Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Jul 2016, 12:03
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Please select the correct answer.

  • 9% [8]
  • 16% [14]
  • 65% [56]
  • 8% [7]
  • 1% [1]
You may select 1 option
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1966
Followers: 1900

Kudos [?]: 6230 [0], given: 253

Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2013, 23:18
Expert's post
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (02:25) correct 45% (01:26) wrong based on 439 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

To determine the extent of tax fraud, the Internal Revenue Service audited the current year tax returns of a random set of 1000 individuals. Even though only 10% of the individuals in the group were self-employed (other 90% were working professionals), they accounted for 50% of the fraudulent cases.

For the group above, which of the following would be most useful in assessing whether tax fraud by self-employed individuals may be responsible for majority of the money that the IRS loses every year?

1. The trend of average income of self-employed individuals over the past few years compared to that of the rest of the group.
2. The difference between average annual taxes paid by a self-employed individual and a working professional.
3. The average tax fraud committed by a self-employed individual versus a working professional.
4. The diversity of demographics represented in the group versus that of the nation.
5. The number of women in the group who were working professionals versus self-employed.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________












1158 reviews | '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com


Last edited by egmat on 15 Feb 2013, 06:46, edited 1 time in total.
Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1966
Followers: 1900

Kudos [?]: 6230 [0], given: 253

Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2013, 23:18
Expert's post
Just added the OA. Will be providing the OE as soon as I come back (in a few hours)

Reserved for official explanation
Reserved for official explanation
_________________












1158 reviews | '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com


Last edited by egmat on 15 Feb 2013, 06:46, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Posts: 47
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 2

Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Feb 2013, 06:18
Premise :- 10% of self employed accounted for 50% of the fraudulent cases.
total frauds - 200, 100 - self employed, 100 - working professionals
money lost from 100 self employed > money lost from 100 working professionals.

Based on the premise we can assume that average money lost from self employed > average money lost from working professional

Conclusion(for sake of evaluation) :- Tax fraud by self employed is responsible for majority of loss in money

POE :-
A. This option talks about income levels - OFS
B. This option talks about differences in taxes paid, from this information we will not be able to infer anything about individual unpaid taxes - OFS
C. This is the correct answer, it talks about the fraud levels committed by each. a Yes/No answer will take the conclusion to the extreme choices.
D. Diversity of demographics - OFS
E. Number of women - OFS

IMO :- C
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2012
Posts: 5
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 2

Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Feb 2013, 06:27
b in my opinion ,quantum of loss may or may not be related to the number of tax frauds,50% may contribute to 10% of loss to irs and 10% may contribute 90% of loss...
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2012
Posts: 15
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V28
GMAT 2: 670 Q47 V35
GPA: 3.75
WE: Corporate Finance (Health Care)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 4

Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Feb 2013, 11:02
It should be C.

the number of ppl committing fraud in both groups is same so only the quantum of fraud or average fraud can impact the conculsion.
Current Student
avatar
Status: MBA Candidate, Class of 2017
Affiliations: SMU Cox
Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Posts: 195
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
GPA: 3.75
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 31

Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Feb 2013, 20:42
C is the correct option in my opinion

Sent from my Lumia 800 using Board Express
_________________

My GMAT debrief

greatness is not about possessing talent but about having the discipline to summon that talent whenever needed!!!

Please Kudos my post if it helped you!!

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 25 Dec 2012
Posts: 58
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Sustainability
Schools: Fisher '16 (M)
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 6

Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Feb 2013, 21:32
The question here is which of the following would be most useful in assessing whether tax fraud by self-employed individuals may be responsible for majority of the money that the IRS loses every year?

Majority of the money - For this average is not the right representation. (Money - average * total number).
Generalization from the 1000 samples may not be applicable. And for that we need the answer for option D).

egmat wrote:
Please use the poll above. We will post the OA on Tuesday.

To determine the extent of tax fraud, the Internal Revenue Service audited the current year tax returns of a random set of 1000 individuals. Even though only 10% of the individuals in the group were self-employed (other 90% were working professionals), they accounted for 50% of the fraudulent cases.

For the group above, which of the following would be most useful in assessing whether tax fraud by self-employed individuals may be responsible for majority of the money that the IRS loses every year?

