Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 12 Feb 2016, 16:46

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# UT McCombs $$vs. Duke/UCLA  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics Author Message Intern Status: growing longhorns Affiliations: NaFFA Joined: 06 Sep 2009 Posts: 2 Schools: UCLA, USC, Duke, UVA, UTexas, NYU WE 1: Consulting: Supply Chain WE 2: Asset Management: Global Macro / SE Asian PE Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0 UT McCombs$$$vs. Duke/UCLA [#permalink] 17 Mar 2011, 08:30 UT: accept with full ride Duke/UCLA: accept [will need to take on debt for nearly all tuition 100k] (I have no undergrad debt) Post MBA goals: Entrepreneurship / Health Care / Energy I work in an alternative investment firm, but post-MBA I'm interested in going startup route (either immediately after MBA or after working corporate for a few years). Regions: Prefer any land near Pacific Ocean... esp SoCal Personality: I see myself loving any of these 3 communities I have some friends who say the prestige / national recognition of Duke/UCLA would be worth paying up. I am a deer in the headlights right now any help weighing these options much appreciated! Veritas Prep Admissions Consultant Affiliations: Veritas Prep Joined: 25 Jul 2010 Posts: 1910 Followers: 44 Kudos [?]: 178 [0], given: 3 Re: UT McCombs $$vs. Duke/UCLA [#permalink] 17 Mar 2011, 09:02 Expert's post Well, let me start by disclosing that my MBA is from Duke--best experience of my life, and I have a few classmates on the West Coast. Having lived and worked in Los Angeles, however, I must grudgingly admit that if your long term goals are to be on the West Coast, you could not do better than UCLA. Don't underestimate the value of network. It becomes the most important component of a top MBA down the road--not always with the first job out of school, but moving up and on later, it will figure in more importantly. UT is a great school, but I personally feel you'd not regret spending the money to go to UCLA. Also, who knows? you may can get some traction by contacting admissions at UCLA to inform them of your scholarship to UT and see if you might be able to be considered for any financial assistance if you commit to UCLA. Worth a shot. _________________ Bryant Michaels Admissions Consultant VP Joined: 07 Apr 2009 Posts: 1172 Concentration: General Management, Strategy Schools: Duke (Fuqua) - Class of 2012 Followers: 35 Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 19 Re: UT McCombs$$$ vs. Duke/UCLA [#permalink]  17 Mar 2011, 09:06
Expert's post
First of all, congrats on the acceptances. This is what I call "a good problem to have."

All 3 schools have something to offer you. I think it's up to you to figure out what is the most important factor. B-school lesson #1 priortization

Fuqua - If you want to go into healthcare, Fuqua offers one of the BEST healthcare programs in the country (maybe the world). HSM has so much more resources at its disposal than the rest of the daytime MBA programs. There's also a decent entreprenuer program here.

McCombs - If you want to do energy. McCombs will probably offer you the best connections, especially if you want to go into traditional energy like Big Oil. McCombs is also known to have a good entrepreneur program. I believe there's an on campus incubator. The plus side is that you also get $100K to boot. Anderson - If you want to live in SoCal, Anderson will offer the best connections. However, if location is the primary concern, you will be able to get a job in SoCal out of the other to schools (pharma recruiting from Fuqua, and alternative energy developer from McCombs). As far as prestige, Anderson and McCombs are both regional schools and are on par with either other. Fuqua's brand carries well in the East Coast, but gets weaker as you move West. Bottomline: You can't go wrong with any of these schools. If I were in the position, I would take the$100K from McCombs and never look back.
Current Student
Joined: 02 Nov 2010
Posts: 92
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 2