Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 13 Jul 2014, 21:33

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 196
Schools: ABCD
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [1] , given: 78

GMAT Tests User
Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2012, 13:52
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

53% (06:29) correct 46% (02:04) wrong based on 134 sessions
Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found on public property cannot legally be privately owned. But according to centuries-old maritime law, people who risk their lives attempting to rescue a ship in peril are permitted to keep whatever cargo they can salvage. Under this rule treasure hunters clearly are entitled to keep the cargo from ancient shipwrecks that they risk their lives to save from oblivion in public waters.

Archaeologist: Not so. These shipwrecks have stabilized over the centuries they have lain underwater. The only danger they are in is from greedy treasure hunters who destroy archaeological evidence in their hurry to loot salable artifacts.


On the evidence of their statements, it can be concluded that the treasure hunter and the archaeologist disagree on which one of the following?

(A) what constitutes an archaeological artifact
(B) in what sense, if any, an ancient shipwreck can be said to be in peril
(C) whether treasure hunters risk their lives when they retrieve artifacts from ancient shipwrecks
(D) whether maritime law can ever be applied to a ship that has already sunk
(E) whether antique shipwrecks in public waters can properly be said to be on public property

Why not C?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 1918
Followers: 461

Kudos [?]: 1793 [2] , given: 29

Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink] New post 01 Oct 2012, 11:57
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
voodoochild wrote:
Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found on public property cannot legally be privately owned. But according to centuries-old maritime law, people who risk their lives attempting to rescue a ship in peril are permitted to keep whatever cargo they can salvage. Under this rule treasure hunters clearly are entitled to keep the cargo from ancient shipwrecks that they risk their lives to save from oblivion in public waters.
Archaeologist: Not so. These shipwrecks have stabilized over the centuries they have lain underwater. The only danger they are in is from greedy treasure hunters who destroy archaeological evidence in their hurry to loot salable artifacts.

On the evidence of their statements, it can be concluded that the treasure hunter and the archaeologist disagree on which one of the following?
(A) what constitutes an archaeological artifact
(B) in what sense, if any, an ancient shipwreck can be said to be in peril
(C) whether treasure hunters risk their lives when they retrieve artifacts from ancient shipwrecks
(D) whether maritime law can ever be applied to a ship that has already sunk
(E) whether antique shipwrecks in public waters can properly be said to be on public property

Why not C?

I am answering a p.m. from voodoochild

Voodoo:
It seems to me that vishu1414 and getgyan have already done a good job of explaining why it's not C, but since you sent me a p.m., I will explain this. I will only discuss (B) & (C) since those are the answers in contention.
(B) in what sense, if any, an ancient shipwreck can be said to be in peril
(C) whether treasure hunters risk their lives when they retrieve artifacts from ancient shipwrecks


Well, the treasure hunter explicitly states that treasure hunters "risk their lives", so he states that the treasure hunters are at risk. He also explicitly states that the sunken ships are headed to "oblivion", which implies that they are decaying and vanishing, and will take the treasure with them. Thus, he also implies the sunken ships are at risk. So far, from the treasure hunter's side, both claims are stated.
Now, from the archaeologist's side. The archaeologist states, "These shipwrecks have stabilized over the centuries they have lain underwater. The only danger they are in is from greedy treasure hunters..." In other words, if the treasure hunters simply stayed away, the ship would be fine, not at all in danger. So, without any pesky treasure hunters swimming around it, the sunken ships are at no risk.

The treasure hunter and the archaeologist clearly and explicitly disagree on whether the sunken ships are at risk, whether they are in any peril. That's clear. That's why (B) is correct.
The treasure hunter also clearly feels treasure hunters put themselves at risk. By contrast, the archaeologist says nothing about the relative risk to which the treasure hunters are exposed. Does the archaeologist feel the treasure hunters are at risk? We don't know. Maybe the archaeologist thinks they are not at risk. Maybe the archaeologist thinks they are at risk and because they are doing something criminal, they deserve whatever bad things happens to them in the process. We don't know. The archaeologist's reply characterizes the treasure hunters as "greedy", as "looting", as "in [a] hurry" --- it makes clear that the archaeologist thinks the treasure hunters are causing destruction, posing a threat to the sunken ship, but this reply does not explicitly address in any way the issue of whether the treasure hunters themselves are at risk. That's why (C) is not correct.

Does all this make sense?

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 1918
Followers: 461

Kudos [?]: 1793 [2] , given: 29

Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink] New post 01 Oct 2012, 12:53
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
voodoochild wrote:
thanks Mike for your wonderful explanation. I was confused by "not so." I thought that by saying "not so" the Archaeologist is specifically denying the fact that treasure hunters risk their lives....Thoughts?

