Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 May 2013, 16:01
Customize  |  Hide

Try this....good one

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 268
Location: India
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 25

GMAT Tests User
Try this....good one [#permalink] New post 30 Jan 2010, 07:28
00:00

Question Stats:

50% (03:22) correct 50% (01:36) wrong based on 0 sessions
Try this....good one
Attachments

CR 3.PNG
CR 3.PNG [ 71.72 KiB | Viewed 668 times ]


_________________

Cheers,
SD

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 322
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 35

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - PR [#permalink] New post 30 Jan 2010, 08:29
WOW - this is good. This is how I tackled it.

Let's split the question:
1.) LD to improve car efficiency increases production. If these figures are accurate then this is huge success.
2.) A brilliant mathematician claims, that however this could not true.
So, basically from the question - one claimed to increase something by so much. if the effort was correct then success. one expert says however ain't true. the erroneous pattern here (according to me), does not explain why the expert says that the claim cannot be true.

coming to ans:
a and b are clearly out.

c) amos claim to hold his breath, but an expert says he cannot = hold it (second suspect)
d) evelyn claims she came home before midnight, but robert who knows the time (but not an expert), said she did not = this kind off argument is not stated in the q/stem
e) moira reports lee won with adam's with a distant third, an expert says it cannot be possible. he does not say why it cannot be possible.

IMO it is "E".
:roll: I'll wait for more explanations and OA.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Its Wow or Never
Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Posts: 210
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - PR [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2010, 07:35
SudiptoGmat wrote:
Try this....good one


X(Labor Deptt) claims Y(Increase in eff)
If Y(increase in eff.)-> success
Z(some third person) ->Y not possible

Option E comes closest to the pattern in the stimulus.
E. X(Moira) claims Y(Lee won with Adams a distant third)
If Y(observation that Lee won) -> Lee won
Z(lamos -third person) -> Y not possible.

E acc to me..OA?
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think you can,you can
If you think you can't,you are right.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 268
Location: India
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 25

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - PR [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2010, 09:03
mojorising800 great explanation. OA is E.

Engineer and the Senator both are not giving an reason why they are nullifying the success.
_________________

Cheers,
SD

Re: CR - PR   [#permalink] 31 Jan 2010, 09:03
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Try this one: |B+6||B5|=0 stolyar 3 06 Jun 2003, 02:09
New posts Did any one try playing ?? Geethu 0 11 Mar 2004, 09:45
New posts A factory was trying out a new process for producing one of Taku 6 23 Apr 2005, 23:52
Popular new posts Nailed It! 710 in one try! standard 17 11 Jan 2007, 02:34
New posts try this one Sergey_is_cool 2 16 May 2007, 14:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Try this....good one

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.