Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? : GMAT Verbal Section
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 Jan 2017, 03:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum?

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

### Should this forum be split into SC, CR, and RC sub-forums?

• 80% [17]
• 14% [3]
• 4% [1]
• 0% [0]
Author Message
Founder
Affiliations: AS - Gold, HH-Diamond
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 14457
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
Followers: 3726

Kudos [?]: 23040 [0], given: 4515

Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2009, 19:00
Following up on a suggestion from nitya34 and technext (t76017-have-a-suggestion-post-it-here), we would like to get your opinion about restructuring this Verbal forum into 3 sub-forums as following:

Sentence Correction Subforum
Critical Reasoning Subforum

Suggested reasons for change: clear classification of questions and therefore easier to find practice questions of the desired type.

Please cast your votes. Voting will be open for 5 days. All comments are welcome.
_________________

Founder of GMAT Club

US News Rankings progression - last 10 years in a snapshot - New!
Just starting out with GMAT? Start here...
Need GMAT Book Recommendations? Best GMAT Books

Co-author of the GMAT Club tests

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 838
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 71 [2] , given: 0

Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2009, 19:19
2
KUDOS
Nahh..they arent seperate on the GMAT test. We need to train our brains to quickly switch amoung the three
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 877
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 363 [1] , given: 7

Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2009, 01:40
1
KUDOS
If possible, it would be much more useful to separate questions according to source (say, GMATPrep, G-club, and the rest).
Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 912
Followers: 69

Kudos [?]: 573 [1] , given: 17

Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2009, 02:17
1
KUDOS
Yes
it will be hepful for future users also as navigation will be far easier
guys, pls vote

botirvoy wrote:
If possible, it would be much more useful to separate questions according to source (say, GMATPrep, G-club, and the rest).

_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-polygons-87336.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 111
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 191 [1] , given: 0

Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2009, 05:41
1
KUDOS
nitya34 wrote:
Yes
it will be hepful for future users also as navigation will be far easier
guys, pls vote

botirvoy wrote:
If possible, it would be much more useful to separate questions according to source (say, GMATPrep, G-club, and the rest).

Yes, I too agree that segregating it on the basis of source will be good from navigation perspective but I feel that separation should first be on the basis of question type (SC/CR/RC).

Any further division (I guess, just one more according to source) will make it just perfect.

