Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Sep 2014, 17:40

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
4 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 905
Concentration: General Management, General Management
Schools: ISB '16
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 203 [4] , given: 312

Premium Member CAT Tests
Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit [#permalink] New post 19 Jan 2013, 22:16
4
This post received
KUDOS
10
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

25% (02:39) correct 75% (01:36) wrong based on 908 sessions
Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit the woods near the town of Millerton. Because the red-brown worm's coloring affords it better camouflage from predatory birds, its population in 1980 was approximately five times that of the black worm. In 1990, a factory was built in Millerton and emissions from the factory blackened much of the woods. The population of black earthworms is now almost equal to that of the red-brown earthworm, a result, say local ecologists, solely stemming from the blackening of the woods.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion of the local ecologists?

A]The number of red-brown earthworms in the Millerton woods has steadily dropped since the factory began operations.
B]The birds that prey on earthworms prefer black worms to red-brown worms.
C]Climate conditions since 1990 have been more favorable to the survival of the red-brown worm than to the black worm.
D] The average life span of the earthworms has remained the same since the factory began operations.
E]Since the factory took steps to reduce emissions six months ago, there has been a slight increase in the earthworm population.

source:Veritas prep

What is wrong with option
[Reveal] Spoiler:
(A).
As we have to prove that after factory operations the red ones were more visible than the black ones ,so this should provide support to "Black = Red solely stemming from the" blackening of the woods."
Knowing that factory operations was the cause of " blackening of the woods."
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Veritas Prep GMAT Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesKaplan GMAT Prep Discount Codes
24 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1066
Location: United States
Followers: 121

Kudos [?]: 1276 [24] , given: 119

Premium Member
Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit [#permalink] New post 19 Apr 2013, 22:43
24
This post received
KUDOS
Tough question. This is an example of the combination of CAUSES & EFFECTS and COMPARISON.

MAIN IDEA:

Before event A, X is less than Y.
After event A, X and Y are equal
Conclusion: Event A causes X increase.

Assumption: Y does not decrease itself or there's NO factors make Y decrease.

Negation to confirm: If Y decreases itself ==> cannot say Event A causes X increase (because X is the same, only Y decreases to make two variables are equal).

CONSIDER EACH ANSWER:

(A) The number of red-brown earthworms in the Millerton woods has steadily dropped since the factory began operations.
Wrong. Actually A weakens the conclusionn not strengthen because it says red-brown earthworms decreased by itself.

(B) The birds that prey on earthworms prefer black worms to red-brown worms.
Wrong.. Shell game. Birds prefer black worms ==> why birds prefer black worms, because birds can see black worms ==> if they cannot see black worms, how can they prefer them? ==> we can infer that the blackening of the woods does not play any role to help black worms.

(C) Climate conditions since 1990 have been more favorable to the survival of the red-brown worm than to the black worm.
Correct. C definitely says the number of red worms does not decrease, even red worms increased their population more than in 1980 ==> However, the number of black worms equals to that of red worms ==> the the blackening of the woods must play an important role to help black worms.

(D) The average life span of the earthworms has remained the same since the factory began operations.
Wrong.. D only says the AVERAGE life span of earthworms unchanged. Let analyze an example.

Before: The number of Red earthworms is five times that of Black earthworms. (100 vs 20)
There are 20 Black earthworms (BW), their life span is 11 days
There are 100 Red earthworms (RW), their life span is 5 days
Average life span = [20*11 + 100*5] / 120 = 6 days

After. The number of Red earthworms equals that of Black earthworms. (20 vs 20)
There are 20 BW, their life span is 11 days
There are 20 RW, their life span is 1 day (Let say, Emission from factory affected only RW, leading to RW reduced both its number and its life span. Blackening did not affect BW at all)
Average life span = [20*11 + 20*1] /40 = 6 days

(E) Since the factory took steps to reduce emissions six months ago, there has been a slight increase in the earthworm population.
Wrong.. Apposite answer. Factory reduces emission ==> woods are less blacken ==> But the number of earthworm increase ==> the blackening of the woods does not play any role.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.


