Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 23 May 2016, 23:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air,

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 210
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 42 [2] , given: 1

Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 May 2008, 07:13
2
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

71% (02:20) correct 29% (01:32) wrong based on 618 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, and plants in cities typically grow more slowly than do plants in rural areas. In an experiment to see how much of the difference in growth is due to sulfur dioxide, classes in an urban and a rural school grew plants in greenhouse at their schools and filtered the greenhouse air to eliminate sulfur dioxide. Plants in the urban greenhouse grew more slowly than those in the rural greenhouse.

Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?

A. The urban school was located in a part of the city in which levels of sulfur dioxide in the air were usually far lower than is typical for urban areas
B. At both schools, the plants in the greenhouses grew much more quickly than did plants planted outdoors in plots near the greenhouse
C. The urban class conducting the experiment was larger than the rural class conducting the experiment
D. Heavy vehicular traffic such as is found in cities constantly deposits grime on greenhouse windows, reducing the amount of light that reaches the plants inside
E. Because of the higher levels of sulfur dioxide in the air at the urban school, the air filters for the urban school’s greenhouse were changed more frequently than were those at the rural school

Pls add in details of how u tackle the qsn. Thks
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by mikemcgarry on 08 Oct 2015, 09:55, edited 2 times in total.
OA not provided
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 6563
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1786

Kudos [?]: 10735 [4] , given: 210

Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2013, 00:57
4
KUDOS
Expert's post
AlbertNTN wrote:
Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, and plants in cities typically grow more slowly than do plants in rural areas. In an experiment to see how much of the difference in growth is due to sulfur dioxide, classes in an urban and a rural school grew plants in greenhouse at their schools and filtered the greenhouse air to eliminate sulfur dioxide. Plants in the urban greenhouse grew more slowly than those in the rural greenhouse.
Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?
a. The urban school was located in a part of the city in which levels of sulfur dioxide in the air were usually far lower than is typical for urban areas
b. At both schools, the plants in the greenhouses grew much more quickly than did plants planted outdoors in plots near the greenhouse
c. The urban class conducting the experiment was larger than the rural class conducting the experiment
d. Heavy vehicular traffic such as is found in cities constantly deposits grime on greenhouse windows, reducing the amount of light that reaches the plants inside
e. Because of the higher levels of sulfur dioxide in the air at the urban school, the air filters for the urban school’s greenhouse were changed more frequently than were those at the rural school

Pls add in details of how u tackle the qsn. Thks

Responding to a pm:

LEt's understand the argument first:

There are two facts given:
1. Urban air has more sulphur dioxide.
2. Urban plants grow slower.

