|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 810
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of [#permalink]
16 Nov 2005, 02:00
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of paint that lie buried beneath the surface layers of old paintings. They claim, for example, that additional mountainous scenery once appeared in Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa, which was later painted over. Skeptics reply to these claims, however, that X-ray examinations of the Mona Lisa do not show hidden mountains.
Which of the following, if true, would tend most to weaken the force of the skeptics’ objections?
(A) There is no written or anecdotal record that Leonardo da Vinci ever painted over major areas of his Mona Lisa.
(B) Painters of da Vinci’s time commonly created images of mountainous scenery in the backgrounds of portraits like the Mona Lisa.
(C) No one knows for certain what parts of the Mona Lisa may have been painted by da Vinci’s assistants rather than by da Vinci himself.
(D) Infrared photography of the Mona Lisa has revealed no trace of hidden mountainous scenery.
(E) Analysis relying on X-rays only has the capacity to detect lead-based white pigments in layers of paint beneath a painting’s surface layers.
I got the OA tru POE, but not quite convinced!
_________________
Cheers, Rahul.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 503
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
It has to be E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 503
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
It has to be E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1913
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
55
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR - Mona Lisa [#permalink]
16 Nov 2005, 04:22
Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of paint that lie buried beneath the surface layers of old paintings. They claim, for example, that additional mountainous scenery once appeared in Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa, which was later painted over. Skeptics reply to these claims, however, that X-ray examinations of the Mona Lisa do not show hidden mountains.
Which of the following, if true, would tend most to weaken the force of the skeptics’ objections?
(A) There is no written or anecdotal record that Leonardo da Vinci ever painted over major areas of his Mona Lisa.--->out of scope.
(B) Painters of da Vinci’s time commonly created images of mountainous scenery in the backgrounds of portraits like the Mona Lisa. ----> not related coz it doesn't mean that Da Vinci would have the same drawing style.
(C) No one knows for certain what parts of the Mona Lisa may have been painted by da Vinci’s assistants rather than by da Vinci himself.---> out of scope
(D) Infrared photography of the Mona Lisa has revealed no trace of hidden mountainous scenery.-----> even strengthen the skeptics' argument
(E) Analysis relying on X-rays only has the capacity to detect lead-based white pigments in layers of paint beneath a painting’s surface layers. --> Yeah~!
E it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Posts: 209
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
one more E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 233
Location: Germany
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR - Mona Lisa [#permalink]
16 Nov 2005, 11:50
rahulraao wrote: Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of paint that lie buried beneath the surface layers of old paintings. They claim, for example, that additional mountainous scenery once appeared in Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa, which was later painted over. Skeptics reply to these claims, however, that X-ray examinations of the Mona Lisa do not show hidden mountains.
Which of the following, if true, would tend most to weaken the force of the skeptics’ objections?
(A) There is no written or anecdotal record that Leonardo da Vinci ever painted over major areas of his Mona Lisa. (B) Painters of da Vinci’s time commonly created images of mountainous scenery in the backgrounds of portraits like the Mona Lisa. (C) No one knows for certain what parts of the Mona Lisa may have been painted by da Vinci’s assistants rather than by da Vinci himself. (D) Infrared photography of the Mona Lisa has revealed no trace of hidden mountainous scenery. (E) Analysis relying on X-rays only has the capacity to detect lead-based white pigments in layers of paint beneath a painting’s surface layers.
I got the OA tru POE, but not quite convinced!
E it is.
It is the only one (minus D) which addresses the argument and discusses Xrays. D would strengthen the argument, so E it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1741
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
15
[0], given: 0
|
yup I got E.
_________________
hey ya......
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1957
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
Yes it has to be E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 810
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Wonder where I got confused!! Seems a very clear E!
OA is E!
_________________
Cheers, Rahul.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar topics |
Author |
Replies |
Last post |
|
Similar Topics:
|
|
|
|
Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of
|
mbamantra |
3 |
15 Feb 2004, 07:51 |
|
|
|
Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of
|
cybera |
5 |
16 Jul 2005, 14:35 |
|
|
|
Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of
|
ak_idc |
2 |
10 Nov 2006, 07:38 |
|
|
|
Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of
|
mm007 |
4 |
11 Dec 2006, 00:21 |
|
|
|
Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of
|
surbab |
4 |
05 Apr 2007, 11:35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|