United Energy recently invested in a series of large : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 09 Dec 2016, 11:29
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

United Energy recently invested in a series of large

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2011
Posts: 18
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [1] , given: 3

United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Sep 2011, 03:43
1
This post received
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

60% (02:56) correct 40% (02:09) wrong based on 515 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

United Energy recently invested in a series of large windmills which are able to produce renewable energy with minimal negative effect to the environment. The company has not drilled oil wells in the same area, even though greater revenues and profits could be generated from oil wells. Because any drilling would disrupt the native habitat of certain marine species in the area, some environmentalists assert that, by foregoing this drilling, United Energy has established that it places environmental impact over financial returns. However, United Energy may be acting in a manner consistent with its financial goals. Recent patterns of increasing annual hurricane activity have some experts questioning the long-term viability and profitability of oil wells in the area.

The two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first supports the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(B) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second supports that conclusion.
(C) The first supports the environmentalists’ conclusion; the second states that conclusion.
(D) The first states the environmentalists’ conclusion; the second provides a consideration in support of that conclusion.
(E) The first supports the conclusion of the argument; the second also supports the conclusion of the argument.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OE
solution:
The argument concludes that United Energy may be acting in a manner consistent with reaching its financial goals. However, this conclusion must be distinguished from the assertion of the environmentalists described in the question - that the actions taken by United Energy indicate that the company is putting environmental concerns ahead of financial returns. The answer choices may consider either the author's conclusion (which is considered the overall conclusion) or the conclusion asserted by the environmentalists (which is considered the opposing opinion).

This is an Analyze the Argument Structure question. The best approach is to consider each boldface in turn.

(A) The first boldface does not support the author's conclusion that United Energy may be acting in a manner consistent with its financial goals; the second does not call the conclusion into question as much as state its opposite.

(B) The first boldface does not state the conclusion of the argument; the second boldface does not support the conclusion of the main argument, which is that United Energy may be acting in a manner consistent with its financial goals.

(C) CORRECT. The first boldface supports the environmentalists’ conclusion that United Energy is acting in a manner that places environmental impact ahead of financial returns. The second boldface states this conclusion.

(D) The first boldface is a relationship that does support the environmentalists' conclusion; however, the second states this conclusion, and does not undermine it.

(E) The first boldface does not support the author's conclusion, which is that United Energy may be acting in its financial interest; the second boldface also does not support this conclusion.
[Reveal] Spoiler: Doubt
I am confused can anyone how to solve bold face cr questions
Please suggest me a correct strategy ... any link from where I can read more
can bold face questions have 2 conclusions:
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Posts: 417
WE 1: Business Development
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 161

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: How to solve bold face CR questions ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Sep 2011, 08:52
yuvrajpratap,

How can we help you if you do not bold the sentences?
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Head Turner ! am I ?
Affiliations: RHCE , CCNA, MCSE and Now GMAT ;)
Joined: 29 Jul 2011
Posts: 138
Location: India
WE: Operations (Computer Hardware)
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 184 [1] , given: 28

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: How to solve bold face CR questions ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Sep 2011, 09:06
1
This post received
KUDOS
Hey Yuvraj,

try e-gmat.com free CR preview. It has a section on Bold Face and 10 practice problems. See if it helps.
_________________

_______________________________________________
Am i worth a Kudo ? Life's around GMAT for the Moment

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 Mar 2011
Posts: 90
Location: United States
Schools: Erasmus (S)
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V37
GPA: 3.9
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 135 [2] , given: 12

Re: CR- United Energy foregoing drilling [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2011, 07:33
2
This post received
KUDOS
Obviously, there are two sides of opinion in this question. One side (enviromntalist's) is that enviromental issues are more important for the company than financial one. This is the conclusion which enviromentalists make from the fact that the company does not drill oil wells (and this is exactly the second boldfaced statement). And this conclusion is based on the premises that the company could extract high profits from the project, which is provided in the first boldfaced statement. Another side (expert's) is that the company does not drill not because of environment issues but because of real financial issues which is connected with forecasts about negative profitability of such projects in the long-term. And this conclusion is really the conclusion of the argument.

So, the right answer is (C)

Perhaps you could use the strategy of "elimination" which is provided in Manhattan GMAT Prep. We find that the first boldface stuff is premises and the second stuff is concusion.
(B) and (D) tells that the first statement is a conclusion, so we eliminate them.
(A) and (E) tell that the second boldface stuff is the "premise" which supports the conclusion or calls it into question, so they are also wrong.
So, the only right answer is (C)

Finally, I could say that there are rather a lot of questions with two opposite side of view in "Determine the role of Boldface" type of questions. Frequently this sides fugurate as conclusions. So you should drill solving these questions.
_________________

If my post is useful for you not be ashamed to KUDO me!
Let kudo each other!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2011
Posts: 151
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 42