We want to find the effect of high sulphur dioxide in the air on the slow growth. Say, urban plants grow at the rate of 2 cm per month. Rural grow at 8 cm per month.
If we remove sulphur dioxide from air, we might see that urban plants grow at 6 cm per month while rural grow at 10 cm per month. This will show us the effect of higher sulphur dioxide. But these numbers will be dependable when everything else is kept the same. Only then we can separate out the contribution of higher levels of sulphur dioxide. If the urban greenhouse is different from the rural greenhouse, the difference could account for a part of the difference in growth rate too. Option (D) tells us that urban greenhouse gets lesser light. This means we cannot measure the contribution of higher sulphur dioxide to slower growth rate. Hence we need option (D) to evaluate the result.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Director Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 541 Schools: Stern, McCombs, Marshall, Wharton Followers: 7 Kudos [?]: 134 [2] , given: 0 Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink] ### Show Tags 14 May 2008, 07:47 2 This post received KUDOS AlbertNTN wrote: OA is D, thks for the explanation I chose B because i think that proves sulfur dioxide affects growing speed of the plants (remove the air makes it grow faster, then in rural when it is less, plants grow faster also). Still don't know how to eliminate this... or might be i infer too much ... b. At both schools, the plants in the greenhouses grew much more quickly than did plants planted outdoors in plots near the greenhouse Answer B is only looking at the results. "Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?" If you have an experiment and I ask you what should be the most important thing you should consider to evaluate the results you shouldn't say the results themselves. You should be focused on the criteria of the experiment to make sure it's fair. Magoosh GMAT Instructor Joined: 28 Dec 2011 Posts: 3044 Followers: 1021 Kudos [?]: 4416 [2] , given: 48 Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink] ### Show Tags 04 Oct 2013, 13:33 2 This post received KUDOS Expert's post imhimanshu wrote: Hello Experts, I am having a hard time understanding this argument. The argument says that they want to check the effect of SO2 on the growth of plants grown respectively in urban and in rural areas. Now, the students are doing an experiment in green houses and they have filtered the S02. Now, isn't it the case that the plants should grow at equal rates because the only thing that hampering their growth was SO2. However, they have found that the difference in growth is still there. How come this be possible. In nutshell, isn't the experiment itself is erroneous. that is, if you want to see the impact of sulphur dioxide on the growth rates of plants, and you are removing the SO2 from the atmosphere, then how can you judge the impact. Please help. Thanks, imhimanshu Dear Himanshu, I'm happy to help. I don't know how much you have studied experimental design or have been involved in the design of scientific experiments. Demonstrating correlation is a very very easy thing to do --- one experiment, or one observational study, is enough. Demonstrating causality, by contrast, is a monstrously difficult task --- sometimes it takes years, or even decades. For example, in establishing the link between cigarette smoking and cancer, the correlation was well measured from the late 1950's onward, but conclusive evidence of causality was available only in the 1990's, only after molecular biology had made substantial advances. Suffice it to say: one never can conclude causality from only one experiment. In studying the effect of SO2 on plants, a causality question, there are several questions to answer, and this experiment is a very well designed experiment to test one set of those questions. True, it's not the only experiment we could conduct, and if we really were interested in rigorously demonstrating causality, we would have to do a wide variety of experiments, some of which involved absolutely bombarding plants with SO2. This experiment, eliminating SO2 from the controlled environment, is one valid experiment, just not the only possible one. If SO2 and only SO2 were the difference, then we would expect the plants with no SO2 to grow at exactly the same rates in both places. NEVER be so literalist as to think that an experiment testing for one factor won't unexpectedly be influenced by another factor. That happens all the time in experimental design --- you try to control for everything, and sometimes that works, but sometimes a factor you never even considered turns out to make the crucial difference. Some great discoveries in the history of science have happened precisely in this way. In this experiment, we eliminate the SO2, and the plant growth is still different, which lets us know --- in addition to the SO2 levels, there's also something else that affects the growth of these plants. Then, the important question becomes --- what is that "something else", and (D) provides a possible answer to that question. Does all this make sense? Mike _________________ Mike McGarry Magoosh Test Prep Director Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 541 Schools: Stern, McCombs, Marshall, Wharton Followers: 7 Kudos [?]: 134 [1] , given: 0 Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink] ### Show Tags 13 May 2008, 07:38 1 This post received KUDOS 1 This post was BOOKMARKED I would say D. The experiment is set up to compare urban and rual areas. Greenhouses are set up in both rual and ubran areas to remove the sulfur dioxide to see what portion of the differnce in growth is actually due to presence of sulfur dioxide. For this experiment to work all other element should be the same. The greenhouses in the urban areas have grime on the windows reducing the amount of sunlight the plants get. This is the most important thing to know because it tells us that the experiment is not equal and we cannot attribute the results just to the removal of the sulfur dioxide. Then urban