game manufacturers have been most aditi1903 6 09 Oct 2012, 23:19
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Although video game sales have increased steadily over the pgmat 6 29 Jan 2011, 07:43
Experts publish their posts in the topic A leading cement manufacturer has been having problems reply2spg 24 19 Feb 2009, 08:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Traditionally, video game manufacturers have been most

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.