Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Jun 2015, 07:01

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 May 2014
Posts: 116
Schools: YLP '18
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 21

Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink] New post 16 Aug 2014, 23:46
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

31% (02:19) correct 69% (01:47) wrong based on 311 sessions
Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark drug legislation to combat an explosion of illegal drug use in the country’s major cities. Primarily, the legislation created new controls for preventing the entry of illegal drugs from the neighboring country of Gordenia, a major producer of marijuana. However, there has been no major decrease in illegal drug use over the past year in the country’s major cities; in fact, drug use has gone up slightly in that period.

Which of the following, if true, explains how the drug legislation could have been successful despite the recent data?

(A)Most of the drug problems in Bedenia’s major cities involve drugs other than marijuana.
(B)Most illegal drug use in Bedenia occurs outside of the country’s major cities.
(C)Illegal drug use in cities dropped sharply immediately after the legislation was implemented
(D)Importation of marijuana decreased from countries other than Gordenia.
(E)Visits to drug treatment centers in the country’s major cities decreased dramatically following the legislation.

Why is the answer not (A)?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by Gnpth on 17 Aug 2014, 01:39, edited 1 time in total.
formatted the topic
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: suffer now and live forever as a champion!!!
Joined: 01 Sep 2013
Posts: 149
Location: India
Dheeraj: Madaraboina
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 75

Premium Member
Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink] New post 17 Aug 2014, 19:26
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I think the answer should be C.
We were given information that drug legislation was implemented in Major cities. And also However, there has been no major decrease in illegal drug use over the past year in the country’s major cities;
Only option C fits here because for legislation to be successful , there has to be a decrease in illegal drugs.
"Illegal drug use in cities dropped sharply immediately after the legislation was implemented."
There is difference between Major cities and cities. By implementing this Legislation in major cities , it reduced illegal drug use in cities.
By the way, option A does not address the concern of why the government is successful . Hence wrong.
Hope this helps :)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2014
Posts: 10
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V42
GMAT 2: 760 Q49 V42
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink] New post 19 Aug 2014, 06:58
I do agree with OP, while A and C are the most legitimate choices, I don't see why I'd go with C.

I don't agree with dheeraj24's reasoning. If we're making the distinction between cities and major cities, the stem says "Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark drug legislation to combat an explosion of illegal drug use in the country’s major cities". While the legislation happened to reduce usage in cities, it still did not fulfil it's goal of reducing usage in "major cities".
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: suffer now and live forever as a champion!!!
Joined: 01 Sep 2013
Posts: 149
Location: India
Dheeraj: Madaraboina
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 31 [1] , given: 75

Premium Member
Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2014, 21:27
1
This post received
KUDOS
stoneshwar wrote:
I do agree with OP, while A and C are the most legitimate choices, I don't see why I'd go with C.

I don't agree with dheeraj24's reasoning. If we're making the distinction between cities and major cities, the stem says "Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark drug legislation to combat an explosion of illegal drug use in the country’s major cities". While the legislation happened to reduce usage in cities, it still did not fulfil it's goal of reducing usage in "major cities".



Hi Stoneshwar,

You have well followed the premises. The only reason you have to go with option C is that the question asks
"Which of the following, if true, explains how the drug legislation could have been successful despite the recent data?"
This is a type of "Implementing a Plan" type CR question.
Here the plan was to reduce the illegal drugs .For this plan to be successful, the correct argument should say that "illegal drug use reduced/dropped significantly after implementing the plan. Only Option C does that.
Hope this reasoning helps .
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 464
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 58

Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink] New post 25 Aug 2014, 07:59
I also think A is the answer.
Can anyone comment on this?
2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2014
Posts: 15
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [2] , given: 122

Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink] New post 26 Aug 2014, 19:02
2
This post received
KUDOS
IMO, C is a better choice than A in this question because of the keywords "could have been successful despite recent data" in the question stem. This would indicate that recent data does not fully reflect whether it was successful at one point. It's looking for something that shows it actually did accomplish what it was meant to do...even if it didn't last.

