TrueSave is a mail-order company that ships electronic : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 Jan 2017, 02:25

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# TrueSave is a mail-order company that ships electronic

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Posts: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V23
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 119 [2] , given: 15

TrueSave is a mail-order company that ships electronic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2012, 02:29
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

84% (02:18) correct 16% (01:36) wrong based on 215 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

TrueSave is a mail-order company that ships electronic products from its warehouses to customers worldwide. The company’s shipping manager is proposing that customer orders be packed with newer, more expensive packing materials that virtually eliminate damage during shipping. The manager argues that overall costs would essentially remain unaffected, since the extra cost of the new packing materials roughly equals the current cost of replacing products returned by customers because they arrived in damaged condition.

Which of the following would it be most important to ascertain in determining whether implementing the shipping manager’s proposal would have the argued-for effect on costs?

A. Whether the products shipped by TrueSave are more vulnerable to incurring
damage during shipping than are typical electronic products.
B. Whether electronic products are damaged more frequently in transit than are
most other products shipped by mail-order companies.
C. Whether a sizable proportion of returned items are returned because of damage
already present when those items were packed for shipping.
D. Whether there are cases where customers blame themselves for product
damage that, though present on arrival, isn’t discovered until later.
E. Whether TrueSave continually monitors the performance of the shipping
companies it uses to ship products to its customers

Can someone explain this one?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Posts: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V23
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 15

Re: CR question [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2012, 02:38
piyushksharma wrote:
TrueSave is a mail-order company that ships electronic products from its warehouses to customers worldwide. The company’s shipping manager is proposing that customer orders be packed with newer, more expensive packing materials that virtually eliminate damage during shipping. The manager argues that overall costs would essentially remain unaffected, since the extra cost of the new packing materials roughly equals the current cost of replacing products returned by customers because they arrived in damaged condition.

Which of the following would it be most important to ascertain in determining whether implementing the shipping manager’s proposal would have the argued-for effect on costs?

A. Whether the products shipped by TrueSave are more vulnerable to incurring
damage during shipping than are typical electronic products.
B. Whether electronic products are damaged more frequently in transit than are
most other products shipped by mail-order companies.
C. Whether a sizable proportion of returned items are returned because of damage
already present when those items were packed for shipping.
D. Whether there are cases where customers blame themselves for product
damage that, though present on arrival, isn’t discovered until later.
E. Whether TrueSave continually monitors the performance of the shipping
companies it uses to ship products to its customers

Can someone explain this one?

If the items while packing were damaged, and then those items were shipped, still TrueSave has to pay for the damaged item it was going to send to the customers. So it is important to determine that the products/items before packing were damaged or not, if they would have been damaged ones then there is no need to introduce the new packaging material, as the new packaging material would not help in rectifying the damage already caused before packing of the product.
According to me this was the what i got. If someone could tell me if it is correct interpretation of the question.
Manager
Joined: 13 Feb 2012
Posts: 144
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.67
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 107

Re: CR question [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2012, 05:27
piyushksharma wrote:
piyushksharma wrote:
TrueSave is a mail-order company that ships electronic products from its warehouses to customers worldwide. The company’s shipping manager is proposing that customer orders be packed with newer, more expensive packing materials that virtually eliminate damage during shipping. The manager argues that overall costs would essentially remain unaffected, since the extra cost of the new packing materials roughly equals the current cost of replacing products returned by customers because they arrived in damaged condition.

Which of the following would it be most important to ascertain in determining whether implementing the shipping manager’s proposal would have the argued-for effect on costs?

A. Whether the products shipped by TrueSave are more vulnerable to incurring
damage during shipping than are typical electronic products.
B. Whether electronic products are damaged more frequently in transit than are
most other products shipped by mail-order companies.
C. Whether a sizable proportion of returned items are returned because of damage
already present when those items were packed for shipping.
D. Whether there are cases where customers blame themselves for product
damage that, though present on arrival, isn’t discovered until later.
E. Whether TrueSave continually monitors the performance of the shipping
companies it uses to ship products to its customers

Can someone explain this one?

If the items while packing were damaged, and then those items were shipped, still TrueSave has to pay for the damaged item it was going to send to the customers. So it is important to determine that the products/items before packing were damaged or not, if they would have been damaged ones then there is no need to introduce the new packaging material, as the new packaging material would not help in rectifying the damage already caused before packing of the product.
According to me this was the what i got. If someone could tell me if it is correct interpretation of the question.

You are correct.
Argument : Cost of extra packaging material = cost of replacing damaged product due to transit.
If the products are damaged before transit, introducing new packaging material is more costly than the old way of packaging. => C
Hope it helps.
_________________

Kudos!!!... If you think I help you in some ways....

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 307
Followers: 522

Kudos [?]: 986 [1] , given: 2

Re: CR question [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2012, 10:22
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
The manager's plan is only viable if it saves the corporation money. The manager believes that better packaging will lead to less broken merchandise and thus less money on replacement. To determine if this plan will work, we have to determine whether there isn't a possibility that, if true, could foil his plan.

A. Whether the products shipped by TrueSave are more vulnerable to incurring
damage during shipping than are typical electronic products.

The focus is on whether the packaging will prevent damaged products and thus replacements. Even if TrueSave packages are more vulnerable to incurring damage, better packaging could prevent damage.

B. Whether electronic products are damaged more frequently in transit than are
most other products shipped by mail-order companies.

We care only about electronic products, and not other products.

C. Whether a sizable proportion of returned items are returned because of damage
already present when those items were packed for shipping. ANSWER

If there was already damage, then no amount of packaging can prevent damage. Think of it this way, even if you pack a broken DVD player in an iron safe (hardly a cost-effective shipping method ), it will still arrive damaged, and the recipient will very likely ask for a replacement. So, in order to determine how effective the manager's plan will be, we have to determine what perfect of goods were already damaged before packing.

D. Whether there are cases where customers blame themselves for product
damage that, though present on arrival, isn’t discovered until later.

If customer's blame themselves, they are unlikely to return the product.

E. Whether TrueSave continually monitors the performance of the shipping
companies it uses to ship products to its customers.

If a customer asks for a replacement, TrueSave will have to provide it, and thus lose money. Whether the company is monitoring the shipping company is moot if the packaging is flimsy.
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Getting strong now, I'm so strong now!!!
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 638
Location: India
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 98

Kudos [?]: 538 [3] , given: 80

Re: TrueSave is a mail-order company that ships electronic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2013, 11:00
3
This post received
KUDOS
New Gmat club project
Click here

_________________

Regards,

S

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10543
Followers: 920

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

Re: TrueSave is a mail-order company that ships electronic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2016, 06:11
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: TrueSave is a mail-order company that ships electronic   [#permalink] 20 Sep 2016, 06:11
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 An electronics company’s two divisions showed consistent performance o 3 03 Jan 2017, 20:07
Company X and Company Y have each been building a rocket ship able to 1 23 Sep 2015, 05:28
2 An electronics company plans to lure first-time buyers ... 3 14 Oct 2013, 07:25
4 TrueSave is a mail-order company that ships electronic 15 16 Nov 2008, 05:57
Because of rising costs, United Shipping Company raised its 19 21 Oct 2007, 14:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# TrueSave is a mail-order company that ships electronic

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.