|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Posts: 29
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
4
[1] , given: 0
|
Two groups of laboratory mice were injected with cancerous [#permalink]
26 Apr 2010, 21:01
1
This post received KUDOS
Question Stats:
61% (01:42) correct
38% (01:12) wrong based on 0 sessions
Two groups of laboratory mice were injected with cancerous cells. One group’s cages were rotated in a disorienting manner. Two-thirds of these mice developed cancers. One-tenth of the mice in stationary cages developed cancers. The researchers concluded that stress enhances the development of cancer in laboratory mice. The researchers’ conclusion logically depends on which of the following assumptions? (A) Rotating the cages in disorienting manner produced stress in the mice in those cages. (B) The injections given to the two groups of mice were not of equal strength. (C) Injecting the mice with cancerous cells caused stress in the mice. (D) Even without the injections the mice in the rotated cages would have developed cancers. (E) Even the rotation of cages in a manner that is not disorienting is likely to produce stress in mice in those cages.
Please elaborate with reasoning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 301
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
50
[1] , given: 0
|
Re: CR assumption question [#permalink]
27 Apr 2010, 00:10
1
This post received KUDOS
poohv005 wrote: Two groups of laboratory mice were injected with cancerous cells. One group’s cages were rotated in a disorienting manner. Two-thirds of these mice developed cancers. One-tenth of the mice in stationary cages developed cancers. The researchers concluded that stress enhances the development of cancer in laboratory mice. The researchers’ conclusion logically depends on which of the following assumptions? (A) Rotating the cages in disorienting manner produced stress in the mice in those cages. (B) The injections given to the two groups of mice were not of equal strength. (C) Injecting the mice with cancerous cells caused stress in the mice. (D) Even without the injections the mice in the rotated cages would have developed cancers. (E) Even the rotation of cages in a manner that is not disorienting is likely to produce stress in mice in those cages.
Please elaborate with reasoning. Mice Injected >>> Disoriented Rotation >>> Stress >>> Cancer
Only A supports the sequence of event, by asserting that "rotation of cage causes stress"
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1570
Followers: 12
Kudos [?]:
121
[0], given: 6
|
Re: CR assumption question [#permalink]
27 Apr 2010, 13:19
A it is.
nverma already explained it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 959
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 38
Kudos [?]:
555
[1] , given: 40
|
Re: CR assumption question [#permalink]
28 Apr 2010, 05:19
1
This post received KUDOS
IMO A. poohv005 wrote: Two groups of laboratory mice were injected with cancerous cells. One group’s cages were rotated in a disorienting manner. Two-thirds of these mice developed cancers. One-tenth of the mice in stationary cages developed cancers. The researchers concluded that stress enhances the development of cancer in laboratory mice. The researchers’ conclusion logically depends on which of the following assumptions? (A) Rotating the cages in disorienting manner produced stress in the mice in those cages. [Correct. A proper cause (cage rotation) >> effect (stress) is shown here] (B) The injections given to the two groups of mice were not of equal strength. [We dont know if it anyhow related with stress. Incorrect] (C) Injecting the mice with cancerous cells caused stress in the mice. [This is Shell Game Fallacy. What about the stationery caged mice. They should be in 2/3 ratio. Incorrect] (D) Even without the injections the mice in the rotated cages would have developed cancers. [We are not given this info on no injection. This is contradicting the data. Incorrect] (E) Even the rotation of cages in a manner that is not disorienting is likely to produce stress in mice in those cages. [This is a case of alternate cause for same effect (stress). Remember, there has to be only one cause for a stated effect.Incorrect]
Please elaborate with reasoning.
_________________
Want to improve your CR: cr-methods-an-approach-to-find-the-best-answers-93146.html Tricky Quant problems: 50-tricky-questions-92834.html Important Grammer Fundamentals: key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 197
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
30
[0], given: 1
|
Re: CR assumption question [#permalink]
29 Apr 2010, 05:28
perhaps the easiest of the LSAT questions...A sure it is
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 657
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
58
[0], given: 51
|
Re: CR assumption question [#permalink]
07 May 2011, 15:29
A in 0:41 min , this is sub-200 level question
_________________
What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 192
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
18
[0], given: 40
|
Re: CR assumption question [#permalink]
07 May 2011, 17:59
Very easy to be a LSAT question. But still (A).
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1756
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 50
Kudos [?]:
145
[0], given: 108
|
Re: CR assumption question [#permalink]
09 May 2011, 10:55
+1 A That's right, it is a sub 600 level question.
_________________
"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."
My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1400
Followers: 8
Kudos [?]:
84
[0], given: 10
|
Re: CR assumption question [#permalink]
09 May 2011, 22:01
A negating this clearly crashes the conclusion.
_________________
Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/ Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Status: GMAT Learner
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 672
Followers: 21
Kudos [?]:
108
[0], given: 31
|
Re: Two groups of laboratory mice were injected with cancerous [#permalink]
12 Dec 2011, 07:44
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal GMAT Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 787
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Finance
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 18
Kudos [?]:
80
[0], given: 35
|
Re: Two groups of laboratory mice were injected with cancerous [#permalink]
12 Dec 2011, 22:02
Choice A connect the bridge between the rotating cages and cancer. That is stress.
_________________
Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 283
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
13
[0], given: 110
|
Re: CR assumption question [#permalink]
23 Dec 2011, 05:48
garimavyas wrote: this is sub-200 level question Does below 200 exist in GMAT? I thought the lowest possible score in GMAT was 200.  Btw, I agree with A, though I would "classify" this problem as "sub-600-level", if at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 186
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
20
[0], given: 6
|
Re: Two groups of laboratory mice were injected with cancerous [#permalink]
26 Dec 2011, 03:24
A .. connects dot between stress and cancerous
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 25 Sep 2010
Posts: 85
Schools: HBS, LBS, Wharton, Kelloggs, Booth
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 15
|
Re: Two groups of laboratory mice were injected with cancerous [#permalink]
23 Jan 2012, 06:40
Premises: Two groups of laboratory mice were injected with cancerous cells. (Let us say Group1)One group’s cages were rotated in a disorienting manner. Two-thirds of these mice developed cancers. (Let us say group 2) One-tenth of the mice in stationary cages developed cancers.
Conclusion - The researchers concluded that stress enhances the development of cancer in laboratory mice. The researchers’ conclusion logically depends on which of the following assumptions? (A) Rotating the cages in disorienting manner produced stress in the mice in those cages. (B) The injections given to the two groups of mice were not of equal strength. (C) Injecting the mice with cancerous cells caused stress in the mice. (D) Even without the injections the mice in the rotated cages would have developed cancers. (E) Even the rotation of cages in a manner that is not disorienting is likely to produce stress in mice in those cages.
We can see from the premises that the incidences of cancer in group 1 were more than group 2. just keep in mind that this has something to do with rotation in a disorienting manner. Conclusion talks about stress. Missing link: relationship between disorienting rotation and stress
Disorienting rotation--cancer + (Assumption) ----> Stress---> cancer Hence, A B. Wrong because wither group could have gotten the injection with more strength. C. in this case, both groups have an equal chance of getting cancer D. out of scope E. this compares oriented rotation. has nothing to do with disoriented rotation vs stationary.
OR just use LEN technique on A (A) Rotating the cages in disorienting manner had not necessarily produced stress in the mice in those cages. the conclusion falls apart.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 145
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 24
|
Re: Two groups of laboratory mice were injected with cancerous [#permalink]
23 Jan 2012, 10:33
Clear A but not sub 600 I'd say 650-700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Two groups of laboratory mice were injected with cancerous
[#permalink]
23 Jan 2012, 10:33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|