Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 05:17

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2007
Posts: 200
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink] New post 09 May 2008, 18:15
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

80% (01:57) correct 20% (02:47) wrong based on 14 sessions
Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease. Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population. Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above?

A) The many fatal stroke and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts.

B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.

C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.

D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly.

E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind.


OA to follow.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 798
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

Re: GMAT Prep #1 - CR [#permalink] New post 09 May 2008, 18:22
A
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 322 [1] , given: 1

Premium Member
Re: GMAT Prep #1 - CR [#permalink] New post 09 May 2008, 18:33
1
This post received
KUDOS
RyanDe680 wrote:
Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease. Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population. Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above?

A) The many fatal stroke and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts.

B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.

C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.

D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly.

E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind.


OA to follow.


I really like the way Gmac make reasoning! It is really close to life! :lol:

Certain medical expense: 1000 USD
By use treament to prevent strokes and heart deaseas, you saved 1/4 that expense, it means: 1/4*1000 =200 USD

You had 200 USD saved to keep in your pockets, but you still claimed that NO ECONOMIC JUSTIFICAITON FOR THAT TREATMENT. Really funny! Do you think so? In the daily life, the author may say: should not take that the treament.

How to attack this conclusion! If you do not take that treatment, you will loss even more than the expense required of that treatment due to strokes and heart disease.

A
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2995
Followers: 57

Kudos [?]: 443 [0], given: 210

Re: GMAT Prep #1 - CR [#permalink] New post 09 May 2008, 19:47
A
RyanDe680 wrote:
Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease. <-- premise 1

Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population. <-- premise 2

Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension. <-- conclusion

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above? <-- weaken the conclusion

A) The many fatal stroke and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts. <-- BINGO

B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.

C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.

D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly.

E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind.


OA to follow.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1467
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

Re: GMAT Prep #1 - CR [#permalink] New post 10 May 2008, 06:15
RyanDe680 wrote:
Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease. Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population. Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above?

A) The many fatal stroke and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts.

B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.

C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.

D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly.

E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind.


OA to follow.



A...
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Posts: 587
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Schools: Ross '12 (MBA/MS)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 34

Re: GMAT Prep #1 - CR [#permalink] New post 11 May 2008, 00:04
A. "Large economic losses of other sorts" weakens the conclusion that "there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension".
_________________

Profile | GMAT | Erb Institute

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Posts: 47
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 4

Re: GMAT Prep #1 - CR [#permalink] New post 10 Sep 2011, 05:05
Yahsek wrote:
A. "Large economic losses of other sorts" weakens the conclusion that "there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension".


Hi can you tell me how this line 'Large economic losses of other sorts' weaken the stated conclusion
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2013
Posts: 193
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.82
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 72

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2014, 05:36
Only A and D looks good for me.

D is lack of information so i went with A

Experts please advise if i am right.

Thanks in advance,
Rrsnathan
Re: Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical   [#permalink] 07 Apr 2014, 05:36
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic A certain medication used to treat migraine headaches acts GetThisDone 5 28 Apr 2012, 19:00
3 medical treatment vjsharma25 10 22 Mar 2011, 03:43
Under a certain company's medical insurance plan, the amount Jamesk486 4 23 May 2007, 14:28
1 Aggressive fertility treatments are not responsible for the Mishari 11 25 Dec 2006, 03:12
Aggressive fertility treatments are not responsible for the gamjatang 6 09 Dec 2005, 20:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.