Last edited by pqhai on 20 Apr 2013, 10:57, edited 4 times in total.
Expert Post
15 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Preparing for the another shot...!
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1425
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 127

Kudos [?]: 616 [15] , given: 62

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown [#permalink] New post 25 Jan 2013, 01:43
15
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Let us first look at answer choice C and try to understand how does it strengthens the conclusion of ecologists.
Conclusion:The result says that the population of black earthworms is now almost equal to that of the red-brown earthworm, solely stemming from the blackening of the woods.
C says that "Climate conditions since 1990 have been more favorable to the survival of the red-brown worm than to the black worm".
Since climate favours the survival of red-brown worm than to the black worm, then chances are quite high that the # of red-brown worms must be very high if compared to that of black worm. Even then, the # of black worms is equal to # of red-brown worms, then something must have been wrong and some factor has played a role. What C does is that it eliminates any other chance and brings to us that the only way # of red-brown worms is equal to # of black worms is due to the blackening of woods.

Regards.
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting
www.Univ-Scholarships.com

Expert Post
5 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Posts: 1177
Location: India
City: Pune
GPA: 3.4
WE: Business Development (Manufacturing)
Followers: 144

Kudos [?]: 911 [5] , given: 869

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2013, 20:04
5
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
TGC wrote:
Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit the woods near the town of Millerton. Because the red-brown worm's coloring affords it better camouflage from predatory birds, its population in 1980 was approximately five times that of the black worm. In 1990, a factory was built in Millerton and emissions from the factory blackened much of the woods. The population of black earthworms is now almost equal to that of the red-brown earthworm, a result, say local ecologists, solely stemming from the blackening of the woods.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion of the local ecologists?

A]The number of red-brown earthworms in the Millerton woods has steadily dropped since the factory began operations.
B]The birds that prey on earthworms prefer black worms to red-brown worms.
C]Climate conditions since 1990 have been more favorable to the survival of the red-brown worm than to the black worm.
D] The average life span of the earthworms has remained the same since the factory began operations.
E]Since the factory took steps to reduce emissions six months ago, there has been a slight increase in the earthworm population.

source:Veritas prep

What is wrong with option
[Reveal] Spoiler:
(A).
As we have to prove that after factory operations the red ones were more visible than the black ones ,so this should provide support to "Black = Red solely stemming from the" blackening of the woods."
Knowing that factory operations was the cause of " blackening of the woods."


A great answer from pqhai to a great question. I would only add my few points in it.

IMO, this question though worded as strengthen question is actually testing whether we can figure out the defender assumptions the author has made while drawing the conclusion.

Brief about Defender Assumptions

In general there are two types of assumptions.

1) Supporter Assumption :- This types of assumptions are common and plays traditional linking role - connecting the pieces of the arguments to one another by usually providing new information and filling out the gap between premises and conclusion.

2) Defender Assumptions :- These are of altogether different type. They protect the argument by eliminating the ideas that could weaken the argument.

Consider the following argument :- People who read a lot are more intelligent than other people. Thus, reading must cause a person to be intelligent.

Following are some of the statements that could attack the above conclusion
1) Regular exercise causes a person to be intelligent.
2) A high-protein diet causes a person to be intelligent.

So to hold the conclusion true, author assumes that the above scenarios do not exist.
1) Regular exercise does not cause a person to be intelligent
2) A high-protein diet does not cause a person to be intelligent.


So we can infer that defender assumptions are basically eliminates the possibility of any alternate explanation for the given effect.


Back to the question...........

Premise 1 :- During 1980s population of red-worms was approx 5 times that of black worms, because the coloring of red-worms was matching with the surrounding environment (esp tree's woods) and protecting them from predators.

Premise 2 :- During 1990s emissions from newly built factory blackened much of the woods. This change took back the color match advantage that red-worms were getting till date.

Premise 3 :- At the same time population of red worms became almost equal to that of black worms.

Conclusion :- The decrease in the population of red-worms is due to the blackening of the woods.

Here the ecologist attributed the decrease of red-worms' population solely to the blackening of the woods caused by emission. So while drawing this conclusion he must have assumed that any alternate explanation for the decrease in population of red-worms does not exists.

