Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 21:48

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

"True" unemployment rate at 20%

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 385
Location: Europe
Schools: St. Gallen '09
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 5

"True" unemployment rate at 20% [#permalink] New post 09 Jul 2009, 02:05
Well, I guess the real question is what information constitutes a statistic? What defines the qualification criteria?

Maybe it's a nice compromise is to take the average of both headline and U6. But, even with that, you get an unemployment rate of 13%. If you take the average of all three, including the shadow stats figure, you will get (surprisingly very close to U6) 16.8%.


http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/topst ... at-20.aspx

Quote:
Really, how hard is it to find a job? Was June's horrid numbers, in which 467,000 people lost their jobs compared to 345,000 in May, a one-time fluke? Or does it mean that all those Wall Street economists who believe the economic recovery is starting are dead wrong?

Not to scare you, but the situation is actually worse than it seems. Over the years, the government has changed the way it counts the unemployed. An example of this is the criticized Birth-Death Model which was added in 2000. The model is designed to account for the birth and death of businesses and the resultant lag in survey data. Unfortunately, the model doesn't work that well during economic contractions (like we have now) and consistently overstates the number of jobs being created each month.

John Williams of Shadow Government Statistics specializes in removing these questionable tweaks to the government's statistical data to better align current numbers with the methodology used to gather historical data. After reviewing the data, Williams believes that "the June jobs loss likely exceeded 700,000." David Rosenberg of Gluskin Sheff notes that the fall in the number of hours worked in June (to a record low of 33 per week) is equivalent to a loss of more than 800,000 jobs.
"True" unemployment rate at 20%   [#permalink] 09 Jul 2009, 02:05
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic The increase in unemployment rates, coupled with thefibonacci 6 29 Jun 2014, 01:16
3 In response to a high unemployment rate and to complaints skrishnakarthik 9 19 Oct 2013, 23:50
2 The full-time unemployment rate cannot be determined with ExecMBA2010 2 20 Feb 2010, 15:15
The full-time unemployment rate cannot be determined with lexis 13 24 Jun 2008, 01:56
4 The increase in unemployment rates, coupled with ArvGMAT 10 25 Jun 2007, 19:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

"True" unemployment rate at 20%

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.