The archaeologist's first words simply connote some kind of disagreement. It would be inconsistent (and therefore misleading) only if there were no disagreement at all in what she said. (The GMAT wouldn't do that to us!) To find out what the disagreement is, we need to read the archaeologist's response carefully. It is absolutely invalid to make your own assumptions from the isolated "not so" that go into regions that the archaeologist doesn't explicitly address at all. Yes, the "not so" connotes disagreement, but you don't get to decide what that disagreement is --- you still have to read carefully and precisely.

In fact, I would argue --- those opening words, "not so", are an extremely clever trap set by the test-writer, and unwittingly, you fell into that trap. Agreement or disagreement itself can be expressed in just a word or two, but you have to read carefully to see exactly which aspects of the argument were part of the agreement or disagreement and which were not part of it. You do not get to assume you know what the agreement or disagreement is without reading carefully. That is precisely the mistake the words "not so" tempt test-takers to make.

Does that make sense?

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2011
Posts: 60
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 7

Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2012, 18:25
Treasure Hunters - ..attempting to rescue a ship in peril are permitted to keep whatever cargo they can salvage.
Under this rule treasure hunters clearly are entitled to keep the cargo from ancient shipwrecks that they risk their lives to save from oblivion in public waters.
While Archaeologist: Not so. These shipwrecks have stabilized over the centuries they have lain underwater.
They disagree over "what is scope of Maritime law ?" According to Archaeologist - These shipwrecks have stabilized and can't be defined in scope of peril
Hence -
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B


Why not (C)- whether treasure hunters risk their lives when they retrieve artifacts from ancient shipwrecks ? I think ,its not about scavenging things that are not in peril .They seem to disagree with definition of things - one(Archaeologist) says Law should be same with Artifacts in peril ,other thinks in general.
Current Student
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 514
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 267

CAT Tests
Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink] New post 01 Oct 2012, 01:23
+1 B

voodoochild wrote:
Why not C?


Good Question

Maritime Law is dependent on two things
1) risk their lives
2) ship in peril

For the law to function properly, these two things should be properly defined.

Look at what Archaeologist says
“Not so. These shipwrecks have stabilized over the centuries they have lain underwater. The only danger they are in is from greedy treasure hunters who destroy archaeological evidence in their hurry to loot salable artifacts.”
The Archaeologist only discussed about the “ship in peril” and not about the “risk their lives” i.e. the risk entailed by the treasure hunter


:-D
_________________

First Attempt 710 - first-attempt-141273.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 196
Schools: ABCD
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 78

GMAT Tests User
Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink] New post 01 Oct 2012, 12:10
thanks Mike for your wonderful explanation. I was confused by "not so." I thought that by saying "not so" the Archaeologist is specifically denying the fact that treasure hunters risk their lives....Thoughts?
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1629
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Investment Banking)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 128 [0], given: 254

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink] New post 09 May 2014, 10:47
Dude you might want to use a spoiler so that not all members of GMAT Club realize that the answer is not C

Thanks!
Cheers
J :)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 199
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 129

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found [#permalink] New post 09 May 2014, 22:22
voodoochild wrote:
Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found on public property cannot legally be privately owned. But according to centuries-old maritime law, people who risk their lives attempting to rescue a ship in peril are permitted to keep whatever cargo they can salvage. Under this rule treasure hunters clearly are entitled to keep the cargo from ancient shipwrecks that they risk their lives to save from oblivion in public waters.

Archaeologist: Not so. These shipwrecks have stabilized over the centuries they have lain underwater. The only danger they are in is from greedy treasure hunters who destroy archaeological evidence in their hurry to loot salable artifacts.


On the evidence of their statements, it can be concluded that the treasure hunter and the archaeologist disagree on which one of the following?

(A) what constitutes an archaeological artifact
(B) in what sense, if any, an ancient shipwreck can be said to be in peril
(C) whether treasure hunters risk their lives when they retrieve artifacts from ancient shipwrecks
(D) whether maritime law can ever be applied to a ship that has already sunk
(E) whether antique shipwrecks in public waters can properly be said to be on public property

Why not C?


How would you feel if I gave you and interesting question and revealed an answer?
Please use spoilers. You just need to press the spoiler button above the text box [spoiler^=^]write anything between these (after removing ^) and it will be hidden[/spoiler]
Re: Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found   [#permalink] 09 May 2014, 22:22
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Most of the archaeological treasures in this unusual exhibit gmatbull 16 14 Nov 2012, 01:55
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Treasurer's office of General Motors bseb 11 26 Dec 2010, 23:40
1 Researchers have found that current generations of bees in ykaiim 8 10 Jun 2010, 03:43
3 I found this in the general (Verbal) section but the AndersonBound 16 23 Jul 2009, 14:42
Cr - Pre-Columbian artifacts kripalkavi 6 31 Mar 2006, 19:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Treasure hunter: In general, archaeological artifacts found

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.