Under a provision of the Constitution that
was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states.
(A) was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it
(B) was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(C) was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(D) has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so
(E) has never been applied, Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so
I got the answer right, but I want to be sure the logic behind getting to the answer is right- laws,provisions and other universal truths are all present perfect and thus I opted for -has never been(E), D was ruled out as "whereby" suggests the provision not being used requires congress to require a call - is this correct?
Please let me know your feedback.
regards,
Prasanna
_________________
Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L