|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 199
Schools: ABCD
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
9
[1] , given: 78
|
Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author [#permalink]
03 Sep 2012, 10:11
1
This post received KUDOS
Question Stats:
70% (01:53) correct
29% (00:39) wrong based on 2 sessions
Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author claims that European hotels are better designed than American hotels. This claim is justified by a thorough comparison of 25 populat European hotels and 25 popular American hotels. In this comparison, none of the American hotels were as complexly designed as any of the European ones. The travel agent's argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms? a) The hotels reviewed by the book may be those that best serve its proposal. b) Hotels can be judged by other merits besides design c) The author of the book has written other books favoring European travel. d) Hotels in other parts of the world may be better designed than those in Europe. e) Someone who hasn't been to Europe might not appreciate hotel design. OA is A - Why? After all, A) supports Travel Agent's argument. Travel agent tends to disagree with the author of the book. How could A) be a criticism of his argument? I am unsure about all the five answer choices. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 361
Schools: IE'14, ISB'14, Kellogg'15
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
81
[0], given: 50
|
Re: Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author clai [#permalink]
03 Sep 2012, 10:32
voodoochild wrote: Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author claims that European hotels are better designed than American hotels. This claim is justified by a thorough comparison of 25 populat European hotels and 25 popular American hotels. In this comparison, none of the American hotels were as complexly designed as any of the European ones.
The travel agent's argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
a) The hotels reviewed by the book may be those that best serve its proposal. b) Hotels can be judged by other merits besides design c) The author of the book has written other books favoring European travel. d) Hotels in other parts of the world may be better designed than those in Europe. e) Someone who hasn't been to Europe might not appreciate hotel design.
OA is A - Why? After all, A) supports Travel Agent's argument. Travel agent tends to disagree with the author of the book. How could A) be a criticism of his argument?
I am unsure about all the five answer choices. Thanks Answer choice A brings a classic flaw in the argument above. It shows that the selection of hotels are biased. It intentionally picked the better designed European Hotels or other way round u can say it picked the worse American hotels for comparison. ie. the selection of hotels are biased.
_________________
Regards SD ----------------------------- Press Kudos if you like my post. Debrief 610-540-580-710(Long Journey): from-600-540-580-710-finally-achieved-in-4th-attempt-142456.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 73
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 7
|
Re: Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author clai [#permalink]
03 Sep 2012, 18:41
a) The hotels reviewed by the book may be those that best serve its proposal. – affecting the conclusion by weakening b) Hotels can be judged by other merits besides design –general statement. Not affecting the conclusion c) The author of the book has written other books favoring European travel. --irrelevant d) Hotels in other parts of the world may be better designed than those in Europe. --irrelevant e) Someone who hasn't been to Europe might not appreciate hotel design. --irrelevant Conclusion is, “European hotels are better designed than American hotels”
_________________
Please provide kudos if you like my post. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 3113
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 572
Kudos [?]:
2015
[2] , given: 92
|
Re: Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author clai [#permalink]
03 Sep 2012, 21:16
2
This post received KUDOS
voodoochild wrote: Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author claims that European hotels are better designed than American hotels. This claim is justified by a thorough comparison of 25 populat European hotels and 25 popular American hotels. In this comparison, none of the American hotels were as complexly designed as any of the European ones.
The travel agent's argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
a) The hotels reviewed by the book may be those that best serve its proposal. b) Hotels can be judged by other merits besides design c) The author of the book has written other books favoring European travel. d) Hotels in other parts of the world may be better designed than those in Europe. e) Someone who hasn't been to Europe might not appreciate hotel design.
OA is A - Why? After all, A) supports Travel Agent's argument. Travel agent tends to disagree with the author of the book. How could A) be a criticism of his argument?
I am unsure about all the five answer choices.
Thanks Responding to a pm: Why do you feel that the travel agent is disagreeing with the author? The travel agent's argument is the same as the argument of the author. He says that the book claims so and so and the claim is justified by a thorough comparison of so and so etc. I don't see the travel agent disagreeing with the author or being skeptical of the book/author. If anything, the use of the word 'thorough' makes me feel that he is trying to persuade the listener of the author's opinion.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog
Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.
Veritas Prep Reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Posts: 82
Schools: IIM
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 11
|
Re: Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author clai [#permalink]
04 Sep 2012, 05:00
A is not looking a good answer.
The premise says that the travel agent has compared 25 popular European hotels with 25 popular American hotels. So, how can he review the hotels which serve his purpose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 199
Schools: ABCD
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 78
|
Re: Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author clai [#permalink]
04 Sep 2012, 11:29
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: voodoochild wrote: Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author claims that European hotels are better designed than American hotels. This claim is justified by a thorough comparison of 25 populat European hotels and 25 popular American hotels. In this comparison, none of the American hotels were as complexly designed as any of the European ones.
The travel agent's argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
a) The hotels reviewed by the book may be those that best serve its proposal. b) Hotels can be judged by other merits besides design c) The author of the book has written other books favoring European travel. d) Hotels in other parts of the world may be better designed than those in Europe. e) Someone who hasn't been to Europe might not appreciate hotel design.
OA is A - Why? After all, A) supports Travel Agent's argument. Travel agent tends to disagree with the author of the book. How could A) be a criticism of his argument?
I am unsure about all the five answer choices.
