Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Sep 2014, 04:39

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 286
Followers: 24

Kudos [?]: 352 [1] , given: 19

GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 28 Apr 2012, 18:53
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (02:14) correct 32% (01:22) wrong based on 317 sessions
Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided to tighten controls on the release of certain toxic chemicals, including benzene, formaldehyde, and other carcinogens, by chemical plants. The stated purpose of this proposal is to reduce cancers caused by air pollution. Yet, the chemical industry, rather than the government, is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the proposal. If the past actions of certain polluters in the chemical industry are any indication of future behavior, the net result of the new proposal will be an increase, rather than a decrease, in carcinogens released into the air.

The author is arguing that ____.

A) no chemical companies can be trusted to follow the clean air proposal
b) the chemical industry is responsible for releasing the majority of carcinogens into the air
c) allowing self-monitoring for the new clean air proposal will result in the opposite of its intended consequence
d) to ensure effective implementation, the government should always monitor the execution of its proposals
e) benzene and formaldehyde are two of the most hazardous cancer-causing chemicals

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Main CR Qs link - Main link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

********************
Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post.

Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount Codes
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Trying.... & desperate for success.
Joined: 17 May 2012
Posts: 79
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Entrepreneurship
Schools: NUS '15
GMAT 1: Q33 V27
GPA: 2.92
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 61

Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2012, 09:48
GetThisDone wrote:
Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided to tighten controls on the
release of certain toxic chemicals, including benzene, formaldehyde, and other carcinogens,
by chemical plants. The stated purpose of this proposal is to reduce cancers caused by air
pollution. Yet, the chemical industry, rather than the government, is responsible for
monitoring the implementation of the proposal. If the past actions of certain polluters in the
chemical industry are any indication of future behavior, the net result of the new proposal
will be an increase, rather than a decrease, in carcinogens released into the air. The author is
arguing that ____.
A) no chemical companies can be trusted to follow the clean air proposal
b) the chemical industry is responsible for releasing the majority of carcinogens into the air
c) allowing self-monitoring for the new clean air proposal will result in the opposite of its
intended consequence
d) to ensure effective implementation, the government should always monitor the execution of
its proposals
e) benzene and formaldehyde are two of the most hazardous cancer-causing chemicals



I was tied b/w option C & D.
Option C states the event of "intent going opposite" WILL happen instead of "could" happen. It ignores the if-then condition(in stimulus) and jumps to "then" part.

So why C could be correct?

If the author goes in the similar sense then option D should also be correct.

Can anyone help by explaining this question?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 110
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 78

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2012, 03:55
navigator123 wrote:
GetThisDone wrote:
Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided to tighten controls on the
release of certain toxic chemicals, including benzene, formaldehyde, and other carcinogens,
by chemical plants. The stated purpose of this proposal is to reduce cancers caused by air
pollution. Yet, the chemical industry, rather than the government, is responsible for
monitoring the implementation of the proposal. If the past actions of certain polluters in the
chemical industry are any indication of future behavior, the net result of the new proposal
will be an increase, rather than a decrease, in carcinogens released into the air. The author is
arguing that ____.
A) no chemical companies can be trusted to follow the clean air proposal
b) the chemical industry is responsible for releasing the majority of carcinogens into the air
c) allowing self-monitoring for the new clean air proposal will result in the opposite of its
intended consequence
d) to ensure effective implementation, the government should always monitor the execution of
its proposals
e) benzene and formaldehyde are two of the most hazardous cancer-causing chemicals



I was tied b/w option C & D.
Option C states the event of "intent going opposite" WILL happen instead of "could" happen. It ignores the if-then condition(in stimulus) and jumps to "then" part.

So why C could be correct?

If the author goes in the similar sense then option D should also be correct.

