cano wrote:
jk12 wrote:
The essays give no space for leadership accomplishments (except for one such experience in innovation essay). Makes me wonder whether Wharton cares about them (despite claims to contrary on their website)! Furthermore, they seem to have cut down total essay length by 700 words this year with respect to last year (one essay choice removed).
I'll appreciate any insights from current and prospective students.
Not my insights, but have you checked PaulLanzillotti's analysis of the essays? Check out this thread:
breaking-down-the-2012-wharton-essays-117238.htmlPaul Lanzilotti analysis is tangential to my original query. Paul Lanzi has analyzed the essays with the assumption that the whole set of essays should answer the question of what, why, how, when and where. According to his analysis, one could adopt an approach of answering what/how/when in the professional objectives question, and, why/where in question 1,2, and 3.
My query asks a different question - where and how should one distribute the leadership accomplishments in the application. Accomplishments of the type, i used x and y to bring in z revenues, for example. Since they dont exclusively dedicate space for it, one could assume that they expect applicant to use the given essay questions to weave in such examples. Even if one tries to weave such an example, it needs to be rather short (since essays ask a different question).
Nonetheless, it is quite a different experience than hbs questions where they ask three accomplishments, straight up.