Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Sep 2014, 02:19

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Twenty years ago the Republic of Rosinia produced nearly 100

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Affiliations: PMI, ASQ
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 119
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Followers: 127

Kudos [?]: 721 [0], given: 21

GMAT ToolKit User
Twenty years ago the Republic of Rosinia produced nearly 100 [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2012, 05:11
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

50% (02:44) correct 50% (01:32) wrong based on 233 sessions
Twenty years ago the Republic of Rosinia produced nearly 100 million tons of potatoes, but last year the harvest barely reached 60 million tons. Agricultural researchers, who have failed to develop new higher-yielding strains of potatoes, are to blame for this decrease, since they have been concerned only with their own research and not with the needs of Rosinia.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) Any current attempts by agricultural researchers to develop higher-yielding potato strains are futile.
(B) Strains of potatoes most commonly grown in Rosinia could not have produced the yieldslast year that they once did.
(C) Agricultural researchers often find concrete solutions to practical problems when investigating seemingly unrelated questions.
(D) Wide fluctuations in the size of the potato crop over a twenty-year period are not unusual.
(E) Agricultural research in Rosinia is funded by government grants.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Legendary Collections
1. 700 Level Quant 2. IIM Quant 3. 100 CR from LSAT 4. 100 Legendary SC 5. 5000 Practice problems 6.125 Quant 7. 38 SC 8. 10 Full Length GMAT Pen&Paper Tests
9. 1500+ RC 10. 100 Legendary CR 11. Additional Verbal Qs 12. Additional Quant Qs

My debrief |Free essay review initiative
PM me for One-on-One Webex Tutoring

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: faciendo quod indiget fieri
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 88
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [2] , given: 4

Re: Twenty years ago the Republic of Rosinia [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2012, 06:14
2
This post received
KUDOS
Legendaddy wrote:
Twenty years ago the Republic of Rosinia produced nearly 100 million tons of potatoes, but last year the harvest barely reached 60 million tons. Agricultural researchers, who have failed to develop new higher-yielding strains of potatoes, are to blame for this decrease, since they have been concerned only with their own research and not with the needs of Rosinia.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) Any current attempts by agricultural researchers to develop higher-yielding potato strains are futile.
out of scope as it mentions no where that whether the effort now will be futile or fruitful
(B) Strains of potatoes most commonly grown in Rosinia could not have produced the yieldslast year that they once did.
Correct answer. As this is required to put the blame on the researchers as it has been done in the argument. Without this assumption the argument falls apart,as there could be many reasons for low yield such as rain, not enough effort by the farmers, crop disease etc. By stating this all those reasons are eliminated since it says that WHATEVER MAY HAPPEN yield could not have been more than this.
(C) Agricultural researchers often find concrete solutions to practical problems when investigating seemingly unrelated questions.
out of scope
(D) Wide fluctuations in the size of the potato crop over a twenty-year period are not unusual.
contradicts the argument
(E) Agricultural research in Rosinia is funded by government grants.
out of scope


Hope you find this useful :)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 May 2012
Posts: 77
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 16

Re: Twenty years ago the Republic of Rosinia produced nearly 100 [#permalink] New post 01 Oct 2012, 14:49
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 464
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT 1: Q V0
GPA: 3.23
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 11

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Twenty years ago the Republic of Rosinia produced nearly 100 [#permalink] New post 06 Oct 2012, 00:36
20 yrs ago's yield: 100 m tons
last yrs' yield: 60 m tons
Agricultural researchers are to blame for this decrease (failure to develop new higher yielding strains)

ASSUMPTION:
The strains are not high yielding (What the strains are high yielding but some other external factors interrupted)
(B) is correct!

(A) Any current attempts by agricultural researchers to develop higher-yielding potato strains are futile.
Not all attempts are futile. Futile in what sense, perhaps they were able to discover something else despite failure to create a high yield strain... Whether futile or not futile, it has no bearing on the conclusion that they are to blame for the reason stated by the author

(C) Agricultural researchers often find concrete solutions to practical problems when investigating seemingly unrelated questions.
Apply assumption negation. Agricultural researchers always find concrete solutions to practical problems. Does this cause the argument to fall apart? They are still to blame if the strains of potatoes are not of high-yield. Still holds!

(D) Wide fluctuations in the size of the potato crop over a twenty-year period are not unusual.
Potato Size - is irrelevant to potatoes yield in volume

(E) Agricultural research in Rosinia is funded by government grants
government grants is no where hinted in the argument. so this needs not be assumed.
_________________

Impossible is nothing to God.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2013
Posts: 50
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 7

Re: Twenty years ago the Republic of Rosinia produced nearly 100 [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2014, 15:31
hi,

im confused with this :
i know that the assumption is a new piece of information (so it can not be a rephrasing to a premise or conclusion)
answer B "Strains of potatoes most commonly grown in Rosinia could not have produced the yieldslast year that they once did" is a rephrasing to the premise (but last year the harvest barely reached 60 million tons). in the premise we can see that last year the production is less than it used to be.
so, how can answer B an assumption ??? it is more an inference than an assumption .
can any one explain that please ?

thanks
Re: Twenty years ago the Republic of Rosinia produced nearly 100   [#permalink] 14 Jun 2014, 15:31
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
For nearly twenty years, the Mubarak government turned a emmak 4 08 Jun 2013, 00:34
3 Twenty years ago the Republic of Rosinia produced nearly 100 noboru 24 20 May 2010, 13:05
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic CR Twenty years ago. Vavali 14 29 Mar 2008, 13:34
Republic of Rosinia computer-bot 15 16 May 2007, 17:26
Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations chunjuwu 0 27 Dec 2004, 09:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Twenty years ago the Republic of Rosinia produced nearly 100

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.