Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 May 2013, 15:23
Customize  |  Hide

Under a provision of the Constitution that was never

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 715
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never [#permalink] New post 20 Feb 2008, 05:14
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states.


(A) was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it

(B) was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(C) was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(D) has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

(E) has never been applied, Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

I got the answer right, but I want to be sure the logic behind getting to the answer is right- laws,provisions and other universal truths are all present perfect and thus I opted for -has never been(E), D was ruled out as "whereby" suggests the provision not being used requires congress to require a call - is this correct?

Please let me know your feedback.

regards,
Prasanna
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 31 Mar 2007
Posts: 588
Location: Canada eh
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC 1000- 882/1000 -> Clarification [#permalink] New post 20 Feb 2008, 11:45
I would go with E

A-C sound akward, and D doesn't flow right
Director
Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 793
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC 1000- 882/1000 -> Clarification [#permalink] New post 20 Feb 2008, 12:56
do it is always wrong – requires to do so – eliminate A, B and C

(A) was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it

(B) was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(C) was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally

(D) has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so [Whereby = by means of which – implies provision of constitution that was never applied, by means of which congress … - changing the meaning of the sentence – eliminate it]

(E) has never been applied, Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so

Answer: E
Director
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 715
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC 1000- 882/1000 -> Clarification [#permalink] New post 20 Feb 2008, 23:07
Thanks :)
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Re: SC 1000- 882/1000 -> Clarification   [#permalink] 20 Feb 2008, 23:07
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Under a provision of the Constitution that was never vc_pec 5 02 May 2007, 11:04
Popular new posts Under a provision of the Constitution that was never goalsnr 14 15 Jul 2008, 11:45
New posts 1 Under the provisions of the United States Constitution and sachinrelan 9 25 Sep 2010, 22:40
New posts 2 Under a provision of constitution that was never applied, shrive555 7 15 Oct 2010, 10:21
New posts 4 Q. Under a provision of the Constitution that was never RohitKalla 8 16 Aug 2011, 00:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Under a provision of the Constitution that was never

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.