Re: CR- United Energy foregoing drilling [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Oct 2011, 09:46
C
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Aug 2011
Posts: 203
GPA: 3.5
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 51

Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jan 2012, 20:56
C it is.
1 KUDOS received
BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 573
GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
Followers: 105

Kudos [?]: 825 [1] , given: 309

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Nov 2013, 00:24
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10444
Followers: 886

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jan 2015, 00:16
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2091
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Stanford '19
GMAT 1: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V26
GMAT 3: 560 Q43 V24
GMAT 4: 650 Q49 V30
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 248 [0], given: 124

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2015, 14:16
yuvrajpratap wrote:
United Energy recently invested in a series of large windmills which are able to produce renewable energy with minimal negative effect to the environment. The company has not drilled oil wells in the same area, even though greater revenues and profits could be generated from oil wells. Because any drilling would disrupt the native habitat of certain marine species in the area, some environmentalists assert that, by foregoing this drilling, United Energy has established that it places environmental impact over financial returns. However, United Energy may be acting in a manner consistent with its financial goals. Recent patterns of increasing annual hurricane activity have some experts questioning the long-term viability and profitability of oil wells in the area.


C for me too.

the conclusion is: UE may be acting in a manner consistent with its financial goals.
the conclusion of the environmentalist is: UE places environmental impact over financial returns.

first one is a fact, and can be used as a premise for the conclusion of the environmentalist.

(A) The first supports the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
no, the first one does not support the conclusion of the argument. furthermore, the second does not call the conclusion into question; it is an intermediate conclusion.

(B) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second supports that conclusion.
no, the first one is a fact, it is not a conclusion. the second one is an intermediate conclusion, and it does not support the main conclusion.

(C) The first supports the environmentalists’ conclusion; the second states that conclusion.
looks good.

(D) The first states the environmentalists’ conclusion; the second provides a consideration in support of that conclusion.
the functions should be vice versa. let's see why:
UE envir>$, therefore greater revenues could be generated from oil wells. doesn't make sense.
now, let's try the correct way: greater revenues could be generated from oil wells. since UE uses windmills, UE established that it places EI over fin. returns. - now this looks better.

(E) The first supports the conclusion of the argument; the second also supports the conclusion of the argument.
no, the first is a general fact, and it does not support the conclusion. the second as well does not support the conclusion.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2014
Posts: 55
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Feb 2016, 03:39
The first is a fact (evidence) that supports the second claim (conclusion).
Choice C is correct.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Posts: 49
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 15

CAT Tests
Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2016, 15:20
Hi Yuvraj/ Whoever is preparing for GMAT now,

As mentioned in one of the posts earlier, I am big big fan of the @egmat's strategy for bold face questions. Even though you may not get more than 2 bold face questions on the test but just having one more CR type question under you control adds a lot to the confidence. I had a similar problem with bold face questions but i THINK i am much much better now.

To summarise, the strategy asks you to do two things:

1. Tag each statement ( including bold faces) of the argument as the possible options: conclusion / belief / evidence/ explanation/ pattern etc.
2. CLEARLY understand the meaning of each of these options.

I generally dont use the notepad to solve CR questions but I ensure that write down the what i mentioned above while solving BF questions before I proceed to the options. This will help you a LOT in not getting confused.

I hope this helps. Let me know if you need any other information, I will be more than happy to help :) All the best ! :)

Regards,
Shradha
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Posts: 49
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 15

CAT Tests
Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2016, 15:23
Hi Yuvraj/ Whoever is preparing for GMAT now,

As mentioned in one of the posts earlier, I am big big fan of the @egmat's strategy for bold face questions. Even though you may not get more than 2 bold face questions on the test but just having one more CR type question under your control adds a lot to the confidence. I had a similar problem with bold face questions but i THINK i am much much better now.
To summarise, the strategy asks you to do two things:

1. Tag each statement ( including bold faces) of the argument as one of the following possible options: conclusion / belief / evidence/ explanation/ pattern etc.
2. CLEARLY understand the meaning of each of these options.

I generally dont use the notepad to solve CR questions but I ensure that write down the what i mentioned above while solving BF questions before I proceed to the options. This will help you a LOT in not getting confused.

I hope this helps. Let me know if you need any other information, I will be more than happy to help :) All the best ! :)

Regards,
Shradha
Re: United Energy recently invested in a series of large   [#permalink] 26 Jul 2016, 15:23
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 A company that invests the necessary infrastructure in a large Harley1980 2 08 Aug 2015, 01:52
11 Experts publish their posts in the topic CR Strengthen Series 1) Several Energy Alternative Programs EMPOWERgmatMax 6 24 May 2015, 20:13
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Boldface Revision: United Energy recently invested in a series souvik101990 3 20 Mar 2015, 23:06
15 United Energy recently invested in a series of large carcass 9 07 May 2013, 12:43
6 A recent series of newspaper articles revealed that shrive555 3 16 Dec 2010, 10:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

United Energy recently invested in a series of large

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.