Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 23 May 2016, 23:48

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2012
Posts: 147
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 128 [0], given: 37

W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2013, 02:37
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (03:07) correct 45% (01:33) wrong based on 185 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economic problem; it will undoubtedly cost the majority party votes in the coming elections.
Z: I disagree. Statistics for the past 40 years show that there is no significant relationship between the prevailing level of employment and political gains or losses by the party that happens to be in the majority at election time.

Which of the following most seriously weakens the force of Z's counterargument?

A. Z fails to cite any actual figures
B. Z's decision to consider a time span of 40 years seem arbitrary
C. Z relies on conventional criteria for the notion of a significant relationship
D. Z's statistics focus on level of unemployment, rather than direction of change
E. Z assumes that there is no connection between economic and political trends
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Please give Kudos if you like the post

VP
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1123
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 169

Kudos [?]: 1697 [2] , given: 219

Re: rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2013, 02:45
2
KUDOS
W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economic problem; it will undoubtedly cost the majority party votes in the coming elections.
Z: I disagree. Statistics for the past 40 years show that there is no significant relationship between the prevailing level of employment and political gains or losses by the party that happens to be in the majority at election time.

W and Z do not talk about the same thing: W cites the rise of the level of unemployment, but Z replies by citing the level of employment overall.
W cites a trend, W cites an overall number not related to a rise/fall of the level itself => they are talking about two different things.

D. Z's statistics focus on level of unemployment, rather than direction of change
is correct
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Intern
Joined: 15 Mar 2013
Posts: 28
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT Date: 08-07-2013
GPA: 3.33
WE: Consulting (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 13

Re: rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2013, 05:12
summer101 wrote:
W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economic problem; it will undoubtedly cost the majority party votes in the coming elections.
Z: I disagree. Statistics for the past 40 years show that there is no significant relationship between the prevailing level of employment and political gains or losses by the party that happens to be in the majority at election time.

Which of the following most seriously weakens the force of Z's counterargument?

A. Z fails to cite any actual figures
B. Z's decision to consider a time span of 40 years seem arbitrary
C. Z relies on conventional criteria for the notion of a significant relationship
D. Z's statistics focus on level of unemployment, rather than direction of change
E. Z assumes that there is no connection between economic and political trends

D for me too!
A ( not a perfect flaw ) & B ( seems? doesnt weaken the argument anyways ) are unconvincing in themselves.
C is a generalized statement and may /maynot weaken this argument.
E - Economic and Political trends are too vague to be applicable to this specific situation!
Princeton Review Representative
Joined: 17 Jun 2013
Posts: 163
Followers: 135

Kudos [?]: 260 [0], given: 0

Re: W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2013, 15:42
Expert's post
On Weaken questions you are sometimes looking for a shift in the author's words. The original argument discusses the rise in unemployment and Z responds with wording discussing the level of unemployment. This shift in language opens up an opportunity for assumptions - assuming that both words are the same.

Thus D shows the assumption between the level of unemployment and the rise in unemployment and therefore weakens the article.
_________________

Special offer! Save $250 on GMAT Ultimate Classroom, GMAT Small Group Instruction, or GMAT Liveonline when you use the promo code GCVERBAL250. Or, save$150 on GMAT Self-Prep when you use the code GCVERBAL150. Enroll at www.princetonreview.com

Manager
Joined: 14 Nov 2011
Posts: 149
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.61
WE: Consulting (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 102

Re: rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jul 2013, 07:48
Zarrolou wrote:
W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economic problem; it will undoubtedly cost the majority party votes in the coming elections.
Z: I disagree. Statistics for the past 40 years show that there is no significant relationship between the prevailing level of employment and political gains or losses by the party that happens to be in the majority at election time.

W and Z do not talk about the same thing: W cites the rise of the level of unemployment, but Z replies by citing the level of employment overall.
W cites a trend, W cites an overall number not related to a rise/fall of the level itself => they are talking about two different things.

D. Z's statistics focus on level of unemployment, rather than direction of change
is correct

Hi,
What does "direction of change mean" ?
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 150
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 41

Re: W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jul 2013, 21:02
summer101 wrote:
W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economic problem; it will undoubtedly cost the majority party votes in the coming elections.
Z: I disagree. Statistics for the past 40 years show that there is no significant relationship between the prevailing level of employment and political gains or losses by the party that happens to be in the majority at election time.

Which of the following most seriously weakens the force of Z's counterargument?

A. Z fails to cite any actual figures
B. Z's decision to consider a time span of 40 years seem arbitrary
C. Z relies on conventional criteria for the notion of a significant relationship
D. Z's statistics focus on level of unemployment, rather than direction of change
E. Z assumes that there is no connection between economic and political trends

Can someone post the explanation for option C...??
_________________

MODULUS Concept ---> inequalities-158054.html#p1257636
HEXAGON Theory ---> hexagon-theory-tips-to-solve-any-heaxgon-question-158189.html#p1258308

Director
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 842
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Followers: 50

Kudos [?]: 1009 [0], given: 197

Re: rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jul 2013, 22:46
cumulonimbus wrote:
Zarrolou wrote:
W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economic problem; it will undoubtedly cost the majority party votes in the coming elections.
Z: I disagree. Statistics for the past 40 years show that there is no significant relationship between the prevailing level of employment and political gains or losses by the party that happens to be in the majority at election time.

