Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 15:33

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

We have heard a good deal in recent years about the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 503
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

We have heard a good deal in recent years about the [#permalink] New post 07 Nov 2005, 18:50
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
We have heard a good deal in recent years about the declining importance of the two major political parties. It is the mass media, we are told, that decide the outcome of elections, not the power of the parties. But it is worth noting that no independent or third-party candidate has won any important election in recent years, and in the last nationwide campaign, the two major parties raised and spent more money than ever before in support of their candidates and platforms. It seems clear that reports of the imminent demise of the two-party system are premature at best.

Which of the following is an assumption made in the argument above?
(A) The amount of money raised and spent by a political party is one valid criterion for judging the influence of the party.
(B) A significant increase in the number of third-party candidates would be evidence of a decline in the importance of the two major parties.
(C) The two-party system has contributed significantly to the stability of the American political structure.
(D) The mass media tend to favor an independent or third-party candidate over a candidate from one of the two major parties.
(E) The mass media are relatively unimportant in deciding the outcome of most elections.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 587
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

[#permalink] New post 07 Nov 2005, 19:56
Looks like A.
What is the OA
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1898
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 110 [0], given: 0

Re: CR # Major Political Parties. [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2005, 03:16
vc019 wrote:
We have heard a good deal in recent years about the declining importance of the two major political parties. It is the mass media, we are told, that decide the outcome of elections, not the power of the parties. But it is worth noting that no independent or third-party candidate has won any important election in recent years, and in the last nationwide campaign, the two major parties raised and spent more money than ever before in support of their candidates and platforms. It seems clear that reports of the imminent demise of the two-party system are premature at best.

Which of the following is an assumption made in the argument above?
(A) The amount of money raised and spent by a political party is one valid criterion for judging the influence of the party.
(B) A significant increase in the number of third-party candidates would be evidence of a decline in the importance of the two major parties.
(C) The two-party system has contributed significantly to the stability of the American political structure.
(D) The mass media tend to favor an independent or third-party candidate over a candidate from one of the two major parties.
(E) The mass media are relatively unimportant in deciding the outcome of most elections.


The conclusion that "It seems clear that reports of the imminent demise of the two-party system are premature at best." based firstly on the fact that "the two major parties raised and spent more money than ever before in support of their candidates and platforms". There's a hidden assumption here, in other words, a logic gap. Only A fills this gap by stating how important money is in the outcome of an election.
A it is.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1743
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2005, 04:13
Let's see

We have 2 Premises here

1. no independent or third-party candidate has won any important election in recent years

2. the two major parties raised and spent more money than ever before in support of their candidates and platforms


The conclusion is

reports of the imminent demise of the two-party system are premature at best

From the Premise the conclusion has been drwan based on hidden assumption that fill the logical gap.

A. fills the logical Gapl
B. it can be another conclusion
C. out of scope.
D. personal attack
E. out of scope.

So A is the answer
_________________

hey ya......

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 233
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2005, 11:28
God...at least found something where I choose what others choose too...go A go...but why not B?? Hmm...
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1816
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2005, 11:49
Between A and B, A looks like an assumption.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1128
Location: CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2005, 13:55
D is better in this case, to me.

argument:
It is the mass media, we are told, that decide the outcome of elections, not the power of the parties. But it is worth noting that no independent or third-party candidate has won any important election in recent years, and in the last nationwide campaign, the two major parties raised and spent more money than ever before in support of their candidates and platforms.

The general belief:
The outcome of election is determined by:
(a) mass media
(b) not by power of the parties

In reality:
(a) no independent or 3rd party candidate has won
(b) major parties raised and spent more money


here, (a) is contradicted with (a) and same for b.

ans choice (A) says major parties raised and spent more money
-> influence of the party

it should have been better if it said:
-> power of the party

D negates relationship between two (a)'s above.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1743
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2005, 12:13
OA please
_________________

hey ya......

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Posts: 209
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2005, 06:19
Between A and D, I pick A

That the mass media tend to favor an independent or third-party candidate over a candidate from one of the two major parties does not mean that the mass media will help the third-party candidate win the election. So if we negate D, the argument is still valid.
  [#permalink] 11 Nov 2005, 06:19
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 We have heard a good deal in recent years about the abhinav24 20 23 Oct 2008, 22:53
We have heard a good deal in recent years about the marcodonzelli 4 29 Jan 2008, 05:26
We have heard a good deal in recent years about the AK47 6 17 Jan 2007, 17:23
We have heard a good deal in recent years about the itishaj 2 28 Mar 2006, 07:27
We have heard a good deal in recent years about the vivek123 3 20 Feb 2006, 06:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by

We have heard a good deal in recent years about the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.