Virginia Woolf made an original contribution to the form : GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 11:16

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Virginia Woolf made an original contribution to the form

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Moderator
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done!!
Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Posts: 699
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 1024 [0], given: 226

Virginia Woolf made an original contribution to the form [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2013, 23:34
Question 1
00:00

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

Question Stats:

50% (00:00) correct 50% (00:00) wrong based on 2

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00

Question Stats:

50% (00:00) correct 50% (00:00) wrong based on 2

### HideShow timer Statistics

Virginia Woolf made an original contribution to the form of the novel, but was also a distinguished essayist, a critic for The Times Literary Supplement, and a central figure of the Bloomsbury group. Dialogic in style and continually questioning what may be the reader‘s opinion (her rejection of an authoritative voice links her to the tradition of Montaigne), her critical essays, when examined carefully, reveal a thematic and technical complexity that rivals her novels.

Some of her most rigorous essays suggest that the personality of the author can be fixed if sufficient evidence can be amassed and if its logical implications are followed. In ―The Novels of Turgenev,‖ Woolf pursues the problem of interpretation on the part of the reader by providing a detailed report of her own response to Turgenev. She does this in order to make possible the question that leaps the gap between reader and text. That question—―what principles guided Turgenev?‖—focuses on the fictional strategies that must have been in operation in order to have produced Woolf's experience. Thus Woolf accounts for this by reconstructing Turgenev‘s method. But she pushes farther insofar as she asserts that the method must be a sign of a deeper informing power, the mind of Turgenev itself. This distance can be traversed by interpretation, Woolf argues, because writers like Turgenev achieve a level of personality beneath the surface distinctions among individuals. Her greatest examples of this impersonal power in the English language are Jane Austen and Shakespeare. According to Woolf, these authors write with a ―clarity of heart and spirit‖ that allows their potential for genius to express itself ―whole an entire.‖ Unencumbered by impediments that would be erected by such feelings on their part as fear, hatred, or dependency, we are allowed by their art to make contact with what is most deeply personal, and therefore most widely human, in them.

But one of the riches of Woolf‘s essays is that they critique this very same possibility of closing the gap that exists between author and audience. This is evinced in Woolf‘s awareness of the contemporary artist‘s self-consciousness: the enemy of human contact and knowing. There seem to be so many barriers on the road to the deepest level of self that the journey there is impossible, but it is this level of self through which the gap must be closed. In fact, Woolf asserts that the journey is impossible for the modern writer. In ―How It Strikes a Contemporary,‖ Woolf contrasts writers of the past—Chaucer is her most powerful example—who believed wholeheartedly in an atemporal order verified by the entire culture, with modern writers who have lost this advantage. Woolf suggests that, if, for writer and reader, no way to a shared, universal level of experience is available, the very ground of the interpretive enterprise is removed.

1. Which of the following would most weaken Woolf‘s assertion that the distance between reader and writer can be traversed by interpretation?

A. Contemporary writers are unable to construct a deep meaning for each reader because they focus primarily on personal distinctions rather than similarities.
B. Every reader reacts differently to the same text and yet each constructs for himself/herself a similar idea of the author‘s personality and presence.
C. Past writers were governed by a strong sense of individualism, which made it impossible for them to appeal to human commonalities.
D. Authorial intent or perspective remains an abstract idea unless the writer is able to confirm or deny the reader‘s interpretation.
E. Most readers are not learned enough to be able to understand the deeper meaning that is implied by the author
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

2. According to the points elucidated by the author within the passage, all of the following are characteristic of Woolf‘s essays EXCEPT that:

A. they focus primarily on examining whether or not a reader‘s experience of a text can reveal the original authorial presence.
B. they are written in a more technically and thematically complex manner than are her fictional works.
C. they betray Woolf‘s skepticism about the very idea she is attempting to demonstrate and justify.
D. they frequently utilize examples from other writers in order to illustrate and support her conclusions.
E. they are as complex as her other works
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B

3. The passage implies that, in her essay ―The Novels of Turgenev,‖ Woolf assumes that:

A. stable and defining qualities of an author‘s personality are discernible in his or her fiction.
B. interpretation involves a compromise between the reader‘s perspective and the perspective of the author.
C. a reader‘s experience of a novel‘s text is determined by a standard set of fictional principles.
D. making contact with an author‘s mind requires the use of critical reasoning more than intuition.
E. an author‘s literary work must reflect the various facets of the author‘s personality
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #1 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #2 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #3 OA

_________________

Last edited by Gnpth on 21 Oct 2013, 03:02, edited 1 time in total.
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Intern
Joined: 09 Oct 2012
Posts: 1
Schools: Cranfield '16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 4

Re: Virginia Woolf made an original contribution to the form [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2013, 02:38
1. e
2. b
3. c

Could anyone please discuss 1 and 3
Moderator
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done!!
Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Posts: 699
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 1024 [0], given: 226

Re: Virginia Woolf made an original contribution to the form [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2013, 03:15
savvysatyam wrote:
1. e
2. b
3. c

Could anyone please discuss 1 and 3

Question 1:
Woolf argues that readers can understand the writer‘s intent and personality through interpretation--- This is what we found from the understanding.

A: Correctly weakens the above- Hold.

B:This would strengthen Woolf‘s idea that individual readers can use their own experience to discover the author‘s original intent and personality.Opposite.

C:Even if this is true, it would still presumably be possible for individual writers to use their own experiences to figure out what the author was getting at. Out of Scope.

D: While it is true that Woolf thinks that interpretation can close the gap between reader and writer, while it says that the writer has to directly confirm interpretations for them to be valid. it merely a claim that contradicts Woolf and does not give any meaningful support- Out of Scope.

E: Nothing to deal with the qualification of the reader. Out of scope

Correct Answer is A.

Question 3:

We get it from paraphrasing the main point from the second paragraph, Now lets look for assumption in the answer choice,

A:which simply restates the point that readers can figure out part of the author‘s personality. If it isn‘t true, the argument falls apart- So hold on.

B:. Woolf is arguing that the reader‘s perspective can be used to discover the perspective of the author; there‘s no discussion of compromise.Opposite

C:Woolf is arguing that the reader uses personal experiences, not standards, to interpret the text.Opposite.

D: If personal experiences are most necessary to understanding the author, then it would seem that intuition is more important than critical reasoning. Opposite.

E: Must‘ is extreme language-Out of scope

So the Answer is A.

Hope it helps
_________________
Re: Virginia Woolf made an original contribution to the form   [#permalink] 21 Oct 2013, 03:15
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The original Hellenistic community was idealized, the 6 15 Sep 2011, 10:36
Public general hospitals originated in the almshouse 12 20 Jul 2010, 02:16
======== The origin of the theory that major geologic events 8 20 Mar 2009, 20:17
Public general hospitals originated in the almshouse 3 25 Jul 2008, 07:02
8 The belief that art originates in intuitive rather than 7 28 Jan 2007, 19:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Virginia Woolf made an original contribution to the form

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.