W and Z do not talk about the same thing: W cites the rise of the level of unemployment, but Z replies by citing the level of employment overall.
W cites a trend, W cites an overall number not related to a rise/fall of the level itself => they are talking about two different things.

D. Z's statistics focus on level of unemployment, rather than direction of change
is correct

Hi,
What does "direction of change mean" ?

hi,

actually it means:
Z's statistics focus on level of unemployment, rather than direction of change in unemployment.
W==>He is focussing on rapid RISE (CHANGE ) in employment.
Z==>He is focussing on on current level of unemployment and not the CHANGE (RISE)IN EMPLOYMENT.

hope it helps
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...

learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... assessment

Director
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 842
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Followers: 50

Kudos [?]: 1009 [1] , given: 197

Re: W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jul 2013, 22:55
1
KUDOS
jaituteja wrote:

Can someone post the explanation for option C...??

Hi,
actually conventional means: what is typical and ordinary and that which follows accepted standards of behavior or taste.

now C says:
C. Z relies on conventional criteria for the notion of a significant relationship====>means whatever Z is thinking is typical and normal ..and is accepted by all.....but this is not the case...it is not typically accepted.....rather Z has collected data of last 40 years and he himself came to the conclusion.,so no consensus is their....hence that is why this wrong..
hope it helps.

SKM
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...

learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... assessment

Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2012
Posts: 144
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 27

Re: W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2013, 02:36
very good Explanation by Zarrolous , I chose C at first but after reading the explanations I could see how wrong m y approach is
_________________

Regards,
Abhinav

GMAT 1 - 580 (Q47 V23) a-tight-slap-on-face-149457.html

GMAT 2 - 670 (Q48 V34) 670-one-month-off-from-office-and-2-months-hard-work-163761.html#p1297561

Manager
Joined: 14 Nov 2011
Posts: 149
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.61
WE: Consulting (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 102

Re: rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2013, 08:01
shaileshmishra wrote:
cumulonimbus wrote:
Zarrolou wrote:
W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economic problem; it will undoubtedly cost the majority party votes in the coming elections.
Z: I disagree. Statistics for the past 40 years show that there is no significant relationship between the prevailing level of employment and political gains or losses by the party that happens to be in the majority at election time.

W and Z do not talk about the same thing: W cites the rise of the level of unemployment, but Z replies by citing the level of employment overall.
W cites a trend, W cites an overall number not related to a rise/fall of the level itself => they are talking about two different things.

D. Z's statistics focus on level of unemployment, rather than direction of change
is correct

Hi,
What does "direction of change mean" ?

hi,

actually it means:
Z's statistics focus on level of unemployment, rather than direction of change in unemployment.
W==>He is focussing on rapid RISE (CHANGE ) in employment.
Z==>He is focussing on on current level of unemployment and not the CHANGE (RISE)IN EMPLOYMENT.

hope it helps

Hi,
Sorry I didn't get you.
Isn't W - talking about unemployment.
VP
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1123
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 169

Kudos [?]: 1697 [0], given: 219

Re: rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2013, 08:17
cumulonimbus wrote:
Hi,
Sorry I didn't get you.
Isn't W - talking about unemployment.

Nope, they use similar words, but what they say is very different.

W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economic problem; it will undoubtedly cost the majority party votes in the coming elections.
Z: I disagree. Statistics for the past 40 years show that there is no significant relationship between the prevailing level of employment and political gains or losses by the party that happens to be in the majority at election time.

W talks about the rise like: +4%
Z talks about the number like: 90%

The first cites a TREND (+ something ), the second cites a "steady" number.
Hope it's clear
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Director
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 842
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Followers: 50

Kudos [?]: 1009 [1] , given: 197

Re: rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious economi [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2013, 08:25
1
KUDOS
cumulonimbus wrote:

Hi,
Sorry I didn't get you.
Isn't W - talking about unemployment.

my bad ...that was a typo.

let me elaborate again.
first of all we must know employment rate unemployment are complementary.
means you can say either : employment is increasing or unemplyment is decreasing
and employment is decreasing or unemployment is increasing.

so now argument:
hi,

actually it means:
Z's statistics focus on level of unemployment, rather than direction of change in unemployment.
or you can rephrase this==>Z's statistics focus on level of employment, rather than direction of change in employment.

W==>He is focussing on rapid RISE (CHANGE ) in unemployment.
Z==>He is focussing on current level of unemployment and not the CHANGE IN UNEMPLOYMENT.
OR YOU CAN REPHRASE IT AS
He is focussing on current level of employment and not the CHANGE IN EMPLOYMENT

hope it helps
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...

learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... assessment

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7620
Followers: 709

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 0

Re: W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2015, 07:11
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: W: the rapid rise in the rate of unemployment is a serious   [#permalink] 02 Oct 2015, 07:11
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The rate of unemployment in Country X is higher than is the rate of 1 01 Oct 2015, 12:24
Veritas - In response to a high unemployment rate and to... 0 05 Aug 2014, 11:08
6 In response to a high unemployment rate and to complaints 11 20 Oct 2013, 00:50
1 Q: The rapid rise in the rate of home foreclosures is a 6 28 Oct 2010, 02:01
1 The unemployment rate in the United States fell from 7.5 9 19 Aug 2009, 14:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by