1. The trend of average income of self-employed individuals over the past few years compared to that of the rest of the group.
2. The difference between average annual taxes paid by a self-employed individual and a working professional.
3. The average tax fraud committed by a self-employed individual versus a working professional.
4. The diversity of demographics represented in the group versus that of the nation.
5. The number of women in the group who were working professionals versus self-employed.
Current Student
avatar
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1095
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Followers: 37

Kudos [?]: 464 [0], given: 70

Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Feb 2013, 04:26
I think its C....We need to evaluate whether tax fraud by self employed may be the reason for the majority of the tas fraud. Hence we need to search for an option that establishes the truth of the number of the self employed people investigated. I mean in real scenario there are 3 partners for a single business group but if we see employed person , he is a single entity being questioned...So if all 3 partners are questioned than the single business is reiterated and hence can wrongly influence the survey.

Archit
Current Student
avatar
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1095
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Followers: 37

Kudos [?]: 464 [0], given: 70

Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2013, 02:35
Its thursday already, No OA ........It was supposed to be posted on tuesday.......Pls post OA...

Archit
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2012
Posts: 5
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 2

Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Feb 2013, 03:06
hmmm its friday still no answer.....lets do some critical reasoning about it.why is it so
a)they are very busy.
b)they have forgotten about the question
c)the information about answering on tuesday is a typo
these are some of the assumptions i have come up with...hope they explain the answer soon the suspense is killing me :)
Expert Post
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1966
Followers: 1900

Kudos [?]: 6230 [0], given: 253

Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Feb 2013, 06:49
Expert's post
Hi guys,

Just provided the OA. will provide the OE soon.

-Rajat
_________________












1158 reviews | '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2013
Posts: 96
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V34
GMAT 3: 700 Q46 V40
GMAT 4: 730 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.41
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 131

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jun 2013, 23:00
I support ans D.

What if the sample group is not representative of the complete nation?
As indicated in answer choice D. Maybe fraud by self employed account for majority of the sample group but not nation, which is more relevant for IRS.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 932
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 110

Kudos [?]: 697 [0], given: 546

Reviews Badge
Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jul 2014, 08:05
avik629 wrote:
I support ans D.

What if the sample group is not representative of the complete nation?
As indicated in answer choice D. Maybe fraud by self employed account for majority of the sample group but not nation, which is more relevant for IRS.


I think you missed the "For the group above". In fact even I missed it.

To determine the extent of tax fraud, the Internal Revenue Service audited the current year tax returns of a random set of 1000 individuals. Even though only 10% of the individuals in the group were self-employed (other 90% were working professionals), they accounted for 50% of the fraudulent cases.

For the group above, which of the following would be most useful in assessing whether tax fraud by self-employed individuals may be responsible for majority of the money that the IRS loses every year?

1. The trend of average income of self-employed individuals over the past few years compared to that of the rest of the group -
The trend is not required as we are having the actual data of the group - OFS - Incorrect
2. The difference between average annual taxes paid by a self-employed individual and a working professional.
If we don't calculate the average, one person might be a one off case (may be either of the extreme ) so we cannot determine - Incorrect
3. The average tax fraud committed by a self-employed individual versus a working professional -
For the group, this is correct
4. The diversity of demographics represented in the group versus that of the nation.
The question is for the group - So incorrect
5. The number of women in the group who were working professionals versus self-employed.
Completely OFS
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal
Struggling with GMAT ? Experience http://www.gmatify.com/
My Debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267.html#p1449379
My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961
My Linkedin Handle: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAIAAAbtjagB9G1MrEzTRYDRGroXuSmZO0ZhoK0

Please click on Kudos, if you think the post is helpful

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2015
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jan 2016, 06:39
egmat wrote:
Please use the poll above. We will post the OA on Tuesday.

To determine the extent of tax fraud, the Internal Revenue Service audited the current year tax returns of a random set of 1000 individuals. Even though only 10% of the individuals in the group were self-employed (other 90% were working professionals), they accounted for 50% of the fraudulent cases.

For the group above, which of the following would be most useful in assessing whether tax fraud by self-employed individuals may be responsible for majority of the money that the IRS loses every year?

1. The trend of average income of self-employed individuals over the past few years compared to that of the rest of the group.
2. The difference between average annual taxes paid by a self-employed individual and a working professional.
3. The average tax fraud committed by a self-employed individual versus a working professional.
4. The diversity of demographics represented in the group versus that of the nation.
5. The number of women in the group who were working professionals versus self-employed.


The official answer is 3. But in my opinion, the wordings of the answer make it questionable. "The average tax fraud committed" does not give indication whether this is the total number of cases or the total amount of dollar value of the fraud. If it is the latter, then the choice is clear.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Feb 2015
Posts: 84
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 28

Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jan 2016, 06:54
zurich wrote:
egmat wrote:
Please use the poll above. We will post the OA on Tuesday.

