Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 17 Sep 2014, 23:50

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Were it not for the fusion-powered heat and radiation that

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Mar 2010
Posts: 191
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 9

GMAT Tests User
Were it not for the fusion-powered heat and radiation that [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2010, 07:09
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

90% (01:19) correct 10% (01:38) wrong based on 39 sessions
Were it not for the fusion-powered heat and radiation that rush from its core, instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse.
A. instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse
B. instead a star would have collapsed under its own weight
C. a star would have to be collapsing under its own weight
D. a star would collapse under its own weight
E. its own weight would have caused a star’s collapse

I dont have OA.
Please justify your answer.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 807
Location: London
Followers: 76

Kudos [?]: 480 [0], given: 25

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: Please explain. [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2010, 07:34
The use of instead seems wrong here. Ruling out A & B

C : "would have to be collapsing" is incorrect

D : straight forward and concise

E : The statement is wordy, also "its" cannot relate to star as star is in a possessive form "star's collpase" and not "star"
_________________

Math write-ups
1) Algebra-101 2) Sequences 3) Set combinatorics 4) 3-D geometry

My GMAT story

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 116
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 1

Re: Please explain. [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2010, 08:57
Were it not for the fusion-powered heat and radiation that rush from its core, instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse.
A. instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse
B. instead a star would have collapsed under its own weight
C. a star would have to be collapsing under its own weight
D. a star would collapse under its own weight
E. its own weight would have caused a star’s collapse

This is a form of if construction and sets up a hypothetical condition. This construction requires would.

If I were rich I would donate money to charity.

This leaves us with options C&D. would have to be is wrong construction.

Correct option D
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 73
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Re: Please explain. [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2010, 09:04
IMO E.

Since "were it not.." starts the sentence, use of instead will be redundant. Hence, Option A and B are out.
Now, to make the sentence parallel, we have to start the second part we have to use "its own weight..".

Hence, I would go with E.
_________________

-------------------------------------
Please give kudos, if my post is helpful.

For English Grammar tips, consider visiting http://www.grammar-quizzes.com/index.html.

Current Student
User avatar
Status: What's your raashee?
Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Posts: 1847
Location: United States (NC)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: UNC (Kenan-Flagler) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 201 [0], given: 52

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: Please explain. [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2010, 10:44
2:3 split. the subject is the star so it should be followed. C sounds weird and doesnt make much sense. D
_________________

If you like my answers please +1 kudos!

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 459
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 5

GMAT Tests User
Re: Please explain. [#permalink] New post 20 Sep 2010, 06:21
D, straight forward, nothing else makes sense
_________________

GGG (Gym / GMAT / Girl) -- Be Serious

Its your duty to post OA afterwards; some one must be waiting for that...

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Posts: 121
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: Please explain. [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2011, 06:15
"its core" modifies the star.. and hence down to C and D..
D is uncomplicated and conveys the meaning straight!
Re: Please explain.   [#permalink] 26 Jul 2011, 06:15
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Heating-oil prices metallicafan 2 17 Nov 2011, 13:51
2 Heating-oil prices cici 8 29 Jun 2009, 23:49
Most of the ultraviolet radiation reaching the Earths bhatiagp 5 29 Apr 2008, 00:20
Were it not for the fusion-powered heat and radiation that jerrywu 2 21 Aug 2006, 22:56
Were it not for fusion-powered heast and radiation that rush kok72 3 29 Sep 2004, 01:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Were it not for the fusion-powered heat and radiation that

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.