Since we are told to strengthen the ecologist's conclusion, our job is to refute the possibility of any alternate explanation.

Choice A :- INCORRECT. Shell Game Answer. This choice merely restates the premise. It does not add any new information that would affect the conclusion.

Choice B :- INCORRECT. This choice does not make any sense with the conclusion. If the predators had preferred black worms over red-worms then the population of red-worms certainly would have not dropped substantially.

Choice C :- CORRECT. Changed environmental condition could also be the cause of decrease in red-worms' population. THIS CHOICE eliminates the possibility of existence of such scenario and makes the ecologist's conclusion valid.

Choice D :- INCORRECT. irrelevant

Choice E :- INCORRECT. irrelevant.
_________________

Be the coolest guy in the MBA Forum - Be a threadmaster!

Have a blog? Feature it on GMAT Club!

All MBA Resources All 'Sticky' Topics at one place

Please share your profiles for this application season: 2015 Profiles w/ Admit/Dings Results!

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Next Generation GMATClub CATS with Brilliant Analytics.


Expert Post
3 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Preparing for the another shot...!
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1425
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 127

Kudos [?]: 616 [3] , given: 62

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown [#permalink] New post 19 Jan 2013, 22:55
3
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Actually, IMO, A weakens the argument.
A says that the number of red worms decreased steadily. So it brings up another factor behind the equalling of the number of black and red worms. Chances can be quite high that because of the factory operations, the # of red worms decreased. So where is the factor of "blackening of wood"? Hence it weakens.
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting
www.Univ-Scholarships.com

3 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1066
Location: United States
Followers: 121

Kudos [?]: 1276 [3] , given: 119

Premium Member
Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit [#permalink] New post 21 Apr 2013, 22:26
3
This post received
KUDOS
umeshpatil wrote:
pqhai, +2 kudos for you :lol: . Very Nice explanation for this difficult question.

Do you have any generic suggestion to deal with CAUSES & EFFECTS and COMPARISON


Dear umeshpatil:
Thank you so much. I really appreciate!!! :).

I guess you have practiced a lot for CR. However, from my own experience, there are two very popular types of cause and effect OR C&F with comparison in GMAT.

TYPE 1: Cause and Effect between A & B.
Logic of GMAC is:
If A and B both occur.
Conclusion: A causes B happen.
Assumption is: B does not cause A happen.

For example: People who have high GMAT score test always wear nearsighted glasses.
Conclusion: wearing nearsighted glasses makes people get high GMAT score.
Assumption: Having high GMAT score does not make people have eyes problem, leading to wearing nearsighted glasses.

TYPE 2: Mix of Cause & Effect AND comparison.
Logic of GMAC is:
Before Event X: A was LESS than B.
After Event X: A equals B. OR A is larger than B.
Conclusion: X must cause A increase.
Assumption is: No factors make B decrease


For example: Like the question we discuss in this thread.

You will see the two question types above present in CR over and over again. When you see two things both happen, and then conclude A causes B. Or when you see before event A, after event X ==> think about cause and effect. You can pick the correct answer in your mind, even when you haven't seen the answers.

I Hope it helps you a little bit.

Regards.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

2 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1066
Location: United States
Followers: 121

Kudos [?]: 1276 [2] , given: 119

Premium Member
Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit [#permalink] New post 20 Apr 2013, 10:45
2
This post received
KUDOS
BangOn wrote:
I understand why C is better but can you help me explain why D is bad?
Another POV can be that since life spans have not changed, so blackening is doing the damage. This is like other things remaining same, blackening is an issue.


VERY GOOD question!
Sorry for not explaining D. Here is it.

D only says the AVERAGE life span of earthworms unchanged. Let analyze an example.

Before: The number of Red earthworms is five times that of Black earthworms. (100 vs 20)

There are 20 Black earthworms (BW), their life span is 11 days
There are 100 Red earthworms (RW), their life span is 5 days
Average life span = [20*11 + 100*5] / 120 = 6 days

After. The number of Red earthworms equals that of Black earthworms. (20 vs 20)

There are 20 BW, their life span is 11 days
There are 20 RW, their life span is 1 day (Let say, Emission from factory affected only RW, leading to RW reduced both its number and its life span. Blackening did not affect BW at all)
Average life span = [20*11 + 20*1] /40 = 6 days

Now you understand why AVERAGE life span does not help anything?

