Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Triangle PQR is right angled at Q. QT is perpendicular to PR, where T is the point on PR. If PQ = 3cm and QR = 6cm. Find QT
1. 3/5 2. 6\sqrt{5} 3. 6/\sqrt{5} 4. 4 5. None
Look at the diagram:
Attachment:
untitled.PNG [ 5.73 KiB | Viewed 5526 times ]
You can solve this question using the fact that: perpendicular to the hypotenuse will always divide the triangle into two triangles with the same properties as the original triangle, which means that all 3 triangles PQT, QRT and PRQ are similar. Now, as in similar triangles, corresponding sides are all in the same proportion then QT/QR=PQ/PR, as \(PR=\sqrt{3^2+6^2}=\sqrt{45}=3\sqrt{5}\) then \(\frac{QT}{6}=\frac{3}{3\sqrt{5}}\) --> \(QT=\frac{6}{\sqrt{5}}\).
Or you can equate the area: \(area_{PQR}=\frac{1}{2}*PQ*QR=\frac{1}{2}*QT*PR\) --> the same here: \(PR=3\sqrt{5}\) --> \(QT=\frac{6}{\sqrt{5}}\).
Hi Bunuel, I have a small doubt regarding similarity of triangles. Could you please explain the concept in little more detail or point me to a place where i can learn the concept.
eg lets say same diagram except now QT = 4 , PT = 3 .....we have to find TR = ?
Hi Bunuel, I have a small doubt regarding similarity of triangles. Could you please explain the concept in little more detail or point me to a place where i can learn the concept.
eg lets say same diagram except now QT = 4 , PT = 3 .....we have to find TR = ?
Could you please explain this ?
If QT=4 and PT=3 --> corresponding legs in QTR and in PTQ are in the same ratio: TR/QT=QT/PT --> TR=16/3.
You can use area equation approach if you are not comfortable with similarity. _________________
Bunuel ,on your comment , corresponding legs in QTR and in PTQ are in the same ratio: TR/QT=QT/PT --> TR=16/3. When I list out propertions, its coming TR=TP, Can you explain wat did I do wrong? Thanks!
Hi Bunuel, I have a small doubt regarding similarity of triangles. Could you please explain the concept in little more detail or point me to a place where i can learn the concept.
eg lets say same diagram except now QT = 4 , PT = 3 .....we have to find TR = ?
Triangle PQR is right angled at Q. QT is perpendicular to PR, where T is the point on PR. If PQ = 3cm and QR = 6cm. Find QT
1. 3/5 2. 6\sqrt{5} 3. 6/\sqrt{5} 4. 4 5. None
Look at the diagram:
Attachment:
untitled.PNG
You can solve this question using the fact that: perpendicular to the hypotenuse will always divide the triangle into two triangles with the same properties as the original triangle, which means that all 3 triangles PQT, QRT and PRQ are similar. Now, as in similar triangles, corresponding sides are all in the same proportion then QT/QR=PQ/PR, as \(PR=\sqrt{3^2+6^2}=\sqrt{45}=3\sqrt{5}\) then \(\frac{QT}{6}=\frac{3}{3\sqrt{5}}\) --> \(QT=\frac{6}{\sqrt{5}}\).
Or you can equate the area: \(area_{PQR}=\frac{1}{2}*PQ*QR=\frac{1}{2}*QT*PR\) --> the same here: \(PR=3\sqrt{5}\) --> \(QT=\frac{6}{\sqrt{5}}\).
Answer: C.
Hi Bunuel,
I'm a little confused here. let me try to explain:
If I equate the ratios:
I get: QT/6 = 5/3Root5 I'm equating the ratios as such: the height of the QTR over the height of the the main triangle which equals, the hypotenuse of QTR to the hypotenuse of the main, which i 3 Root 5.
Can you please clarify what the ratios actually are(height of one vs. base of another etc). It's a little confusing since the variables are repeated between the 3 triangles. My worry comes in because if I did this same ratio and I equated it to QTP, i would've gotten a completely different answer. I'm surely doing something wrong -- perhaps in how i'm setting up the ratios?
