sayantanc2k wrote:
There are two cities Armia and Banur, 50 miles away. A premium Bus service, Travel-One, has a non-stop bus service in the morning from Armia to Banur. Almost every day the bus remains filled to 90% of its capacity. The operator of Travel-One intends to fill up these 10% seats by making a halt enroute at Town Creepia. Which of the following, if true, would strengthen the operator’s plan the most?
A. There are no additional expenditure incurred in terms of fuel and other resources due to the stoppage.
B. There are very limited bus services to other cities from Creepia.
C. The passengers using the bus service presently use it because of non-stop service.
D. The people of Creepia presently use private vehicles to travel to other cities due to limited means of public transport.
E. Travel-One generally operates its bus service keeping the revenue as a priority.
Premise: There are two cities Armia and Banur, 50 miles away. A premium Bus service, Travel-One, has a non-stop bus service in the morning from Armia to Banur.
Almost every day the bus remains filled to 90% of its capacity. The operator of Travel-One intends to fill up these 10% seats by making a halt enroute at Town Creepia.
Kind of Conclusion : The operator of Travel-One intends to fill up these 10% seats by making a halt enroute at Town Creepia.
The unstated assumption is that when he stops at Town creepia that there would be people to take the journey to Banur.
Only option D takes part of our assumption that people will taking private vehicles, so when this premium bus service comes to that stop they'll board.
Option A deals that there are no additional expenses this is obvious statement which is already present in the argument, but this is not seen. Because at any cost bus must travel from A to B.