Hope it helps you.

Regards.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2085
Followers: 513

Kudos [?]: 2110 [2] , given: 30

Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit [#permalink] New post 15 May 2014, 13:06
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
TGC wrote:
Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit the woods near the town of Millerton. Because the red-brown worm's coloring affords it better camouflage from predatory birds, its population in 1980 was approximately five times that of the black worm. In 1990, a factory was built in Millerton and emissions from the factory blackened much of the woods. The population of black earthworms is now almost equal to that of the red-brown earthworm, a result, say local ecologists, solely stemming from the blackening of the woods.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion of the local ecologists?

A] The number of red-brown earthworms in the Millerton woods has steadily dropped since the factory began operations.
B] The birds that prey on earthworms prefer black worms to red-brown worms.
C] Climate conditions since 1990 have been more favorable to the survival of the red-brown worm than to the black worm.
D] The average life span of the earthworms has remained the same since the factory began operations.
E] Since the factory took steps to reduce emissions six months ago, there has been a slight increase in the earthworm population.

kinjiGC wrote:
Hi Mike,
Can you please explain why Option B) is wrong here :
Thanks,
Kinjal

Dear Kinjal,
I'm happy to respond. :-) I will note that Marcab, pqhai, and Narenn have all made excellent comments on this question.

Conclusion: "The population of black earthworms is now almost equal to that of the red-brown earthworm, a result, say local ecologists, SOLELY stemming from the blackening of the woods."
That highlighted word, "solely," is a hugely important word in this conclusion. We are trying to claim that the two type of earthworms now have close to equal population because of the blackening of the woods AND because of absolutely nothing else. That's the conclusion we are trying to support.

Let's look at (B):
(B) The birds that prey on earthworms prefer black worms to red-brown worms.
First of all, if the birds are eating the black worms, they must be seeing them, which means that the blackening isn't really doing much to protect them. Moreover, we have here one predator, the birds, applying selective pressure on the black earthworms, pushing there population down. In order for the two types of earthworms to be more-or-less equal in population, either something else must be accounting for more black earthworms, or something else must be accounting for fewer red-brown earthworms. Something else. Is it the blackening of the woods? Other predators? Environmental conditions? Maybe. We don't know. This is, at best, a pretty lame strengthener, because the most we can conclude is that something is hurting the red-brown earthworms or helping the black earthworms, but we don't know what.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 4759
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1112

Kudos [?]: 5035 [2] , given: 164

Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2014, 00:48
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
TGC wrote:
Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit the woods near the town of Millerton. Because the red-brown worm's coloring affords it better camouflage from predatory birds, its population in 1980 was approximately five times that of the black worm. In 1990, a factory was built in Millerton and emissions from the factory blackened much of the woods. The population of black earthworms is now almost equal to that of the red-brown earthworm, a result, say local ecologists, solely stemming from the blackening of the woods.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion of the local ecologists?

A]The number of red-brown earthworms in the Millerton woods has steadily dropped since the factory began operations.
B]The birds that prey on earthworms prefer black worms to red-brown worms.
C]Climate conditions since 1990 have been more favorable to the survival of the red-brown worm than to the black worm.
D] The average life span of the earthworms has remained the same since the factory began operations.
E]Since the factory took steps to reduce emissions six months ago, there has been a slight increase in the earthworm population.

source:Veritas prep

What is wrong with option
[Reveal] Spoiler:
(A).
As we have to prove that after factory operations the red ones were more visible than the black ones ,so this should provide support to "Black = Red solely stemming from the" blackening of the woods."
Knowing that factory operations was the cause of " blackening of the woods."


As requested, here are my thoughts on the question:

Premises:
Two types of worms - red and black
Red has better camouflage from predatory birds and hence its population was 5 times that of black
Factory has blackened woods and now population of both is same (implying that black has better camouflage than before now due to blackening of woods)

Conclusion:
Blackening of woods (and hence better camouflage from predatory birds) is solely responsible for equalization of the two populations.