Can anyone help by explaining this question?


c) allowing self-monitoring for the new clean air proposal will result in the opposite of its intended consequence --> as the argument talks about self monitoring and if implementation is given to chemical industry we will have more carcinogens released in air. This aptly answers the question.

d) to ensure effective implementation, the government should always monitor the execution of its proposals--> to extreme and uses strong words .. so it cannot be correct
Current Student
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 514
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 269

Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2012, 06:52
navigator123 wrote:
GetThisDone wrote:
Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided to tighten controls on the
release of certain toxic chemicals, including benzene, formaldehyde, and other carcinogens,
by chemical plants. The stated purpose of this proposal is to reduce cancers caused by air
pollution. Yet, the chemical industry, rather than the government, is responsible for
monitoring the implementation of the proposal. If the past actions of certain polluters in the
chemical industry are any indication of future behavior, the net result of the new proposal
will be an increase, rather than a decrease, in carcinogens released into the air. The author is
arguing that ____.
A) no chemical companies can be trusted to follow the clean air proposal
b) the chemical industry is responsible for releasing the majority of carcinogens into the air
c) allowing self-monitoring for the new clean air proposal will result in the opposite of its
intended consequence
d) to ensure effective implementation, the government should always monitor the execution of
its proposals
e) benzene and formaldehyde are two of the most hazardous cancer-causing chemicals



I was tied b/w option C & D.
Option C states the event of "intent going opposite" WILL happen instead of "could" happen. It ignores the if-then condition(in stimulus) and jumps to "then" part.

So why C could be correct?

If the author goes in the similar sense then option D should also be correct.

Can anyone help by explaining this question?


First of all, this is a CR question not an SC. :lol: (Just kidding)

You must flow with the stem while reading the options. Here the author is ARGUING, arguing what? Something which is given in the stem, what is given in the stem? not option D(to ensure effective implementation, the government should always monitor the execution of its proposals) but our answer i.e. option C (allowing self-monitoring for the new clean air proposal will result in the opposite of its intended consequence) by stating that "If the past actions of certain polluters in the
chemical industry are any indication of future behavior, the net result of the new proposal will be an increase, rather than a decrease, in carcinogens released into the air"

Hope this helps !
:-D
_________________

First Attempt 710 - first-attempt-141273.html

GMAT Instructor
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 967
Location: Toronto
Followers: 256

Kudos [?]: 681 [0], given: 3

GMAT Tests User
Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2012, 13:35
As the question stem says, the net result of the new proposal will be an increase, rather than a decrease, in carcinogens, when earlier it says that the purpose of the proposal is to reduce cancers caused by air pollution. So C is the correct answer, since the stem is arguing that the proposal will achieve the opposite of its purpose.

As for the other answer choices, the argument is about the effectiveness of the clean air proposal, so B and E are not right. Nor is the argument about what proportion of chemical companies will comply with the proposal, so A is not right. And the argument is specifically about self-monitoring among chemical plant polluters, and not about self-monitoring in general, so D is not right.
_________________

Nov 2011: After years of development, I am now making my advanced Quant books and high-level problem sets available for sale. Contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com for details.

Private GMAT Tutor based in Toronto

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Jun 2012
Posts: 26
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Social Entrepreneurship
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 4

Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2012, 20:04
I don't think the author in anywhere has said the chemical companies are untrustworthy. His concern is only about their self-monitoring. So "A", "B", "D" and "E" are out.

The correct answer is "C"
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: struggling with GMAT
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 307
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 46

Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 06 Mar 2013, 14:33
Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided to tighten controls on the release of certain toxic chemicals, including benzene, formaldehyde, and other carcinogens, by chemical plants. The stated purpose of this proposal is to reduce cancers caused by air pollution. Yet, the chemical industry, rather than the government, is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the proposal. If the past actions of certain polluters in the chemical industry are any indication of future behavior, the net result of the new proposal will be an increase, rather than a decrease, in carcinogens released into the air.