To determine the extent of tax fraud, the Internal Revenue Service audited the current year tax returns of a random set of 1000 individuals. Even though only 10% of the individuals in the group were self-employed (other 90% were working professionals), they accounted for 50% of the fraudulent cases.

For the group above, which of the following would be most useful in assessing whether tax fraud by self-employed individuals may be responsible for majority of the money that the IRS loses every year?

1. The trend of average income of self-employed individuals over the past few years compared to that of the rest of the group.
2. The difference between average annual taxes paid by a self-employed individual and a working professional.
3. The average tax fraud committed by a self-employed individual versus a working professional.
4. The diversity of demographics represented in the group versus that of the nation.
5. The number of women in the group who were working professionals versus self-employed.


The official answer is 3. But in my opinion, the wordings of the answer make it questionable. "The average tax fraud committed" does not give indication whether this is the total number of cases or the total amount of dollar value of the fraud. If it is the latter, then the choice is clear.


I agree. C does not make clear if it's dollar amount or total cases. Do we need this information to answer the question? I don't think so, because it's asking what information is needed.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2015
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jan 2016, 08:04
gmatser1 wrote:
zurich wrote:
egmat wrote:
Please use the poll above. We will post the OA on Tuesday.

To determine the extent of tax fraud, the Internal Revenue Service audited the current year tax returns of a random set of 1000 individuals. Even though only 10% of the individuals in the group were self-employed (other 90% were working professionals), they accounted for 50% of the fraudulent cases.

For the group above, which of the following would be most useful in assessing whether tax fraud by self-employed individuals may be responsible for majority of the money that the IRS loses every year?

1. The trend of average income of self-employed individuals over the past few years compared to that of the rest of the group.
2. The difference between average annual taxes paid by a self-employed individual and a working professional.
3. The average tax fraud committed by a self-employed individual versus a working professional.
4. The diversity of demographics represented in the group versus that of the nation.
5. The number of women in the group who were working professionals versus self-employed.


The official answer is 3. But in my opinion, the wordings of the answer make it questionable. "The average tax fraud committed" does not give indication whether this is the total number of cases or the total amount of dollar value of the fraud. If it is the latter, then the choice is clear.


I agree. C does not make clear if it's dollar amount or total cases. Do we need this information to answer the question? I don't think so, because it's asking what information is needed.


I think I need it. If it is the total number of cases, we do not actually need that information in evaluating who may be responsible for the majority of the money loss every year. For instance, if self employed contribute to more than 50% of the cases, but the monetary value of these cases are small (less than 50% than that caused by the other group), then they are not the one responsible for the majority of money loss.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Posts: 194
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GMAT Date: 11-23-2015
GPA: 3.6
WE: Science (Other)
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 360 [0], given: 28

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jan 2016, 10:07
Hello,

C is correct choice here. There are some flaws in analysis done by people about this choice.

Question Stem:

Which of the following would be most useful in assessing

whether tax fraud by self-employed individuals may be responsible

for

majority of the money that the IRS loses every year?


Choice C mentions that "the average tax fraud " (ATF) committed by a self-employed individual versus a working professional

There could be following cases:

1. ATF self-employed individual > ATF working professional

In this case self employed individuals would be responsible for loses to IRS.

See even though the number of self employed individuals are only 10% vis a vis working professional numbers (90%). A higher ATF clearly indicates that the total loses due to tax fraud are due to self employed individuals.

We are not at concerned with the exact number of defaulters in either self-employed or working professionals.

2. ATF self-employed individual < ATF working professional


In this case self employed individuals would not be responsible for loses to IRS

Hope it helps!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Nov 2015
Posts: 461
Location: United States (LA)
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GRE 1: 328 Q167 V161
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 177

Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2016, 13:51
If we are able to determine difference between the average tax fraud committed by a self-employed individual versus a working professional we can easily resolve the issue whether tax fraud by self-employed individuals may be responsible for majority of the money that the IRS loses every year
correct answer - C
Re: Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud   [#permalink] 27 Apr 2016, 13:51
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Income Tax Onell 4 21 Mar 2011, 05:12
When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable vksunder 0 26 Aug 2013, 22:59
When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable lexis 0 19 Jan 2013, 10:04
Politician: All nations that place a high tax on income Fistail 5 28 Aug 2007, 13:02
When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable wunderbar03 0 19 Jan 2013, 02:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Evaluate 2: Income Tax fraud

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.