We need to strengthen the conclusion. Note that there is no doubt that blackening of the woods is responsible for equalization of populations. The question is whether it is solely responsible.

Option (C) tells you that another factor that could have had an effect (i.e. climate) is not responsible. This strengthens the conclusion that better camouflage is SOLELY responsible. It doesn't prove the conclusion beyond doubt since there could still be another factor that could be responsible but it does discard one of the other factors. So it does improve the probability of the conclusion being true.

Note that option (B) strengthens that 'blackening of the woods is responsible for equalization of population' but it DOES NOT strengthen that 'blackening of the woods is SOLELY responsible for equalization'. - That is where the difference lies between (B) and (C)
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Save $100 on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Jan 2011
Posts: 12
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 9

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown [#permalink] New post 19 Apr 2013, 16:46
1
This post received
KUDOS
Marcab wrote:
Since climate favours the survival of red-brown worm than to the black worm, then chances are quite high that the # of red-brown worms must be very high if compared to that of black worm. Even then, the # of black worms is equal to # of red-brown worms, then something must have been wrong and some factor has played a role. What C does is that it eliminates any other chance and brings to us that the only way # of red-brown worms is equal to # of black worms is due to the blackening of woods.

Regards.


I can say the same thing with B: "The birds that prey on earthworms prefer black worms to red-brown worms." B also suggests, just like C, that despite birds' preference to black worms, they are now equal in number to red brown worms. This can strengthen the conclusion well.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 May 2012
Posts: 166
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 65 [1] , given: 69

CAT Tests
Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit [#permalink] New post 21 Apr 2013, 15:27
1
This post received
KUDOS
pqhai, +2 kudos for you :lol: . Very Nice explanation for this difficult question.

Do you have any generic suggestion to deal with CAUSES & EFFECTS and COMPARISON
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 905
Concentration: General Management, General Management
Schools: ISB '16
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 312

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown [#permalink] New post 19 Jan 2013, 23:11
In 1990, a factory was built in Millerton and emissions from the factory blackened much of the woods. The population of black earthworms is now almost equal to that of the red-brown earthworm, a result, say local ecologists, solely stemming from the blackening of the woods.

Premise states that due to
"Red Color" of wood red -worms were not easily preyed upon,while the blacks were so R = 5 times the B

As stated in RED quoted above .

Industry set -up => Blackening of woods => easy contrast for REDS bad contrast for BLACKS => Drop in numbers of RED which supports the conclusion in green ,this causal relation as I mentioned above supports the conclusion . Doesn't it?
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown [#permalink] New post 25 Jan 2013, 01:13
hey...even i think that the answer should be A....Can someone explain Y the ans is C?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown [#permalink] New post 25 Jan 2013, 02:17
great explanation...thanx alot...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2012
Posts: 138
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 22

Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit [#permalink] New post 20 Apr 2013, 01:24
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
pqhai wrote:
Tough question. This is an example of the combination of CAUSES & EFFECTS and COMPARISON.

MAIN IDEA:

Before event A, X is less than Y.
After event A, X and Y are equal
Conclusion: Event A causes X increase.

Assumption: Y does not decrease itself or there's NO factors make Y decrease.

Negation to confirm: If Y decreases itself ==> cannot say Event A causes X increase (because X is the same, only Y decreases to make two variables are equal).

CONSIDER EACH ANSWER:

(A) The number of red-brown earthworms in the Millerton woods has steadily dropped since the factory began operations.
Wrong. Actually A weakens the conclusionn not strengthen because it says red-brown earthworms decreased by itself.

(B) The birds that prey on earthworms prefer black worms to red-brown worms.
Wrong.. Shell game. Birds prefer black worms ==> why birds prefer black worms, because birds can see black worms ==> if they cannot see black worms, how can they prefer them? ==> we can infer that the blackening of the woods does not play any role to help black worms.

(C) Climate conditions since 1990 have been more favorable to the survival of the red-brown worm than to the black worm.
Correct. C definitely says the number of red worms does not decrease, even red worms increased their population more than in 1980 ==> However, the number of black worms equals to that of red worms ==> the the blackening of the woods must play an important role to help black worms.

