2 mins 27 sec .. couldn't get it.
Have never seen an RC with only a single question before, interesting.
Summary:
Talks a bunch about TS Elliot's letters - are they as good as everyone projects them. How were they written? Who all were a part of the correspondence and along with another writer Thomas McGreevy's creation they are in contention to be essential reading for anyone with an interest in modern writing.
This is a detail question with a not so direct reference in the passage - we need to be able to spot the scrupulously courteous and relate it back to being formal in a very detailed way. A long shot for anyone in a hurry to solve the question.What aspect of Eliot’s letter writing does the author specifically address?
A. Their formality
Bingo - this is the direct translation of the above words and hence the right answerB. Their multifacetedness
Could be true since they form an essential read for anyone interested in writing but not as direct as (A)C. Their expansive scope
TRAP one might think that since there is a correspondence with such long list of well-established writers that the scope of the letters could be expansive, however, this is not the case. Since the author does not specifically address this, this option is incorrect. As the question is asking for a specific address by the author. Very smart.D. Their renown
TRAP for the same reasons as mentioned aboveE.Their superficiality
WRONG - irrelevant and out of scope.Tough options for the single question passage.
Regards,
Gladi
_________________
Regards,
Gladi
“Do. Or do not. There is no try.” - Yoda (The Empire Strikes Back)