Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 04:02

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Weakening questions vs Flaw in the reasoning question

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1551
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 231 [0], given: 1

Weakening questions vs Flaw in the reasoning question [#permalink] New post 06 Jun 2009, 07:00
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
ok guys, I am reading the critical reasoning bible on page 214 where the flaw in the reasoning question is discussed. The following are the given examples of how the questions for flaw in the reasoning can be asked:

a) "Which of the following most accurately dexcribes a flaw in the argument's reasoning?"
b) "The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticisms on the grounds that the argument"
c) "The reasoning above is flawed because it fails to recognize that"
d) "A questionable aspect of the above is that it"


Now, after looking at such questions, I start to wonder how can one differentiate between the flaw in the reasoning question and the weakening question? The flaw in the reasoning question usually looks for answer choice that indicates a flaw in the overal logic of the argument. However, if someone misinterprets the question, he or she can end up choosing an answer that would rather weaken the argument. Any suggestions??
thanks!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 57
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 1

Re: Weakening questions vs Flaw in the reasoning question [#permalink] New post 06 Jun 2009, 07:17
Here do I describe in formula:

Flaw is insufficient premise (it's other premise), it support for other premise so that have conclusion.
Flaw + premise = conclusion
Weaken assumption is close to assumption:
Origin: Premise 1 + presmise 2 = Conclusion
Weaken: Premise 2 + premise 3 = Conclusion.

Hope you understand it!
_________________

Remember to give kudos if it's useful for you !!!

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 May 2011
Posts: 30
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Weakening questions vs Flaw in the reasoning question [#permalink] New post 16 Jan 2012, 17:57
mrbgam.. could you please elaborate on this?Possibly wth an example?
Re: Weakening questions vs Flaw in the reasoning question   [#permalink] 16 Jan 2012, 17:57
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Critical Reasoning Weaken question Amateur 0 26 Nov 2013, 12:15
8 GMAT Critical Reasoning: Weaken Questions avohden 0 01 Nov 2013, 11:36
Experts publish their posts in the topic Rare Question Type: Similar Flawed Pattern of Reasoning grant1377 1 25 Aug 2013, 10:04
strategy for flaw in reasoning questions adhithya 0 07 May 2011, 22:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Weakening questions vs Flaw in the reasoning question

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.