Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 07 Jul 2015, 10:41

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
2 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 286
Followers: 32

Kudos [?]: 490 [2] , given: 19

Premium Member
Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 28 Apr 2012, 18:53
2
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

69% (02:15) correct 31% (01:31) wrong based on 492 sessions
Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided to tighten controls on the release of certain toxic chemicals, including benzene, formaldehyde, and other carcinogens, by chemical plants. The stated purpose of this proposal is to reduce cancers caused by air pollution. Yet, the chemical industry, rather than the government, is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the proposal. If the past actions of certain polluters in the chemical industry are any indication of future behavior, the net result of the new proposal will be an increase, rather than a decrease, in carcinogens released into the air.

The author is arguing that ____.

A) no chemical companies can be trusted to follow the clean air proposal
b) the chemical industry is responsible for releasing the majority of carcinogens into the air
c) allowing self-monitoring for the new clean air proposal will result in the opposite of its intended consequence
d) to ensure effective implementation, the government should always monitor the execution of its proposals
e) benzene and formaldehyde are two of the most hazardous cancer-causing chemicals

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Main CR Qs link - Main link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

********************
Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post.

Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount Codes
Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2634
Followers: 470

Kudos [?]: 3640 [2] , given: 726

Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 06 Mar 2013, 18:08
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Hi mun

let me say some thoughts about this question to help you.

1) this is not an assumtpion question, because based on two things (the word that at the and of the question stem ND the mood of the question) this is NOT an assumption question but rather an INFERENCE or MUST BE TRUE question.

2) I suggest you to to go to this topic and go step-by-step throughout the post to improve you Cr skills

critical-reasoning-megathread-145178.html

best-critical-reasoning-shortcuts-notes-tips-91280.html

This is because if on one hand is useful to post here you questions (we are happy to help you) on the other hand if you do not take control, if you do not have the tools to crack the questions (i. e. study a lot) you do not have a clear compass about: where you go, how attack the question, an efficient strategy to use, and so on....I hope you know what I mean :)

Now back to the question


Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided to tighten controls on the release of certain toxic chemicals, including benzene, formaldehyde, and other carcinogens, by chemical plants.

Ok here we have a fact that the governement wants to make effective



The stated purpose of this proposal is to reduce cancers caused by air pollution. Yet, the chemical industry, rather than the government, is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the proposal.

here we have the purpose of the proposal and the fact that the industry itself should control the implementation of a plan



If the past actions of certain polluters in the chemical industry are any indication of future behavior, the net result of the new proposal will be an increase, rather than a decrease, in carcinogens released into the air.

basically here is stated this: IF the industry control all the situation we will not have benefits; the opposite: we will have worst effects. So from this we can deduce that the industry is not able to do nothing by itself(in a few words)



The author is arguing that ____.

(INFERNCE)




(A)no chemical companies can be trusted to follow the clean air proposal

too extreme as answer and we are not completely sure of this



(B)the chemical industry is responsible for releasing the majority of carcinogens into the air

About this statistic we haven't enough indformation



(C)allowing self-monitoring for the new clean air proposal will result in the opposite of its intended consequence

This is what, precisely, I said in the stimulus. The industry, if it pursues the implementation of the proposal , then the same is not able to do nothing without the engagement of the gov. perfect. correct



(D)to ensure effective implementation, the government should always monitor the execution of its proposals

Is not what we care about. the goverment



(E)benzene and formaldehyde are two of the most hazardous cancer-causing chemicals

The chemicals are not our concern



C is indeed the correct answer

Hope this helps you to comprehend better the whole situation :)
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS
Quant: 1. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 2. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 3. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version
Verbal:1. Best EXTERNAL resources to tackle the GMAT Verbal Section 2. e-GMAT's ALL CR topics-Consolidated 3. New Critical Reasoning question bank by carcass 4. Meaning/Clarity SC Question Bank by Carcass_Souvik 5. e-GMAT's ALL SC topics-Consolidated-2nd Edition 6. The best reading to improve Reading Comprehension 7.Verbal question bank and Directories