Answer choice A doesn't explain how the plan was ever successful. It only explains why it wasn't. Marijuana usage isn't really the problem. It's part of the larger issue at hand, which is illegal drug usage.
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2014
Posts: 67
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [2] , given: 77

Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink] New post 26 Aug 2014, 20:01
2
This post received
KUDOS
The answer Should be C.
As per the premise the legislation was brought into effect two years ago. And Option C sates that there was a dramatic decrease in illegal drug use. This information makes the plan successful.
The premise further states that over the last year there has been no decrease in illegal drug use. So it is reasonable to infer that some other factor has been responsible for rise in drug use.
_________________

______________________________
Liked the Post !!!! KUDOs Plzzzzz

Chat Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 505
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 4
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 326

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink] New post 08 Apr 2015, 01:12
Although the official answer for this question is C, I still think it must be A. A is better than C.
_________________

If my post was helpful, press Kudos. If not, then just press Kudos !!!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Posts: 204
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 49

Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink] New post 27 Apr 2015, 06:05
qwerty12321 wrote:
Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark drug legislation to combat an explosion of illegal drug use in the country’s major cities. Primarily, the legislation created new controls for preventing the entry of illegal drugs from the neighboring country of Gordenia, a major producer of marijuana. However, there has been no major decrease in illegal drug use over the past year in the country’s major cities; in fact, drug use has gone up slightly in that period.

Which of the following, if true, explains how the drug legislation could have been successful despite the recent data?

(A)Most of the drug problems in Bedenia’s major cities involve drugs other than marijuana.
(B)Most illegal drug use in Bedenia occurs outside of the country’s major cities.
(C)Illegal drug use in cities dropped sharply immediately after the legislation was implemented
(D)Importation of marijuana decreased from countries other than Gordenia.
(E)Visits to drug treatment centers in the country’s major cities decreased dramatically following the legislation.

Why is the answer not (A)?


I dont think answer should be c.The question asks us to prove "how" whereas in option C it is already stated that illegal drug use has already dropped.
How can C be correct?
mikemcgarry can u please explain?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 71
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, Strategy
GPA: 3.5
WE: Human Resources (Consumer Products)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 48

Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink] New post 27 Apr 2015, 08:54
qwerty12321 wrote:
Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark drug legislation to combat an explosion of illegal drug use in the country’s major cities. Primarily, the legislation created new controls for preventing the entry of illegal drugs from the neighboring country of Gordenia, a major producer of marijuana. However, there has been no major decrease in illegal drug use over the past year in the country’s major cities; in fact, drug use has gone up slightly in that period.

Which of the following, if true, explains how the drug legislation could have been successful despite the recent data?

(A)Most of the drug problems in Bedenia’s major cities involve drugs other than marijuana.
(B)Most illegal drug use in Bedenia occurs outside of the country’s major cities.
(C)Illegal drug use in cities dropped sharply immediately after the legislation was implemented
(D)Importation of marijuana decreased from countries other than Gordenia.
(E)Visits to drug treatment centers in the country’s major cities decreased dramatically following the legislation.

Why is the answer not (A)?



I am not able ot understand why C is the correct choice. The explanations above too dont clear it up fo rme - can anyone help please?

:oops:
_________________

Thanks,
aimtoteach


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Please give Kudos if you find this post useful.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Feb 2015
Posts: 52
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 76

Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark [#permalink] New post 28 Apr 2015, 07:28
the legislation created new controls for preventing the entry of illegal drugs from the neighboring country of Gordenia- So in order for the legislation to be successful i.e the answer has to strengthen the outcome that drug entry was decreased and doesn't need to focus on the total increase or decrease in drug rate. A doesn't provide an alternate solution to the cause of increase in the drug rate but doesnt provide anything solid to strengthen the success of the legislation
Still i feel A is a better answer than C.
_________________

Kudos if it helped you in any way

Re: Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark   [#permalink] 28 Apr 2015, 07:28
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Experts publish their posts in the topic In the country of Bedenia, officials have recently gordonf35 7 12 Dec 2014, 10:35
16 In the country of Bedenia, officials have recently thelosthippie 10 02 May 2013, 23:48
5 Two years ago, the cost of the raw material used in a eladshus 3 17 Oct 2010, 10:18
Two years ago, the cost of the raw material used in a hogann 6 10 Oct 2009, 16:33
3 Two years ago, the cost of the raw material used in a skim 9 27 Jun 2009, 09:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Two years ago, officials in Bedenia implemented landmark

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.