Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 May 2016, 09:56
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3053
Followers: 1023

Kudos [?]: 4423 [0], given: 48

Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Oct 2013, 14:07
Expert's post
imhimanshu wrote:
Thanks Mike for the detailed explanation.
I would have answered this question had the question been Explain the paradox; The paradox being that despite controlled atmosphere, students found the difference in growth rates. And the answer Choice D would be apparent.
But, for Evaluate the argument, I usually apply "Variance Analysis" i.e testing the extremes and then analyzing the behavior of the argument.

Quote:
d. Heavy vehicular traffic such as is found in cities constantly deposits grime on greenhouse windows, reducing the amount of light that reaches the plants inside

Applying variance analysis:

Lets say that Yes. heavy vehicular traffic deposited grime on greenhouses windows, and reduced the light. -> It could be a possible factor in the difference of the growth rates of the plants.

However, if you say that there is no such grime deposited on greenhouse gases, and possibly the amount of light is same in greenhouses, then it is not describing the behavior of the growth rates.
Here, I am getting confused, if it is not the cause of difference in growth rates, then what could possibly be the factor behind the growth rates.

Another doubt is that I have seen evaluate questions comes in two varieties -
First is in which the answer choices starts with "Whether, Would , Were" etc that converts it into a form of question. In such questions, I can easily apply variance analysis.

However, second categories have plain answer choices such as the answer choices in this question.. then is it correct to apply Variance analysis here, or what should be the appropriate strategy.

Please comment.

Thanks

Dear Himanshu,
I'm happy to respond. :-)

To be perfectly honest, forget "variance analysis". Forget any pre-fab, one-size-fits-all rule. The GMAT excels at creating diverse questions ---- each new questions depends on a logical twist unique to that particular situation and unlike anything in any other question. if you try to apply fixed rules to the GMAT CR, it will fool you time and time again. You must forget all general methods, and dive into a critical analysis of what is unique and particular about the individual situation at hand.

In Evaluate the Argument questions, a correct answer need only have impact on the argument if the question is answered one way. Suppose there's a GMAT CR argument, and it's a "evaluate the argument" prompt. Suppose the OA is: "Whether P causes Q?" Now, suppose that, if P does cause Q, that would significantly change the argument, but if P does not cause Q, that would have zero effect on the argument. That's perfectly fine. That's the norm for Evaluate the Argument CR questions. The OA may pose a question that has crucial implications for the prompt argument either way, but that's not necessary ---- as long as one way of answering that question has crucial implications for the argument, then it doesn't matter whether the other answer would not affect the argument at all.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7638
Followers: 709

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2014, 01:59
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 May 2015
Posts: 28
Location: United States
Concentration: Operations, Other
GPA: 3.39
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 315

Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2015, 06:36
If you assume that heavy vehicle emit sulfur dioxide and cause grime, only then D will be correct :D
idk whether you can assume upto that
Expert Post
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 3053
Followers: 1023

Kudos [?]: 4423 [0], given: 48

Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2015, 10:02
Expert's post
oishik wrote:
If you assume that heavy vehicle emit sulfur dioxide and cause grime, only then D will be correct :D
idk whether you can assume upto that

Dear oishik,
I'm happy to respond. :-) Think about the structure of the question. The prompt question says:

Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?

In other words, the test is telling us to assume that each one of the answer choices is true. For each answer choice, our job is to assume that the information in the answer is 100%, and then see if this new information sheds light on the argument.

When you are considering answer choice (D), not only are you allowed to assume that it is true, but you are supposed to assume that! The question explicitly tells us that it is your job to assume that (D) is completely true, for however long you are considering that particular choice as a possible answer. You don't even get a choice about this: you have to assume that (D) is true to understand this answer choice.

Does this distinction make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air,   [#permalink] 08 Oct 2015, 10:02

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 24 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Rural households have more purchasing power than do urban or suburban Priyank38939 0 15 Jul 2015, 00:01
Air travel is becoming increasingly more ashiima 6 29 Nov 2011, 20:08
11 Air travel is becoming increasingly more dangerous. In the jaxtor 29 17 Jun 2009, 07:13
7 Experts publish their posts in the topic CR: air pollutants lexis 27 26 Jun 2008, 02:56
1 Air travel is becoming increasingly more dangerous. In the srp 5 03 Feb 2008, 01:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.