Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 22:12

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 798
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 01:00
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of paint that lie buried beneath the surface layers of old paintings. They claim, for example, that additional mountainous scenery once appeared in Leonardo da Vinciâ€™s Mona Lisa, which was later painted over. Skeptics reply to these claims, however, that X-ray examinations of the Mona Lisa do not show hidden mountains.

Which of the following, if true, would tend most to weaken the force of the skepticsâ€™ objections?

(A) There is no written or anecdotal record that Leonardo da Vinci ever painted over major areas of his Mona Lisa.
(B) Painters of da Vinciâ€™s time commonly created images of mountainous scenery in the backgrounds of portraits like the Mona Lisa.
(C) No one knows for certain what parts of the Mona Lisa may have been painted by da Vinciâ€™s assistants rather than by da Vinci himself.
(D) Infrared photography of the Mona Lisa has revealed no trace of hidden mountainous scenery.
(E) Analysis relying on X-rays only has the capacity to detect lead-based white pigments in layers of paint beneath a paintingâ€™s surface layers.

I got the OA tru POE, but not quite convinced!
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 503
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 02:26
It has to be E.
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 503
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 02:31
It has to be E.
SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1890
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 291 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Mona Lisa [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 03:22
Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of paint that lie buried beneath the surface layers of old paintings. They claim, for example, that additional mountainous scenery once appeared in Leonardo da Vinciâ€™s Mona Lisa, which was later painted over. Skeptics reply to these claims, however, that X-ray examinations of the Mona Lisa do not show hidden mountains.

Which of the following, if true, would tend most to weaken the force of the skepticsâ€™ objections?

(A) There is no written or anecdotal record that Leonardo da Vinci ever painted over major areas of his Mona Lisa.--->out of scope.
(B) Painters of da Vinciâ€™s time commonly created images of mountainous scenery in the backgrounds of portraits like the Mona Lisa. ----> not related coz it doesn't mean that Da Vinci would have the same drawing style.
(C) No one knows for certain what parts of the Mona Lisa may have been painted by da Vinciâ€™s assistants rather than by da Vinci himself.---> out of scope
(D) Infrared photography of the Mona Lisa has revealed no trace of hidden mountainous scenery.-----> even strengthen the skeptics' argument
(E) Analysis relying on X-rays only has the capacity to detect lead-based white pigments in layers of paint beneath a paintingâ€™s surface layers. --> Yeah~!

E it is.
Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Posts: 209
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 09:12
one more E.
Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 232
Location: Germany
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Mona Lisa [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 10:50
rahulraao wrote:
Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of paint that lie buried beneath the surface layers of old paintings. They claim, for example, that additional mountainous scenery once appeared in Leonardo da Vinciâ€™s Mona Lisa, which was later painted over. Skeptics reply to these claims, however, that X-ray examinations of the Mona Lisa do not show hidden mountains.

Which of the following, if true, would tend most to weaken the force of the skepticsâ€™ objections?

(A) There is no written or anecdotal record that Leonardo da Vinci ever painted over major areas of his Mona Lisa.
(B) Painters of da Vinciâ€™s time commonly created images of mountainous scenery in the backgrounds of portraits like the Mona Lisa.
(C) No one knows for certain what parts of the Mona Lisa may have been painted by da Vinciâ€™s assistants rather than by da Vinci himself.
(D) Infrared photography of the Mona Lisa has revealed no trace of hidden mountainous scenery.
(E) Analysis relying on X-rays only has the capacity to detect lead-based white pigments in layers of paint beneath a paintingâ€™s surface layers.

I got the OA tru POE, but not quite convinced!

E it is.

It is the only one (minus D) which addresses the argument and discusses Xrays. D would strengthen the argument, so E it is.
SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1723
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 326 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 11:19
yup I got E.
_________________

hey ya......

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1810
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 136 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 14:13
Yes it has to be E.
Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 798
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

16 Nov 2005, 14:31
Wonder where I got confused!! Seems a very clear E!
OA is E!
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

16 Nov 2005, 14:31
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers 4 01 Nov 2013, 14:04
2 Using new detection techniques, researchers have found 4 29 Oct 2012, 03:03
11 Using new detection techniques, researchers have found trace 7 31 Mar 2012, 09:26
Using computer techniques, researches analyze layers of 8 16 Mar 2008, 07:25
Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of 4 05 Apr 2007, 10:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Using computer techniques, researchers analyze layers of

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.