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Trying.... & desperate for success.
Joined: 17 May 2012
Posts: 78
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Entrepreneurship
Schools: NUS '15
GMAT 1: Q33 V27
GPA: 2.92
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 61

Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2012, 09:48
GetThisDone wrote:
Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided to tighten controls on the
release of certain toxic chemicals, including benzene, formaldehyde, and other carcinogens,
by chemical plants. The stated purpose of this proposal is to reduce cancers caused by air
pollution. Yet, the chemical industry, rather than the government, is responsible for
monitoring the implementation of the proposal. If the past actions of certain polluters in the
chemical industry are any indication of future behavior, the net result of the new proposal
will be an increase, rather than a decrease, in carcinogens released into the air. The author is
arguing that ____.
A) no chemical companies can be trusted to follow the clean air proposal
b) the chemical industry is responsible for releasing the majority of carcinogens into the air
c) allowing self-monitoring for the new clean air proposal will result in the opposite of its
intended consequence
d) to ensure effective implementation, the government should always monitor the execution of
its proposals
e) benzene and formaldehyde are two of the most hazardous cancer-causing chemicals



I was tied b/w option C & D.
Option C states the event of "intent going opposite" WILL happen instead of "could" happen. It ignores the if-then condition(in stimulus) and jumps to "then" part.

So why C could be correct?

If the author goes in the similar sense then option D should also be correct.

Can anyone help by explaining this question?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 124
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 183

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2012, 03:55
navigator123 wrote:
GetThisDone wrote:
Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided to tighten controls on the
release of certain toxic chemicals, including benzene, formaldehyde, and other carcinogens,
by chemical plants. The stated purpose of this proposal is to reduce cancers caused by air
pollution. Yet, the chemical industry, rather than the government, is responsible for
monitoring the implementation of the proposal. If the past actions of certain polluters in the
chemical industry are any indication of future behavior, the net result of the new proposal
will be an increase, rather than a decrease, in carcinogens released into the air. The author is
arguing that ____.
A) no chemical companies can be trusted to follow the clean air proposal
b) the chemical industry is responsible for releasing the majority of carcinogens into the air
c) allowing self-monitoring for the new clean air proposal will result in the opposite of its
intended consequence
d) to ensure effective implementation, the government should always monitor the execution of
its proposals
e) benzene and formaldehyde are two of the most hazardous cancer-causing chemicals



I was tied b/w option C & D.
Option C states the event of "intent going opposite" WILL happen instead of "could" happen. It ignores the if-then condition(in stimulus) and jumps to "then" part.

So why C could be correct?

If the author goes in the similar sense then option D should also be correct.

Can anyone help by explaining this question?


c) allowing self-monitoring for the new clean air proposal will result in the opposite of its intended consequence --> as the argument talks about self monitoring and if implementation is given to chemical industry we will have more carcinogens released in air. This aptly answers the question.

d) to ensure effective implementation, the government should always monitor the execution of its proposals--> to extreme and uses strong words .. so it cannot be correct
Current Student
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 514
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 37

Kudos [?]: 154 [0], given: 269

Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2012, 06:52
navigator123 wrote:
GetThisDone wrote:
Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided to tighten controls on the
release of certain toxic chemicals, including benzene, formaldehyde, and other carcinogens,
by chemical plants. The stated purpose of this proposal is to reduce cancers caused by air
pollution. Yet, the chemical industry, rather than the government, is responsible for
monitoring the implementation of the proposal. If the past actions of certain polluters in the
chemical industry are any indication of future behavior, the net result of the new proposal
will be an increase, rather than a decrease, in carcinogens released into the air. The author is
arguing that ____.
A) no chemical companies can be trusted to follow the clean air proposal
b) the chemical industry is responsible for releasing the majority of carcinogens into the air
c) allowing self-monitoring for the new clean air proposal will result in the opposite of its
intended consequence
d) to ensure effective implementation, the government should always monitor the execution of
its proposals
e) benzene and formaldehyde are two of the most hazardous cancer-causing chemicals



I was tied b/w option C & D.
Option C states the event of "intent going opposite" WILL happen instead of "could" happen. It ignores the if-then condition(in stimulus) and jumps to "then" part.