Regards,
Technext
_________________

+++ Believe me, it doesn't take much of an effort to underline SC questions. Just try it out. +++
+++ Please tell me why other options are wrong. +++

~~~ The only way to get smarter is to play a smarter opponent. ~~~

Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 877
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 363 [1] , given: 7

Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2009, 14:14
1
KUDOS
Technext wrote:
nitya34 wrote:
Yes
it will be hepful for future users also as navigation will be far easier
guys, pls vote

botirvoy wrote:
If possible, it would be much more useful to separate questions according to source (say, GMATPrep, G-club, and the rest).

Yes, I too agree that segregating it on the basis of source will be good from navigation perspective but I feel that separation should first be on the basis of question type (SC/CR/RC).

Any further division (I guess, just one more according to source) will make it just perfect.

Regards,
Technext

ease of navigation is a minor luxury compared to some of the other benefits. Often, say, GMATPrep questions are posted without citing the source - this will result in biased test results. Segregating such prominent sources would help.
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1286
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 411 [1] , given: 0

Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2009, 02:06
1
KUDOS
I had also suggested the similar thing in one of my previous posts. Kindly classify the verbal questions into 3 categories. This will help us in practicing on our wea areas better.
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 497
Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 52 [1] , given: 13

Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2009, 08:00
1
KUDOS
Hi mates,

agree with all of you that support to split the forum into RC/CR/SC

however, I don't think splitting the forum according to the source is very useful.

And also, I think it's easier for moderators to classify the questions already posted among the 3 types than among the source (BTW, that task must be a nightmare)

Cheers
_________________

mates, please visit my profile and leave comments
http://gmatclub.com/forum/johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html

I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me

I'm already focused on my application package

My experience in my second attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312
My experience in my third attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275

Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 877
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 363 [1] , given: 7

Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2009, 02:03
1
KUDOS
bb wrote:
ease of navigation is a minor luxury compared to some of the other benefits. Often, say, GMATPrep questions are posted without citing the source - this will result in biased test results. Segregating such prominent sources would help.

What other sources would you suggest would be valuable to identify?
I see the point of GMATPrep since it is the only real test with real questions, but why bother with OG or Kaplan, or others?

About ease of navigation - suggesting a sub-forum to a sub-forum of a forum will be hard to navigate for new members who may not be as familiar with the layout. Also, if only one question is posted in each of the sub-forums, then you will have to visit 3 sub-forums vs. staying in one, so navigation-wise, having additional sub-forums would be a negative.

bb,
I guess, segregating according to source would make copyright thing even more problematic. Furthermore, of course, it is of little value to have 5 folders for 5 different sources. I like how MGMAT forum approaches such segregation; they have "general folder", "MGMAT folder", and "GMATPrep folder".

re separating according to SC, CR, RC: although there are clear benefits for doing so, I believe this will lead to fragmentation of forum participation. I find it undesirable.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 994
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 196 [1] , given: 5

Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2009, 12:19
1
KUDOS
I will probably be the only one to say that segregating into different directories is a bad idea.

It does make navigating a whole lot easier, but I like the fact I can browse through one forum and answer any verbal questions in any order, regardless of question type.

This is good practice, and somewhat simulates GMATPREP as it doesn't give you all the same question types in a row. It forces you to switch gear and giving you good practice in handling all different type of questions. Though, I must admit I don't really read any RC questions though

What I think we really need is a mechanism to force the Original Poster to post an OA after a certain amount of time (2-3 weeks). So many good questions are posted, but then become useless threads (in my opinion) because the Original Poster is just too lazy/inconsiderate/forgetful to post the OA. This I think really hinders the learning of others, and we are left wondering.

For example - we should have a input box that takes in the OA from the Original Poster and stores it in memory, and then after 2-3 weeks, use a bot to spit out the answer in as a post. Therefore, we are not dependent on the poster to come back with an answer. Not sure how feasible this is, but this would be pretty cool It'd be best if there's an OE, but I don't think that's realistic.
SVP
Status: Burning mid-night oil....daily
Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Posts: 2400
Schools: Yale SOM 2011 Alum, Kellogg, Booth, Tuck
WE 1: IB - Restructuring & Distressed M&A
Followers: 78

Kudos [?]: 733 [1] , given: 548

Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2009, 12:36
1
KUDOS
If segregating the GMAT forum by different categories displease some people, then is there a way users can search/filter by different categories?

For example, if a post in GMAT forum has some kinda "label" (as additional field in the database table) that identifies this post as "GMAT Verbal - SC" or something, then the user can just filter for only SC questions if he/she wants to.
_________________
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 994
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 196 [1] , given: 5

Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2009, 12:46
1
KUDOS
bb wrote:

About the OA - there is a change we can make fairly painlessly - it is called Hidden text - by default a section or a line or a word can be hidden and would require you to click on a button to make that portion visible. That means you would not see the answer if you did not want to, but you easily can, so I don't know if that misses the whole point.

Another thought is to create a reminder that would remind the user to post the OA and Explanation, but I don't know how feasible that is.

I think it can work, as long as it doesn't impact participation from others because the OA is readily available. I'm just afraid that if people see the OA early, then they would be less likely to respond, and just move on. But I think people here are generally very good in participating regardless. There are some really excellent members here.
Founder
Affiliations: AS - Gold, HH-Diamond
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 14457
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
Followers: 3726

Kudos [?]: 23040 [0], given: 4515

Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2009, 16:02