Triangle PQR is right angled at Q. QT is perpendicular to PR, where T is the point on PR. If PQ = 3cm and QR = 6cm. Find QT
1. 3/5 2. 6\sqrt{5} 3. 6/\sqrt{5} 4. 4 5. None
Look at the diagram:
Attachment:
untitled.PNG
You can solve this question using the fact that: perpendicular to the hypotenuse will always divide the triangle into two triangles with the same properties as the original triangle, which means that all 3 triangles PQT, QRT and PRQ are similar. Now, as in similar triangles, corresponding sides are all in the same proportion then QT/QR=PQ/PR, as \(PR=\sqrt{3^2+6^2}=\sqrt{45}=3\sqrt{5}\) then \(\frac{QT}{6}=\frac{3}{3\sqrt{5}}\) --> \(QT=\frac{6}{\sqrt{5}}\).
Or you can equate the area: \(area_{PQR}=\frac{1}{2}*PQ*QR=\frac{1}{2}*QT*PR\) --> the same here: \(PR=3\sqrt{5}\) --> \(QT=\frac{6}{\sqrt{5}}\).
Answer: C.
Hi Bunuel,
I'm a little confused here. let me try to explain:
If I equate the ratios:
I get: QT/6 = 5/3Root5 I'm equating the ratios as such: the height of the QTR over the height of the the main triangle which equals, the hypotenuse of QTR to the hypotenuse of the main, which i 3 Root 5.
Can you please clarify what the ratios actually are(height of one vs. base of another etc). It's a little confusing since the variables are repeated between the 3 triangles. My worry comes in because if I did this same ratio and I equated it to QTP, i would've gotten a completely different answer. I'm surely doing something wrong -- perhaps in how i'm setting up the ratios?
Corresponding sides are opposite the corresponding (equal) angles. Corresponding (equal) angles are marked in the diagram below:
I'm a little confused here. let me try to explain:
If I equate the ratios:
I get: QT/6 = 5/3Root5 I'm equating the ratios as such: the height of the QTR over the height of the the main triangle which equals, the hypotenuse of QTR to the hypotenuse of the main, which i 3 Root 5.
Can you please clarify what the ratios actually are(height of one vs. base of another etc). It's a little confusing since the variables are repeated between the 3 triangles. My worry comes in because if I did this same ratio and I equated it to QTP, i would've gotten a completely different answer. I'm surely doing something wrong -- perhaps in how i'm setting up the ratios?
Corresponding sides are opposite the corresponding (equal) angles. Corresponding (equal) angles are marked in the diagram below:
I see where I was going wrong. I was only accounting to align the hypotenuse but I would switch the other two angles. Thanks for clarifying.
One question to that extent: While aligning the ratios of the 3 triangles (2 inner and 1 outer), Side A/B of Inner #1 = Side A/B of Outer = Side A/B of Inner #2 right? What I mean by that is, I can equate any of the triangles to each other - not just inner/outer but also the two inner triangles because they ALL are similar triangles. Correct?
About to start work on the links above. Thanks again.
I'm a little confused here. let me try to explain:
If I equate the ratios:
I get: QT/6 = 5/3Root5 I'm equating the ratios as such: the height of the QTR over the height of the the main triangle which equals, the hypotenuse of QTR to the hypotenuse of the main, which i 3 Root 5.
Can you please clarify what the ratios actually are(height of one vs. base of another etc). It's a little confusing since the variables are repeated between the 3 triangles. My worry comes in because if I did this same ratio and I equated it to QTP, i would've gotten a completely different answer. I'm surely doing something wrong -- perhaps in how i'm setting up the ratios?
Corresponding sides are opposite the corresponding (equal) angles. Corresponding (equal) angles are marked in the diagram below:
I see where I was going wrong. I was only accounting to align the hypotenuse but I would switch the other two angles. Thanks for clarifying.
One question to that extent: While aligning the ratios of the 3 triangles (2 inner and 1 outer), Side A/B of Inner #1 = Side A/B of Outer = Side A/B of Inner #2 right? What I mean by that is, I can equate any of the triangles to each other - not just inner/outer but also the two inner triangles because they ALL are similar triangles. Correct?
About to start work on the links above. Thanks again.
Yes, you can equate the ratios of corresponding sides in all three triangles. _________________
Re: Triangle PQR is right angled at Q. QT is perpendicular to PR [#permalink]
26 Oct 2015, 14:00
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________
The “3 golden nuggets” of MBA admission process With ten years of experience helping prospective students with MBA admissions and career progression, I will be writing this blog through...
You know what’s worse than getting a ding at one of your dreams schools . Yes its getting that horrid wait-listed email . This limbo is frustrating as hell . Somewhere...