Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 00:12

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

USC vs UCLA...

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

USC vs UCLA... [#permalink] New post 15 Feb 2010, 09:46
I recently took the gmatprep exam at home and got a score of 640 after several weeks of mild studying after work. Q48 V31. I was able to complete only 2/3 of verbal and 2/3 of quantitative parts on time. For the rest of the problems I had to guess in the final munutes. It seems that with practice I will be able to improve my score.
I currently have about 1 year of work experience (engineering) and I am considering USC and UCLA part time MBA. My employer will cover all tuition expenses. After looking at USC's and UCLA's class profiles and type of firms that do hiring at these schools it seems that UCLA provides a lot more opportunities for their graduates. My question is should I just apply to USC this year or is it worth of waiting one more year and try to get into UCLA with just 2 years of work experience?
Kaplan Promo CodeKnewton GMAT Discount CodesGMAT Pill GMAT Discount Codes
Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: Columbia, Wharton, LBS
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 592
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, LBS, Columbia, Wharton, HEC Paris
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 1

Re: USC vs UCLA... [#permalink] New post 16 Feb 2010, 13:47
muslikcat wrote:
I recently took the gmatprep exam at home and got a score of 640 after several weeks of mild studying after work. Q48 V31. I was able to complete only 2/3 of verbal and 2/3 of quantitative parts on time. For the rest of the problems I had to guess in the final munutes. It seems that with practice I will be able to improve my score.
I currently have about 1 year of work experience (engineering) and I am considering USC and UCLA part time MBA. My employer will cover all tuition expenses. After looking at USC's and UCLA's class profiles and type of firms that do hiring at these schools it seems that UCLA provides a lot more opportunities for their graduates. My question is should I just apply to USC this year or is it worth of waiting one more year and try to get into UCLA with just 2 years of work experience?



Business schools have started to admit younger candidates these days. So two years of work experience should not be a serious hindrance, as by the time you get in, you will have 3 years of experience. However, you need to establish your excellence to offset this potentially negative factor. So a top GMAT score will help, along with convincing essays. This is rather late to apply for fall 2010. You can still apply for USC to see how it goes and whether or not you will get in. Then if you decide to wait for a year to apply for UCLA, you will have more time to polish your essays and improve all aspects of the application.

If you need any help on your applications, let us know. We'd love to help you in any way we can. Good luck!
_________________

Manhattan Review GMAT Prep & MBA Admissions Consulting
Web: http://www.manhattanreview.com | Phone: +1.212.316.2000
Receive 20% off Admissions Consultings as GMATClub member!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2009
Posts: 56
Schools: Anderson FEMBA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 1

Re: USC vs UCLA... [#permalink] New post 16 Feb 2010, 14:31
640 is "probably" good enough to get you into USC's PM program. UCLA's average GMAT is 690-700 so you'd have some work ahead of you.

Since you have 1 year of experience under your belt, I'd recommend working another year and, while doing so, studying up on the verbal portion. With practice and a bit of time, you'll be able to increase your verbal score significantly.

Once you get your verbal to 38+, you'll be in 700 land (assuming your math stays where it is), and you'll have more options at your fingertips.

Who knows, after 2 years of work, you might want to go full time. If that's the case, you'll want to get a 730+ to take the GMAT hurdle out of the way.
Re: USC vs UCLA...   [#permalink] 16 Feb 2010, 14:31
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 USC vs UCLA veritasperditor 2 19 Jun 2012, 21:11
USC vs UCLA Catherine3 3 18 May 2012, 08:52
1 Insead vs UCLA/USC ray626SGV 1 07 May 2012, 09:05
1 UCLA FEMBA vs. USC.PM Tulosba82 2 13 Aug 2008, 20:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

USC vs UCLA...

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.