(D) The average life span of the earthworms has remained the same since the factory began operations.
Wrong.. D does not help anything to clarify why the number of black worms increased.

(E) Since the factory took steps to reduce emissions six months ago, there has been a slight increase in the earthworm population.
Wrong.. Apposite answer. Factory reduces emission ==> woods are less blacken ==> But the number of earthworm increase ==> the blackening of the woods does not play any role.

Hope it helps.


I understand why C is better but can you help me explain why D is bad?
Another POV can be that since life spans have not changed, so blackening is doing the damage. This is like other things remaining same, blackening is an issue.
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2012
Posts: 138
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 22

Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit [#permalink] New post 20 Apr 2013, 01:25
pqhai wrote:
Tough question. This is an example of the combination of CAUSES & EFFECTS and COMPARISON.

MAIN IDEA:

Before event A, X is less than Y.
After event A, X and Y are equal
Conclusion: Event A causes X increase.

Assumption: Y does not decrease itself or there's NO factors make Y decrease.

Negation to confirm: If Y decreases itself ==> cannot say Event A causes X increase (because X is the same, only Y decreases to make two variables are equal).

CONSIDER EACH ANSWER:

(A) The number of red-brown earthworms in the Millerton woods has steadily dropped since the factory began operations.
Wrong. Actually A weakens the conclusionn not strengthen because it says red-brown earthworms decreased by itself.

(B) The birds that prey on earthworms prefer black worms to red-brown worms.
Wrong.. Shell game. Birds prefer black worms ==> why birds prefer black worms, because birds can see black worms ==> if they cannot see black worms, how can they prefer them? ==> we can infer that the blackening of the woods does not play any role to help black worms.

(C) Climate conditions since 1990 have been more favorable to the survival of the red-brown worm than to the black worm.
Correct. C definitely says the number of red worms does not decrease, even red worms increased their population more than in 1980 ==> However, the number of black worms equals to that of red worms ==> the the blackening of the woods must play an important role to help black worms.

(D) The average life span of the earthworms has remained the same since the factory began operations.
Wrong.. D does not help anything to clarify why the number of black worms increased.

(E) Since the factory took steps to reduce emissions six months ago, there has been a slight increase in the earthworm population.
Wrong.. Apposite answer. Factory reduces emission ==> woods are less blacken ==> But the number of earthworm increase ==> the blackening of the woods does not play any role.

Hope it helps.


I understand why C is better but can you help me explain why D is bad?
Another POV can be that since life spans have not changed, so blackening is doing the damage. This is like other things remaining same, blackening is an issue.
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 150
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 41

Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2013, 22:14
pqhai wrote:
Tough question. This is an example of the combination of CAUSES & EFFECTS and COMPARISON.

MAIN IDEA:

Before event A, X is less than Y.
After event A, X and Y are equal
Conclusion: Event A causes X increase.

Assumption: Y does not decrease itself or there's NO factors make Y decrease.

Negation to confirm: If Y decreases itself ==> cannot say Event A causes X increase (because X is the same, only Y decreases to make two variables are equal).

CONSIDER EACH ANSWER:

(A) The number of red-brown earthworms in the Millerton woods has steadily dropped since the factory began operations.
Wrong. Actually A weakens the conclusionn not strengthen because it says red-brown earthworms decreased by itself.

(B) The birds that prey on earthworms prefer black worms to red-brown worms.
Wrong.. Shell game. Birds prefer black worms ==> why birds prefer black worms, because birds can see black worms ==> if they cannot see black worms, how can they prefer them? ==> we can infer that the blackening of the woods does not play any role to help black worms.

(C) Climate conditions since 1990 have been more favorable to the survival of the red-brown worm than to the black worm.
Correct. C definitely says the number of red worms does not decrease, even red worms increased their population more than in 1980 ==> However, the number of black worms equals to that of red worms ==> the the blackening of the woods must play an important role to help black worms.

(D) The average life span of the earthworms has remained the same since the factory began operations.
Wrong.. D only says the AVERAGE life span of earthworms unchanged. Let analyze an example.