greenhouse plants may grow slower than the rual greenhouse plants becaue they naturally grow slower or they may grow slower because they are getting less sunlight. Either way the addition of D tells us the results of the experiment are not valid. Manager Joined: 02 Mar 2008 Posts: 210 Concentration: Finance, Strategy Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 42 [1] , given: 1 Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink] ### Show Tags 14 May 2008, 06:35 1 This post received KUDOS OA is D, thks for the explanation I chose B because i think that proves sulfur dioxide affects growing speed of the plants (remove the air makes it grow faster, then in rural when it is less, plants grow faster also). Still don't know how to eliminate this... or might be i infer too much ... b. At both schools, the plants in the greenhouses grew much more quickly than did plants planted outdoors in plots near the greenhouse Manager Joined: 22 Dec 2007 Posts: 158 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0 Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink] ### Show Tags 13 May 2008, 17:27 I would go with D as well. It tries to indicate that sunlight plays a role in the experiment and distorts the results. Director Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Posts: 554 Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 237 [0], given: 2 Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink] ### Show Tags 14 May 2008, 07:40 A little late.Good one. Agree with D. Manager Joined: 02 Mar 2008 Posts: 210 Concentration: Finance, Strategy Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 1 Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink] ### Show Tags 15 May 2008, 07:43 thanks... Manager Joined: 28 Apr 2008 Posts: 133 Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0 Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink] ### Show Tags 15 May 2008, 08:28 UAir (SO2) > RAir Cities (plant growth) < Rural Exp: U & R school grew plants in green houses and filtered SO2. Results : Urban Plant growth < Rural plant growth. The filtering process has any issues ? Or any other outside factors taking effect ? Are we comparing apples to apples (same plants ? , same climatic conditions etc) ? AlbertNTN wrote: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, and plants in cities typically grow more slowly than do plants in rural areas. In an experiment to see how much of the difference in growth is due to sulfur dioxide, classes in an urban and a rural school grew plants in greenhouse at their schools and filtered the greenhouse air to eliminate sulfur dioxide. Plants in the urban greenhouse grew more slowly than those in the rural greenhouse. Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result? a. The urban school was located in a part of the city in which levels of sulfur dioxide in the air were usually far lower than is typical for urban areas >> Irrelevant, since we are dealing with env. in greenhouses. b. At both schools, the plants in the greenhouses grew much more quickly than did plants planted outdoors in plots near the greenhouse >> Irrelevant. c. The urban class conducting the experiment was larger than the rural class conducting the experiment >> Irrelevant. d. Heavy vehicular traffic such as is found in cities constantly deposits grime on greenhouse windows, reducing the amount of light that reaches the plants inside >> This will certainly help us evaluate the argument. e. Because of the higher levels of sulfur dioxide in the air at the urban school, the air filters for the urban school’s greenhouse were changed more frequently than were those at the rural school >> This does not validate the experiment results in any way. Pls add in details of how u tackle the qsn. Thks Senior Manager Status: Now or never Joined: 07 Aug 2010 Posts: 328 Location: India Concentration: Strategy, Technology GPA: 3.5 WE: Consulting (Consulting) Followers: 7 Kudos [?]: 210 [0], given: 27 Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink] ### Show Tags 08 Aug 2011, 12:30 IMO it should be E and not D , if excluding the SO2 from the experiment , Urban plants still growing slowly than rural ones then it is sure that SO2 is not playing a role here and there are some other factors , however the fact is that the guy cnducting the experiment already knows this(he has observed this) and he/she wants to be absolutely sure that there are no other factors contributing to this so he would evaluate things which strenghten his belief that So2 has been eliminated properly. _________________ Please press KUDOS if you like my post Director Status: Prep started for the n-th time Joined: 29 Aug 2010 Posts: 707 Followers: 5 Kudos [?]: 137 [0], given: 37 Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink] ### Show Tags 08 Aug 2011, 21:36 +1 for D. Good question. Crick Senior Manager Joined: 16 Feb 2011 Posts: 262 Followers: 4 Kudos [?]: 106 [0], given: 9 Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink] ### Show Tags 09 Aug 2011, 03:34 D it is.. Intern Joined: 07 Oct 2011 Posts: 30 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 1 Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink] ### Show Tags 13 Aug 2012, 21:44 Can't a variance test be used here? yes/no test? Director Status: Final Countdown Joined: 17 Mar 2010 Posts: 563 Location: India GPA: 3.82 WE: Account Management (Retail Banking) Followers: 16 Kudos [?]: 229 [0], given: 75 Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink] ### Show Tags 13 Aug 2012, 21:54 Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, and plants in cities typically grow more slowly than do plants in rural areas. In an experiment to see how much of the difference in growth is due to sulfur dioxide, classes in an urban and a rural school grew plants in greenhouse at their schools and filtered the greenhouse air to eliminate sulfur dioxide. Plants in the urban greenhouse grew more slowly than those in the rural greenhouse. Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result? We need to find another reason for the slow growth of plants, other than the presence of sulfur dioxide in air. a. The urban school was located in a part of the city in which levels of sulfur dioxide in the air were usually far lower than is typical for urban areas b. At both schools, the plants in the greenhouses grew much more quickly than did plants planted outdoors in plots near the greenhouse c. The urban class conducting the experiment was larger than the rural class conducting the experiment d. Heavy vehicular traffic such as is found in cities constantly deposits grime on greenhouse windows, reducing the amount of light that reaches the plants inside "deficiency of sunlight" is responsible for the slow growth of plants. e. Because of the higher levels of sulfur dioxide in the air at the urban school, the air filters for the urban school’s greenhouse were changed more frequently than were those at the rural school _________________ " Make more efforts " Press Kudos if you liked my post Manager Joined: 02 Apr 2013 Posts: 64 Concentration: General Management, Technology GMAT 1: Q V GPA: 3 WE: Science (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech) Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 26 Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink] ### Show Tags 19 Aug 2013, 23:36 AlbertNTN wrote: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, and plants in cities typically grow more slowly than do plants in rural areas. In an experiment to see how much of the difference in growth is due to sulfur dioxide, classes in an urban and a rural school grew plants in greenhouse at their schools and filtered the greenhouse air to eliminate sulfur dioxide. Plants in the urban greenhouse grew more slowly than those in the rural greenhouse. Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result? a. The urban school was located in a part of the city in which levels of sulfur dioxide in the air were usually far lower than is typical for urban areas b. At both schools, the plants in the greenhouses grew much more quickly than did plants planted outdoors in plots near the greenhouse c. The urban class conducting the experiment was larger than the rural class conducting the experiment d. Heavy vehicular traffic such as is found in cities constantly deposits grime on greenhouse windows, reducing the amount of light that reaches the plants inside e. Because of the higher levels of sulfur dioxide in the air at the urban school, the air filters for the urban school’s greenhouse were changed more frequently than were those at the rural school Pls add in details of how u tackle the qsn. Thks I was split between B and D on this one. B is suggesting that something in addition to SO2 was affecting plant growth in urban areas but nonetheless SO2 is indeed a factor. I think this ties together the effect the question is trying to determine. D is directly saying that because urban greenhouses received less light, they grew less which implies that the plants in urban areas would have grew like the ones in rural areas had it not been for grime. I feel as if B is implying other variables while D is directly stating it...perhaps thats why D is a better choice. Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 6563 Location: Pune, India Followers: 1786 Kudos [?]: 10735 [0], given: 210 Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink] ### Show Tags 20 Aug 2013, 21:14 Expert's post animanga008 wrote: AlbertNTN wrote: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, and plants in cities typically grow more slowly than do plants in rural areas. In an experiment to see how much of the difference in growth is due to sulfur dioxide, classes in an urban and a rural school grew plants in greenhouse at their schools and filtered the greenhouse air to eliminate sulfur dioxide. Plants in the urban greenhouse grew more slowly than those in the rural greenhouse. Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result? a. The urban school was located in a part of the city in which levels of sulfur dioxide in the air were usually far lower than is typical for urban areas b. At both schools, the plants in the greenhouses grew much more quickly than did plants planted outdoors in plots near the greenhouse c. The urban class conducting the experiment was larger than the rural class conducting the experiment d. Heavy vehicular traffic such as is found in cities constantly deposits grime on greenhouse windows, reducing the amount of light that reaches the plants inside e. Because of the higher levels of sulfur dioxide in the air at the urban school, the air filters for the urban school’s greenhouse were changed more frequently than were those at the rural school Pls add in details of how u tackle the qsn. Thks I was split between B and D on this one. B is suggesting that something in addition to SO2 was affecting plant growth in urban areas but nonetheless SO2 is indeed a factor. I think this ties together the effect the question is trying to determine. D is directly saying that because urban greenhouses received less light, they grew less which implies that the plants in urban areas would have grew like the ones in rural areas had it not been for grime. I feel as if B is implying other variables while D is directly stating it...perhaps thats why D is a better choice. I am not sure how you figured that B is suggesting "that something in addition to SO2 was affecting plant growth in urban areas ". Actually B is suggesting that sulphur dioxide does slow down plant growth substantially. When plants were grown in a greenhouse where the air was filtered to remove sulphur dioxide, their growth rate increased in both urban and rural areas. In fact, in (B), they have mentioned "than did plants planted outdoors in plots near the greenhouse" specifically to tell us that the conditions were very similar other than the fact that greenhouse air had no sulphur dioxide. This is the result of the experiment. It isn't something necessary to evaluate the result. _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Joined: 04 Jun 2012
Posts: 45
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GPA: 3.1
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 20

Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2013, 21:53
Thanks a lot. Even I was confused between (B) and (D), more for the reason that the argument wasn't very clear to me.
Now considering your explanation, I guess (B) can more be a conclusion than something that needs to be considered for evaluation of result.
_________________

KUDOS if you find it good!!

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 335
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 466 [0], given: 136

Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2013, 06:34
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
AlbertNTN wrote:
Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, and plants in cities typically grow more slowly than do plants in rural areas. In an experiment to see how much of the difference in growth is due to sulfur dioxide, classes in an urban and a rural school grew plants in greenhouse at their schools and filtered the greenhouse air to eliminate sulfur dioxide. Plants in the urban greenhouse grew more slowly than those in the rural greenhouse.
Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?
a. The urban school was located in a part of the city in which levels of sulfur dioxide in the air were usually far lower than is typical for urban areas
b. At both schools, the plants in the greenhouses grew much more quickly than did plants planted outdoors in plots near the greenhouse
c. The urban class conducting the experiment was larger than the rural class conducting the experiment
d. Heavy vehicular traffic such as is found in cities constantly deposits grime on greenhouse windows, reducing the amount of light that reaches the plants inside
e. Because of the higher levels of sulfur dioxide in the air at the urban school, the air filters for the urban school’s greenhouse were changed more frequently than were those at the rural school

Pls add in details of how u tackle the qsn. Thks

Responding to a pm:

LEt's understand the argument first:

There are two facts given:
1. Urban air has more sulphur dioxide.
2. Urban plants grow slower.

We want to find the effect of high sulphur dioxide in the air on the slow growth. Say, urban plants grow at the rate of 2 cm per month. Rural grow at 8 cm per month.
If we remove sulphur dioxide from air, we might see that urban plants grow at 6 cm per month while rural grow at 10 cm per month. This will show us the effect of higher sulphur dioxide. But these numbers will be dependable when everything else is kept the same. Only then we can separate out the contribution of higher levels of sulphur dioxide. If the urban greenhouse is different from the rural greenhouse, the difference could account for a part of the difference in growth rate too. Option (D) tells us that urban greenhouse gets lesser light. This means we cannot measure the contribution of higher sulphur dioxide to slower growth rate. Hence we need option (D) to evaluate the result.

Hello Experts,
I am having a hard time understanding this argument.

The argument says that they want to check the effect of SO2 on the growth of plants grown respectively in urban and in rural areas.
Now, the students are doing an experiment in green houses and they have filtered the S02. Now, isn't it the case that the plants should grow at equal rates because the only thing that hampering their growth was SO2. However, they have found that the difference in growth is still there. How come this be possible.

In nutshell, isn't the experiment itself is erroneous. that is, if you want to see the impact of sulphur dioxide on the growth rates of plants,and you are removing the SO2 from the atmosphere, then how can you judge the impact.

Thanks
imhimanshu
_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 335
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 466 [0], given: 136

Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2013, 22:11
Thanks Mike for the detailed explanation.
I would have answered this question had the question been Explain the paradox; The paradox being that despite controlled atmosphere, students found the difference in growth rates. And the answer Choice D would be apparent.
But, for Evaluate the argument, I usually apply "Variance Analysis" i.e testing the extremes and then analyzing the behavior of the argument.

Quote:
d. Heavy vehicular traffic such as is found in cities constantly deposits grime on greenhouse windows, reducing the amount of light that reaches the plants inside

Applying variance analysis:

Lets say that Yes. heavy vehicular traffic deposited grime on greenhouses windows, and reduced the light. -> It could be a possible factor in the difference of the growth rates of the plants.

However, if you say that there is no such grime deposited on greenhouse gases, and possibly the amount of light is same in greenhouses, then it is not describing the behavior of the growth rates.
Here, I am getting confused, if it is not the cause of difference in growth rates, then what could possibly be the factor behind the growth rates.

Another doubt is that I have seen evaluate questions comes in two varieties -
First is in which the answer choices starts with "Whether, Would , Were" etc that converts it into a form of question. In such questions, I can easily apply variance analysis.

However, second categories have plain answer choices such as the answer choices in this question.. then is it correct to apply Variance analysis here, or what should be the appropriate strategy.

Thanks
_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Re: Urban air contains more sulfur dioxide than does rural air,   [#permalink] 04 Oct 2013, 22:11

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 24 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Rural households have more purchasing power than do urban or suburban 0 15 Jul 2015, 00:01
Air travel is becoming increasingly more 6 29 Nov 2011, 20:08
11 Air travel is becoming increasingly more dangerous. In the 29 17 Jun 2009, 07:13
7 CR: air pollutants 27 26 Jun 2008, 02:56
1 Air travel is becoming increasingly more dangerous. In the 5 03 Feb 2008, 01:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by