Thanks Responding to a pm: Why do you feel that the travel agent is disagreeing with the author? The travel agent's argument is the same as the argument of the author. He says that the book claims so and so and the claim is justified by a thorough comparison of so and so etc. I don't see the travel agent disagreeing with the author or being skeptical of the book/author. If anything, the use of the word 'thorough' makes me feel that he is trying to persuade the listener of the author's opinion. Karishma, Thanks for your reply. The entire article, in my opinion, has a neutral language. The word "thorough" could also imply a neutral analysis about the study. In fact, after re-reading the prompt, I feel that the agent is not agreeing. (confused  ) Let's take an example : Tom: Harry says that British cars are worse than German cars. Harry did a detailed study of 34 cars. The study didn't even consider Mclaren. What does it tell you? Tom is disagreeing with Harry. Isn't it? In fact, this question appears to be a copy-paste from this gmatprep problem: http://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2012/07/ ... ing-skillsThe gmatprep question clearly states the stand "In this the book must be right"..I just to make sure that I am not missing anything in this problem. Please let me know your thoughts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1756
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 50
Kudos [?]:
145
[0], given: 108
|
Re: Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author clai [#permalink]
04 Sep 2012, 16:56
+1 A Probably, the group of European hotels is not representative.
_________________
"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."
My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 509
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 20
Kudos [?]:
87
[0], given: 262
|
Re: Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author clai [#permalink]
05 Sep 2012, 22:03
voodoochild wrote: Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author claims that European hotels are better designed than American hotels. This claim is justified by a thorough comparison of 25 populat European hotels and 25 popular American hotels. In this comparison, none of the American hotels were as complexly designed as any of the European ones.
The travel agent's argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
a) The hotels reviewed by the book may be those that best serve its proposal. b) Hotels can be judged by other merits besides design c) The author of the book has written other books favoring European travel. d) Hotels in other parts of the world may be better designed than those in Europe. e) Someone who hasn't been to Europe might not appreciate hotel design.
OA is A - Why? After all, A) supports Travel Agent's argument. Travel agent tends to disagree with the author of the book. How could A) be a criticism of his argument?
I am unsure about all the five answer choices.
Thanks I agree with your point. a) supports Travel agent's argument.
_________________
First Attempt 710 - first-attempt-141273.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 3113
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 572
Kudos [?]:
2015
[0], given: 92
|
Re: Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author clai [#permalink]
05 Sep 2012, 22:17
voodoochild wrote: Karishma, Thanks for your reply. The entire article, in my opinion, has a neutral language. The word "thorough" could also imply a neutral analysis about the study. In fact, after re-reading the prompt, I feel that the agent is not agreeing. (confused  ) Let's take an example : Tom: Harry says that British cars are worse than German cars. Harry did a detailed study of 34 cars. The study didn't even consider Mclaren. What does it tell you? Tom is disagreeing with Harry. Isn't it? In fact, this question appears to be a copy-paste from this gmatprep problem: http://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2012/07/ ... ing-skillsThe gmatprep question clearly states the stand "In this the book must be right"..I just to make sure that I am not missing anything in this problem. Please let me know your thoughts. I replied to this post yesterday but I cannot see it anywhere today. Anyway, I will give the gist of what I wrote yesterday: Quote:"Tom: Harry says that British cars are worse than German cars. Harry did a detailed study of 34 cars. The study didn't even consider Mclaren. What does it tell you? Tom is disagreeing with Harry. Isn't it?" You are right. I certainly get the feeling that Tom doesn't agree. But this argument does not parallel the original argument. Quote: "Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author claims that European hotels are better designed than American hotels. This claim is justified by a thorough comparison of 25 populat European hotels and 25 popular American hotels. In this comparison, none of the American hotels were as complexly designed as any of the European ones. " The last sentence is a part of the book's conclusion. The author of the book found that none of the American hotels were as complexly designed as any of the European ones and hence, none of the American hotels were as well designed as European ones. The travel agent is just telling you what the author did and what he found. He is not giving his own input. Quote: "In fact, this question appears to be a copy-paste from this gmatprep problem" It is on the same lines, definitely. Actually, we strive to do that so that you can practice "GMAT like questions". Just like in the GMAT prep questions, here too the travel agent is supporting the book even though the stand is not clearly given.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog
Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.
Veritas Prep Reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 509
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 20
Kudos [?]:
87
[0], given: 262
|
Re: Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author clai [#permalink]
05 Sep 2012, 22:24
Thanks Karishma But how do we know that the last sentence is book's conclusion and not agent's conclusion?
_________________
First Attempt 710 - first-attempt-141273.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 3113
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 572
Kudos [?]:
2015
[1] , given: 92
|
Re: Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author clai [#permalink]
05 Sep 2012, 22:46
1
This post received KUDOS
getgyan wrote: Thanks Karishma
But how do we know that the last sentence is book's conclusion and not agent's conclusion? How will the travel agent know that the American hotels were not as complexly designed as the European ones? Only the author, who has done a thorough comparison, can say it, isn't it?
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog
Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.
Veritas Prep Reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 509
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 20
Kudos [?]:
87
[0], given: 262
|
Re: Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author clai [#permalink]
05 Sep 2012, 22:53
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: getgyan wrote: Thanks Karishma
But how do we know that the last sentence is book's conclusion and not agent's conclusion? How will the travel agent know that the American hotels were not as complexly designed as the European ones? Only the author, who has done a thorough comparison, can say it, isn't it? Thanks, But why not? It would then be an assumption. What if the last sentence was agent's conclusion? How would the answer change?
_________________
First Attempt 710 - first-attempt-141273.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Travel Agent: In the book travelling abroad, the author clai
[#permalink]
05 Sep 2012, 22:53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|