Before: The number of Red earthworms is five times that of Black earthworms. (100 vs 20)
There are 20 Black earthworms (BW), their life span is 11 days
There are 100 Red earthworms (RW), their life span is 5 days
Average life span = [20*11 + 100*5] / 120 = 6 days

After. The number of Red earthworms equals that of Black earthworms. (20 vs 20)
There are 20 BW, their life span is 11 days
There are 20 RW, their life span is 1 day (Let say, Emission from factory affected only RW, leading to RW reduced both its number and its life span. Blackening did not affect BW at all)
Average life span = [20*11 + 20*1] /40 = 6 days

(E) Since the factory took steps to reduce emissions six months ago, there has been a slight increase in the earthworm population.
Wrong.. Apposite answer. Factory reduces emission ==> woods are less blacken ==> But the number of earthworm increase ==> the blackening of the woods does not play any role.

Hope it helps.


Very nice explanations pghai..!!!

B) The birds that prey on earthworms prefer black worms to red-brown worms.

For option B, what i thought was that if birds prey on black worms, then the population of Black worms will reduce inspite of efforts made by factories. So this does not strengthen..


IS this correct?


Thanks,
Jai
_________________

MODULUS Concept ---> inequalities-158054.html#p1257636
HEXAGON Theory ---> hexagon-theory-tips-to-solve-any-heaxgon-question-158189.html#p1258308

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1066
Location: United States
Followers: 121

Kudos [?]: 1276 [0], given: 119

Premium Member
Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2013, 22:49
jaituteja wrote:
pqhai wrote:
Tough question. This is an example of the combination of CAUSES & EFFECTS and COMPARISON.

MAIN IDEA:

Before event A, X is less than Y.
After event A, X and Y are equal
Conclusion: Event A causes X increase.

Assumption: Y does not decrease itself or there's NO factors make Y decrease.

Negation to confirm: If Y decreases itself ==> cannot say Event A causes X increase (because X is the same, only Y decreases to make two variables are equal).

CONSIDER EACH ANSWER:

(A) The number of red-brown earthworms in the Millerton woods has steadily dropped since the factory began operations.
Wrong. Actually A weakens the conclusionn not strengthen because it says red-brown earthworms decreased by itself.

(B) The birds that prey on earthworms prefer black worms to red-brown worms.
Wrong.. Shell game. Birds prefer black worms ==> why birds prefer black worms, because birds can see black worms ==> if they cannot see black worms, how can they prefer them? ==> we can infer that the blackening of the woods does not play any role to help black worms.

(C) Climate conditions since 1990 have been more favorable to the survival of the red-brown worm than to the black worm.
Correct. C definitely says the number of red worms does not decrease, even red worms increased their population more than in 1980 ==> However, the number of black worms equals to that of red worms ==> the the blackening of the woods must play an important role to help black worms.

(D) The average life span of the earthworms has remained the same since the factory began operations.
Wrong.. D only says the AVERAGE life span of earthworms unchanged. Let analyze an example.

Before: The number of Red earthworms is five times that of Black earthworms. (100 vs 20)
There are 20 Black earthworms (BW), their life span is 11 days
There are 100 Red earthworms (RW), their life span is 5 days
Average life span = [20*11 + 100*5] / 120 = 6 days

After. The number of Red earthworms equals that of Black earthworms. (20 vs 20)
There are 20 BW, their life span is 11 days
There are 20 RW, their life span is 1 day (Let say, Emission from factory affected only RW, leading to RW reduced both its number and its life span. Blackening did not affect BW at all)
Average life span = [20*11 + 20*1] /40 = 6 days

(E) Since the factory took steps to reduce emissions six months ago, there has been a slight increase in the earthworm population.
Wrong.. Apposite answer. Factory reduces emission ==> woods are less blacken ==> But the number of earthworm increase ==> the blackening of the woods does not play any role.

Hope it helps.


Very nice explanations pghai..!!!

B) The birds that prey on earthworms prefer black worms to red-brown worms.

For option B, what i thought was that if birds prey on black worms, then the population of Black worms will reduce inspite of efforts made by factories. So this does not strengthen..