So why C could be correct?

If the author goes in the similar sense then option D should also be correct.

Can anyone help by explaining this question?


First of all, this is a CR question not an SC. :lol: (Just kidding)

You must flow with the stem while reading the options. Here the author is ARGUING, arguing what? Something which is given in the stem, what is given in the stem? not option D(to ensure effective implementation, the government should always monitor the execution of its proposals) but our answer i.e. option C (allowing self-monitoring for the new clean air proposal will result in the opposite of its intended consequence) by stating that "If the past actions of certain polluters in the
chemical industry are any indication of future behavior, the net result of the new proposal will be an increase, rather than a decrease, in carcinogens released into the air"

Hope this helps !
:-D
_________________

First Attempt 710 - first-attempt-141273.html

Expert Post
GMAT Tutor
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1172
Followers: 303

Kudos [?]: 966 [0], given: 4

Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2012, 13:35
Expert's post
As the question stem says, the net result of the new proposal will be an increase, rather than a decrease, in carcinogens, when earlier it says that the purpose of the proposal is to reduce cancers caused by air pollution. So C is the correct answer, since the stem is arguing that the proposal will achieve the opposite of its purpose.

As for the other answer choices, the argument is about the effectiveness of the clean air proposal, so B and E are not right. Nor is the argument about what proportion of chemical companies will comply with the proposal, so A is not right. And the argument is specifically about self-monitoring among chemical plant polluters, and not about self-monitoring in general, so D is not right.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Jun 2012
Posts: 26
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Social Entrepreneurship
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 4

Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2012, 20:04
I don't think the author in anywhere has said the chemical companies are untrustworthy. His concern is only about their self-monitoring. So "A", "B", "D" and "E" are out.

The correct answer is "C"
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: struggling with GMAT
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Posts: 308
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 46

Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 06 Mar 2013, 14:33
Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided to tighten controls on the release of certain toxic chemicals, including benzene, formaldehyde, and other carcinogens, by chemical plants. The stated purpose of this proposal is to reduce cancers caused by air pollution. Yet, the chemical industry, rather than the government, is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the proposal. If the past actions of certain polluters in the chemical industry are any indication of future behavior, the net result of the new proposal will be an increase, rather than a decrease, in carcinogens released into the air.

The author is arguing that ____.
(A)no chemical companies can be trusted to follow the clean air proposal
(B)the chemical industry is responsible for releasing the majority of carcinogens into the air
(C)allowing self-monitoring for the new clean air proposal will result in the opposite of its intended consequence
(D)to ensure effective implementation, the government should always monitor the execution of its proposals
(E)benzene and formaldehyde are two of the most hazardous cancer-causing chemicals
Need help
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 453
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 70

Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 20 Apr 2013, 19:20
All duplicate threads on this topic have been merged.

Please check and follow the Guidelines for Posting in Verbal GMAT forum before posting anything.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Posts: 610
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Leadership
Schools: HBS '16
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41
GPA: 3.3
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 111 [0], given: 277

CAT Tests
Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 31 Oct 2013, 03:12
I was also stuck between C and D can there be a better explanation?
_________________

Like my post Send me a Kudos :) It is a Good manner.
My Debrief: how-to-score-750-and-750-i-moved-from-710-to-189016.html

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4400
Followers: 476

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 12 Jan 2015, 04:10
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 103
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 20

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided [#permalink] New post 15 Jan 2015, 15:17
Question stem states that Author ARGUES that..

C is the author's argument

If stem states that Author PROPOSES that... Then D will be the option..
Re: Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided   [#permalink] 15 Jan 2015, 15:17
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided mun23 0 06 Mar 2013, 18:08
5 The government has proposed a plan requiring young people to angel2009 16 02 Jan 2010, 22:07
The government has proposed a plan requiring young people to tenaman10 8 05 Jun 2009, 05:00
10 Experts publish their posts in the topic The Department of Homeland Security has proposed new federal anindyat 41 23 Dec 2006, 18:08
The government has proposed a plan requiring young people to antiant 8 04 Apr 2006, 17:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Under a new clean air proposal, the government has decided

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.