Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 Sep 2014, 10:15

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 154
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink] New post 27 Aug 2011, 23:46
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (02:29) correct 45% (02:04) wrong based on 11 sessions
Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were extended periods when the Darfir Republic’s currency, the pundra, was weak: its value was unusually low relative to the world’s most stable currencies. Both times a weak pundra made Darfir’s manufactured products a bargain on world markets, and Darfir’s exports were up substantially. Now some politicians are saying that, in order to cause another similarly sized increase in exports, the government should allow the pundra to become weak again.

Which of the following, if true, provides the government with the strongest grounds to doubt that the politicians’ recommendation, if followed, will achieve its aim?

A) Several of the politicians now recommending that the pundra be allowed to become weak made that same recommendation before each of the last two periods of currency weakness.

B) After several decades of operating well below peak capacity, Darfir’s manufacturing sector is now operating at near-peak levels.

C) The economy of a country experiencing a rise in exports will become healthier only if the country’s currency is strong or the rise in exports is significant.

D) Those countries whose manufactured products compete with Darfir’s on the world market all currently have stable currencies.

E) A sharp improvement in the efficiency of Darfir’s manufacturing plants would make Darfir’s products a bargain on world markets even without any weakening of the pundra relative to other currencies.

I have a doubt regarding choice E.generally Powerscore CR Bible recommends that to weaken a CR an alternate caouse should be present for the desired effect

politicians reason that: weaken currency(cause) -> exports up again (effect)
so in choice E we present so other cause "improvement in the efficiency of Darfir’s manufacturing plants " to impreve the exports...

This question has been discussed a lot in other forums but i just want to know why choice E is wrong.

One can see Ron's explanation in below forum
http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/tough-cr-t2329.html
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 4

Re: Weaken Conclusion [#permalink] New post 28 Aug 2011, 00:22
Please focus on the conclusion:
Devaluing the currency will make the country manufacturers more competitive in the world market, increasing export sales.

Of course, gov has many policies to boost export sales: increase productivity, ease credit criteria... but the argument just talks about currency value. Hence the point in E does not directly attack the conclusion so it should not be chosen.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 154
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: Weaken Conclusion [#permalink] New post 28 Aug 2011, 01:41
well i am confused.What about the method used by the Powerscope.an alternate explanation for the desired effect.
Math Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2047
Followers: 128

Kudos [?]: 925 [0], given: 376

GMAT Tests User
Re: Weaken Conclusion [#permalink] New post 28 Aug 2011, 02:18
mrinal2100 wrote:
Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were extended periods when the Darfir Republic’s currency, the pundra, was weak: its value was unusually low relative to the world’s most stable currencies. Both times a weak pundra made Darfir’s manufactured products a bargain on world markets, and Darfir’s exports were up substantially. Now some politicians are saying that, in order to cause another similarly sized increase in exports, the government should allow the pundra to become weak again.

Which of the following, if true, provides the government with the strongest grounds to doubt that the politicians’ recommendation, if followed, will achieve its aim?

A) Several of the politicians now recommending that the pundra be allowed to become weak made that same recommendation before each of the last two periods of currency weakness.

B) After several decades of operating well below peak capacity, Darfir’s manufacturing sector is now operating at near-peak levels.

C) The economy of a country experiencing a rise in exports will become healthier only if the country’s currency is strong or the rise in exports is significant.

D) Those countries whose manufactured products compete with Darfir’s on the world market all currently have stable currencies.

E) A sharp improvement in the efficiency of Darfir’s manufacturing plants would make Darfir’s products a bargain on world markets even without any weakening of the pundra relative to other currencies.

I have a doubt regarding choice E.generally Powerscore CR Bible recommends that to weaken a CR an alternate caouse should be present for the desired effect

politicians reason that: weaken currency(cause) -> exports up again (effect)
so in choice E we present so other cause "improvement in the efficiency of Darfir’s manufacturing plants " to impreve the exports...

This question has been discussed a lot in other forums but i just want to know why choice E is wrong.

One can see Ron's explanation in below forum
http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/tough-cr-t2329.html


This question and in fact >90% GMAT Prep, OG, MGMAT questions are discussed in gmatclub.com.

You must search and reply to an existing thread.
common-posting-ethics-119627.html

This thread will be temporarily locked and later deleted.

Users are advised not to create a thread just for the sake of asking a question for which they have not found an explanation. If user creates a thread with a question that already exists, the thread will be deleted and warning will be issued.
_________________

~fluke

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Re: Weaken Conclusion   [#permalink] 28 Aug 2011, 02:18
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
14 Experts publish their posts in the topic Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were maybeam 8 19 Jul 2012, 10:24
Experts publish their posts in the topic Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were madGMAT 2 19 Jan 2012, 22:27
1 Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were prasannar 16 06 Apr 2008, 04:44
Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were Swagatalakshmi 13 28 Feb 2007, 23:57
1 Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were joemama142000 22 24 Apr 2006, 05:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.