IS this correct?


Thanks,
Jai



Hi Jai

Your logic is not correct.
The conclusion is: the blackening of the woods helps the black-worm population increased.

Your logic is: birds prey black-worm ==> black-worm population decreased ==> B does not strengthen. But the fact clearly says: The populations of black worm INCREASED, not decreased.

==> Let use two first parts of your logic + Fact in the stimulus: birds prey black-worm ==> black-worm population decreased, however the population of black-worm still increased ==> Clearly the blackening of the woods HELPED the population of black-worm increase. Hence, B should strengthen. But actually, B is not correct answer. That's why I said B is SHELL GAME.

You can refer back to my explanation above for B.

Hope it's clear.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Mar 2013
Posts: 24
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, Entrepreneurship
Schools: NTU '15 (S)
GPA: 3.08
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 6

Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2013, 02:34
pqhai wrote:
umeshpatil wrote:
pqhai, +2 kudos for you :lol: . Very Nice explanation for this difficult question.

Do you have any generic suggestion to deal with CAUSES & EFFECTS and COMPARISON


Dear umeshpatil:
Thank you so much. I really appreciate!!! :).

I guess you have practiced a lot for CR. However, from my own experience, there are two very popular types of cause and effect OR C&F with comparison in GMAT.

TYPE 1: Cause and Effect between A & B.
Logic of GMAC is:
If A and B both occur.
Conclusion: A causes B happen.
Assumption is: B does not cause A happen.

For example: People who have high GMAT score test always wear nearsighted glasses.
Conclusion: wearing nearsighted glasses makes people get high GMAT score.
Assumption: Having high GMAT score does not make people have eyes problem, leading to wearing nearsighted glasses.

TYPE 2: Mix of Cause & Effect AND comparison.
Logic of GMAC is:
Before Event X: A was LESS than B.
After Event X: A equals B. OR A is larger than B.
Conclusion: X must cause A increase.
Assumption is: No factors make B decrease


For example: Like the question we discuss in this thread.

You will see the two question types above present in CR over and over again. When you see two things both happen, and then conclude A causes B. Or when you see before event A, after event X ==> think about cause and effect. You can pick the correct answer in your mind, even when you haven't seen the answers.

I Hope it helps you a little bit.

Regards.





In the Type 2 , According to you the Assumption is : No other factors caused the reduction in B.

But in Answer C we are just talking about how the climate had no caused the reduction.It may be that water was scarce and the Red ones needed more moisture compared to the blanck ones , hence they died enmasse.How can C strenghten the argument then?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Mar 2013
Posts: 24
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, Entrepreneurship
Schools: NTU '15 (S)
GPA: 3.08
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 6

Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2013, 02:37
Marcab wrote:
Let us first look at answer choice C and try to understand how does it strengthens the conclusion of ecologists.
Conclusion:The result says that the population of black earthworms is now almost equal to that of the red-brown earthworm, solely stemming from the blackening of the woods.
C says that "Climate conditions since 1990 have been more favorable to the survival of the red-brown worm than to the black worm".
Since climate favours the survival of red-brown worm than to the black worm, then chances are quite high that the # of red-brown worms must be very high if compared to that of black worm. Even then, the # of black worms is equal to # of red-brown worms, then something must have been wrong and some factor has played a role. What C does is that it eliminates any other chance and brings to us that the only way # of red-brown worms is equal to # of black worms is due to the blackening of woods.

Regards.



Your reasoning is flawed.C just eliminates one cause "climatic conditions" . We still have to make the assumption (if C is right) that there are no other causes for the phenonmenon
Re: Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown   [#permalink] 24 Aug 2013, 02:37
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Admitted to two, waitlisted to one force 0 05 Jun 2014, 07:42
9 Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit srabani88 4 05 Jun 2013, 01:31
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic One equation,...two variables?? stilite 2 10 Sep 2009, 08:08
A diagram has exactly two black dots and one green dot for jallenmorris 7 15 May 2008, 14:11
One black, one red, one blue and two white pearls are oxon 9 07 Nov 2004, 14:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Two types of earthworm, one black and one red-brown, inhabit

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 29 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.