Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 Jan 2017, 14:18

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2007
Posts: 200
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2008, 18:15
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

77% (02:08) correct 23% (01:49) wrong based on 238 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease. Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population. Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above?

A) The many fatal stroke and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts.

B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.

C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.

D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly.

E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind.

OA to follow.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 789
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 0

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2008, 18:22
A
SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1926
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 1014 [3] , given: 1

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2008, 18:33
3
KUDOS
RyanDe680 wrote:
Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease. Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population. Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above?

A) The many fatal stroke and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts.

B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.

C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.

D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly.

E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind.

OA to follow.

I really like the way Gmac make reasoning! It is really close to life!

Certain medical expense: 1000 USD
By use treament to prevent strokes and heart deaseas, you saved 1/4 that expense, it means: 1/4*1000 =200 USD

You had 200 USD saved to keep in your pockets, but you still claimed that NO ECONOMIC JUSTIFICAITON FOR THAT TREATMENT. Really funny! Do you think so? In the daily life, the author may say: should not take that the treament.

How to attack this conclusion! If you do not take that treatment, you will loss even more than the expense required of that treatment due to strokes and heart disease.

A
_________________
CEO
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2989
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 582 [0], given: 210

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2008, 19:47
A
RyanDe680 wrote:
Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease. <-- premise 1

Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population. <-- premise 2

Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension. <-- conclusion

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above? <-- weaken the conclusion

A) The many fatal stroke and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts. <-- BINGO

B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.

C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.

D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly.

E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind.

OA to follow.
VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1459
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 256 [0], given: 0

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 May 2008, 06:15
RyanDe680 wrote:
Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease. Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population. Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above?

A) The many fatal stroke and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts.

B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.

C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.

D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly.

E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind.

OA to follow.

A...
Current Student
Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Posts: 586
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Schools: Ross '12 (MBA/MS)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 34

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 May 2008, 00:04
A. "Large economic losses of other sorts" weakens the conclusion that "there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension".
_________________
Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Posts: 47
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 4

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2011, 05:05
Yahsek wrote:
A. "Large economic losses of other sorts" weakens the conclusion that "there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension".

Hi can you tell me how this line 'Large economic losses of other sorts' weaken the stated conclusion
Manager
Joined: 30 May 2013
Posts: 190
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.82
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 72

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2014, 05:36
Only A and D looks good for me.

D is lack of information so i went with A

Rrsnathan
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10543
Followers: 920

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 May 2016, 09:23
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 152
Location: India
WE: Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 24

Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 May 2016, 05:29
Idea here is to weaken the conclusion that there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension. Choice A tells though medical expenditures are insignificant, many fatal strokes and heart attacks cause other severe economic losses. Hence preventive treatment for hypertension is economically justified.
_________________

+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks

"Pay attention to every detail"

Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical   [#permalink] 28 May 2016, 05:29
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Medical Student: Last week, a certain patient Source:Powerscore 3 03 Jun 2015, 21:14
4 A certain medication used to treat migraine headaches acts 6 28 Apr 2012, 19:00
2 Aggressive fertility treatments are not responsible for the 6 10 Jul 2011, 17:25
5 medical treatment 12 22 Mar 2011, 03:43
3 Economist: On average, the emergency treatment for an 10 06 May 2008, 17:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by