ease of navigation is a minor luxury compared to some of the other benefits. Often, say, GMATPrep questions are posted without citing the source - this will result in biased test results. Segregating such prominent sources would help.

What other sources would you suggest would be valuable to identify?
I see the point of GMATPrep since it is the only real test with real questions, but why bother with OG or Kaplan, or others?

About ease of navigation - suggesting a sub-forum to a sub-forum of a forum will be hard to navigate for new members who may not be as familiar with the layout. Also, if only one question is posted in each of the sub-forums, then you will have to visit 3 sub-forums vs. staying in one, so navigation-wise, having additional sub-forums would be a negative.
_________________

Founder of GMAT Club

US News Rankings progression - last 10 years in a snapshot - New!
Just starting out with GMAT? Start here...
Need GMAT Book Recommendations? Best GMAT Books

Co-author of the GMAT Club tests

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Founder
Affiliations: AS - Gold, HH-Diamond
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 14457
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
Followers: 3726

Kudos [?]: 23040 [0], given: 4515

Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2009, 22:16
botirvoy wrote:
bb,
I guess, segregating according to source would make copyright thing even more problematic. Furthermore, of course, it is of little value to have 5 folders for 5 different sources. I like how MGMAT forum approaches such segregation; they have "general folder", "MGMAT folder", and "GMATPrep folder".

re separating according to SC, CR, RC: although there are clear benefits for doing so, I believe this will lead to fragmentation of forum participation. I find it undesirable.

Sent you a PM
_________________

Founder of GMAT Club

US News Rankings progression - last 10 years in a snapshot - New!
Just starting out with GMAT? Start here...
Need GMAT Book Recommendations? Best GMAT Books

Co-author of the GMAT Club tests

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Founder
Affiliations: AS - Gold, HH-Diamond
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 14457
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
Followers: 3726

Kudos [?]: 23040 [0], given: 4515

Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2009, 09:34
Voting is finished. We'll be moving forward with the new structure and expect it to be in place by end of weekend.
_________________

Founder of GMAT Club

US News Rankings progression - last 10 years in a snapshot - New!
Just starting out with GMAT? Start here...
Need GMAT Book Recommendations? Best GMAT Books

Co-author of the GMAT Club tests

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Founder
Affiliations: AS - Gold, HH-Diamond
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 14457
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
Followers: 3726

Kudos [?]: 23040 [0], given: 4515

Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2009, 12:32
I will probably be the only one to say that segregating into different directories is a bad idea.

It does make navigating a whole lot easier, but I like the fact I can browse through one forum and answer any verbal questions in any order, regardless of question type.

This is good practice, and somewhat simulates GMATPREP as it doesn't give you all the same question types in a row. It forces you to switch gear and giving you good practice in handling all different type of questions. Though, I must admit I don't really read any RC questions though

What I think we really need is a mechanism to force the Original Poster to post an OA after a certain amount of time (2-3 weeks). So many good questions are posted, but then become useless threads (in my opinion) because the Original Poster is just too lazy/inconsiderate/forgetful to post the OA. This I think really hinders the learning of others, and we are left wondering.

For example - we should have a input box that takes in the OA from the Original Poster and stores it in memory, and then after 2-3 weeks, use a bot to spit out the answer in as a post. Therefore, we are not dependent on the poster to come back with an answer. Not sure how feasible this is, but this would be pretty cool It'd be best if there's an OE, but I don't think that's realistic.

Thanks for the feedback and ideas - the plan is to split the forum for 30 days and then get another measurement of user input.
(I am probably another person who is against the split, but I don't participate much in this forum, so my opinion does not count )

About the OA - there is a change we can make fairly painlessly - it is called Hidden text - by default a section or a line or a word can be hidden and would require you to click on a button to make that portion visible. That means you would not see the answer if you did not want to, but you easily can, so I don't know if that misses the whole point.

Another thought is to create a reminder that would remind the user to post the OA and Explanation, but I don't know how feasible that is.
_________________

Founder of GMAT Club

US News Rankings progression - last 10 years in a snapshot - New!
Just starting out with GMAT? Start here...
Need GMAT Book Recommendations? Best GMAT Books

Co-author of the GMAT Club tests

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Founder
Affiliations: AS - Gold, HH-Diamond
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 14457
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
Followers: 3726

Kudos [?]: 23040 [0], given: 4515

Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2009, 12:56
bb wrote:

About the OA - there is a change we can make fairly painlessly - it is called Hidden text - by default a section or a line or a word can be hidden and would require you to click on a button to make that portion visible. That means you would not see the answer if you did not want to, but you easily can, so I don't know if that misses the whole point.

Another thought is to create a reminder that would remind the user to post the OA and Explanation, but I don't know how feasible that is.

I think it can work, as long as it doesn't impact participation from others because the OA is readily available. I'm just afraid that if people see the OA early, then they would be less likely to respond, and just move on. But I think people here are generally very good in participating regardless. There are some really excellent members here.

Here is how it would look just for a point of reference:
http://www.absoluteanime.com/forum/view ... 95&t=30329

Click on [Reveal] Spoiler:
_________________

Founder of GMAT Club

US News Rankings progression - last 10 years in a snapshot - New!
Just starting out with GMAT? Start here...
Need GMAT Book Recommendations? Best GMAT Books

Co-author of the GMAT Club tests

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 994
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 5

Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2009, 13:09
Looks good!
Re: Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum?   [#permalink] 05 Mar 2009, 13:09
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
15 Biggest Mistakes You Should Avoid in GMAT Verbal 2 06 Feb 2014, 12:06
14 Rules for Posting in Verbal GMAT forum 0 18 Jun 2012, 10:03
1 Please welcome Gmanjesh as a new Verbal GMAT Forum Moderator 11 16 Aug 2009, 20:55
New Verbal Forum Structure 2 06 Mar 2009, 22:20
Should help structure 2 21 Nov 2008, 07:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Vote - Should We Change the Structure of Verbal GMAT Forum?

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.