Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Apr 2014, 05:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Unlike the more traditional energy sources of coal, gas, and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Unlike the more traditional energy sources of coal, gas, and [#permalink] New post 16 Jun 2004, 05:56
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Unlike the more traditional energy sources of coal, gas, and nuclear energy, energy from the sun produces no major problems. It produces no pollution and requires no transportation from foreign lands. It threatens no one with radiation dangers and is not controlled by powerful corporations. Therefore, we should encourage people to use solar energy.

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens this argument?
A) there have been very few studies of solar energy use by households
B) the cost of oil and gas could be regulated to make it less costly for home consumption
C) the cost of the equipment required to collect enough solar energy for a family of four equals the amount a family now pays for oil, gas, or nuclear produced energy in one year
D) most critics of solar energy are connected to energy monopolies
E) an effective way for families to capture and store solar energy has not yet been developed
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1818
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Jun 2004, 06:08
E is my FA.

The passage talks about usage of Solar power for people and the statement points out the weekness that even with so many advantages the energy cannot be stored effectively.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1799
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Jun 2004, 06:37
My vote is for (E) as well.

If they cannot capture and store the solar energy then what are they going to do at night. ?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 295
Location: US
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Jun 2004, 07:16
E here too.

These days I try to break the argument down instead of just answering it.

Summary of argument:
Conclusion: people should use solar energy
Intermediate conclusion: energy from the sun = no problems
Reason 1: Solar energy = no pollution and no transportation
Reason 2: Solar energy = no radiation and no control by powerful corps

Answer choices:
A = so what?
B = out of scope
C = maybe
D = so what?
E = maybe

Between C and E, E is a better choice. In C, even though the cost of collecting solar energy may be high, it still does not weaken the argument because the other benefits may outweigh this cost.

E weakens the assumption that peopel are able to effectively use solar energy.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Dec 2003
Posts: 360
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Jun 2004, 09:06
Hi

I stand with C. C is the best choice.

Why, explaination below...let us look at the 2 contenders C and E

Unlike the more traditional energy sources of coal, gas, and nuclear energy, energy from the sun produces no major problems. It produces no pollution and requires no transportation from foreign lands. It threatens no one with radiation dangers and is not controlled by powerful corporations. Therefore, we should encourage people to use solar energy.

C) the cost of the equipment required to collect enough solar energy for a family of four equals the amount a family now pays for oil, gas, or nuclear produced energy in one year

E) an effective way for families to capture and store solar energy has not yet been developed

For me, it seems simple, that the author compares energy from Coal, Gas and Nuclear energy to that from Solar. All these are obtained in a similar grounds. Meaning, one cannot produce energy from nuclear at home. Comparing Energy genereted thru coal etc.. with solar thru these plants.

If the cost of the production is so high that it does not seem economical for the family to opt for solar. What is the point if I have to pay a huge price, because it is non-pollutant. Is that the question that pops-out if the same is subjected to all of us.

Hence, choice C weakens the author's proposal the most.

Regards
_________________

Giving another SHOT

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 184
Location: Kiev, Ukraine
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Jun 2004, 09:21
I vote for E.

C. Let's say technology for capturing and storing solar power is available and it costs as much as a family pays for the alternative source of power (coal, gas, etc.) for one year.

The household will have to buy the equipment only once, and use it for more than a few years (probably get it on credit, too). The solar power equipment will pay for itself in one year and the benefits of solar power described in the passage (no pollution, no need for transportation, etc.) would count in as well. The family would make a financially adverse decision if it continued to use the regular sources of power.

E. If technology isn't available, it's pretty absurd to encourage ppl to use solar power!!! Like Anand said, what would they do at night?
_________________

Searching for an answer...

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 282
Location: Ukraine
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Jun 2004, 11:33
E...
Paul, give us tougher questions! :)
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Jun 2004, 21:06
OA is E. You guys are too good!
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

  [#permalink] 16 Jun 2004, 21:06
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts The energy source on Voyager2 is not a nuclear reactor, in rrr 2 07 Jun 2004, 08:00
Popular new posts 2 Experts publish their posts in the topic The energy source on Voyager2 is not a nuclear reactor, in bmwhype2 16 18 Jun 2007, 07:39
Popular new posts The coal strike reduced Indiana's energy reserves, which Beyond700 15 19 Nov 2007, 03:01
Popular new posts 1 Experts publish their posts in the topic The energy source on Voyager 2 is not a nuclear reactor, in devinawilliam83 11 19 Jan 2012, 21:43
Popular new posts 4 Experts publish their posts in the topic Unlike traditional retailers that deploy one new product thelosthippie 13 20 Apr 2013, 04:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Unlike the more traditional energy sources of coal, gas, and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.