The author is arguing that ____.
(A)no chemical companies can be trusted to follow the clean air proposal
(B)the chemical industry is responsible for releasing the majority of carcinogens into the air
(C)allowing self-monitoring for the new clean air proposal will result in the opposite of its intended consequence
(D)to ensure effective implementation, the government should always monitor the execution of its proposals
(E)benzene and formaldehyde are two of the most hazardous cancer-causing chemicals
Need help
Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2404
Followers: 289

Kudos [?]: 2434 [2] , given: 693

Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 06 Mar 2013, 18:08
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Hi mun

let me say some thoughts about this question to help you.

1) this is not an assumtpion question, because based on two things (the word that at the and of the question stem ND the mood of the question) this is NOT an assumption question but rather an INFERENCE or MUST BE TRUE question.

2) I suggest you to to go to this topic and go step-by-step throughout the post to improve you Cr skills

critical-reasoning-megathread-145178.html

best-critical-reasoning-shortcuts-notes-tips-91280.html

This is because if on one hand is useful to post here you questions (we are happy to help you) on the other hand if you do not take control, if you do not have the tools to crack the questions (i. e. study a lot) you do not have a clear compass about: where you go, how attack the question, an efficient strategy to use, and so on....I hope you know what I mean :)

Now back to the question


Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided to tighten controls on the release of certain toxic chemicals, including benzene, formaldehyde, and other carcinogens, by chemical plants.

Ok here we have a fact that the governement wants to make effective



The stated purpose of this proposal is to reduce cancers caused by air pollution. Yet, the chemical industry, rather than the government, is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the proposal.

here we have the purpose of the proposal and the fact that the industry itself should control the implementation of a plan



If the past actions of certain polluters in the chemical industry are any indication of future behavior, the net result of the new proposal will be an increase, rather than a decrease, in carcinogens released into the air.

basically here is stated this: IF the industry control all the situation we will not have benefits; the opposite: we will have worst effects. So from this we can deduce that the industry is not able to do nothing by itself(in a few words)



The author is arguing that ____.

(INFERNCE)




(A)no chemical companies can be trusted to follow the clean air proposal

too extreme as answer and we are not completely sure of this



(B)the chemical industry is responsible for releasing the majority of carcinogens into the air

About this statistic we haven't enough indformation



(C)allowing self-monitoring for the new clean air proposal will result in the opposite of its intended consequence

This is what, precisely, I said in the stimulus. The industry, if it pursues the implementation of the proposal , then the same is not able to do nothing without the engagement of the gov. perfect. correct



(D)to ensure effective implementation, the government should always monitor the execution of its proposals

Is not what we care about. the goverment



(E)benzene and formaldehyde are two of the most hazardous cancer-causing chemicals

The chemicals are not our concern



C is indeed the correct answer

Hope this helps you to comprehend better the whole situation :)
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS
Quant: 1. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 2. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 3. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version
Verbal:1. Best EXTERNAL resources to tackle the GMAT Verbal Section 2. e-GMAT's ALL CR topics-Consolidated 3. New Critical Reasoning question bank by carcass 4. Meaning/Clarity SC Question Bank by Carcass_Souvik 5. e-GMAT's ALL SC topics-Consolidated-2nd Edition 6. The best reading to improve Reading Comprehension 7.Verbal question bank and Directories

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 453
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 70

Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 20 Apr 2013, 19:20
All duplicate threads on this topic have been merged.

Please check and follow the Guidelines for Posting in Verbal GMAT forum before posting anything.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Posts: 530
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Leadership
Schools: HBS '16
GMAT Date: 11-30-2013
GPA: 3.3
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 246

CAT Tests
Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 31 Oct 2013, 03:12
I was also stuck between C and D can there be a better explanation?
_________________

Like my post Send me a Kudos :) It is a Good manner.

Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided   [#permalink] 31 Oct 2013, 03:12
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided mun23 0 06 Mar 2013, 18:08
At a recent session, the French government has decided that asaf 8 13 Dec 2006, 12:12
At a recent session, the French government has decided that nakib77 13 15 Oct 2005, 04:45
At a recent session, the French government has decided that Dilshod 4 28 Jul 2005, 12:03
At a recent session, the French government has decided that dipaksingh 4 15 May 2005, 12:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.