Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

oh, okay. i had thought that with rectangles, their corners were always 90 degrees. I guess we cant assume that because of shapes like rhombuses, etc ?

edit: wait a sec, if the corners arent 90 degrees, then why can we use pythagorean theorem and say that ^2+b^2 = 5 ?

oh, okay. i had thought that with rectangles, their corners were always 90 degrees. I guess we cant assume that because of shapes like rhombuses, etc ?

edit: wait a sec, if the corners arent 90 degrees, then why can we use pythagorean theorem and say that ^2+b^2 = 5 ?

The angles of a rectangle are ALWAYS 90 degrees.

But if the hypo is 5, its not necessary that the other two sides will always be 3 and 4.

Your option cannot form a triangle and second option makes the parallelogram a Square (questions says Rectangular region). So neither of them is sufficient enough to justify your answer.
_________________

Your option cannot form a triangle and second option makes the parallelogram a Square (questions says Rectangular region). So neither of them is sufficient enough to justify your answer.

I meant to say; any combination of two positive numbers whose squares add up to 25 i.e. 5^2 will form a triangle with hypotenuse 5.

one side: \(2\sqrt{6}\) and other side: \(1\); hypotenuse: \(5\)

\(1^2+(2\sqrt{6})^2=5^2\)

And a square is a specialized rectangle in GMAT.
_________________

Your option cannot form a triangle and second option makes the parallelogram a Square (questions says Rectangular region). So neither of them is sufficient enough to justify your answer.

I meant to say; any combination of two positive numbers whose squares add up to 25 i.e. 5^2 will form a triangle with hypotenuse 5.

one side: \(2\sqrt{6}\) and other side: \(1\); hypotenuse: \(5\)

\(1^2+(2\sqrt{6})^2=5^2\)

And a square is a specialized rectangle in GMAT.

Hi , Your statement "any combination of two positive numbers whose squares add up to 25 i.e. 5^2 will form a triangle with hypotenuse 5. " is not true if its a right angle traingle with diagonal as 5. as per Pythagoras theorem other 2 sides should be 3 and 4 so A is sufficient alone Pl clarify incase I am missing anything

Your option cannot form a triangle and second option makes the parallelogram a Square (questions says Rectangular region). So neither of them is sufficient enough to justify your answer.

I meant to say; any combination of two positive numbers whose squares add up to 25 i.e. 5^2 will form a triangle with hypotenuse 5.

one side: \(2\sqrt{6}\) and other side: \(1\); hypotenuse: \(5\)

\(1^2+(2\sqrt{6})^2=5^2\)

And a square is a specialized rectangle in GMAT.

Hi , Your statement "any combination of two positive numbers whose squares add up to 25 i.e. 5^2 will form a triangle with hypotenuse 5. " is not true if its a right angle traingle with diagonal as 5. as per Pythagoras theorem other 2 sides should be 3 and 4 so A is sufficient alone Pl clarify incase I am missing anything

Pythagoras theorem says .. Hyp^2 = sum of the squares of other 2 sides.. it never said the all the sides are phythagoras triplets like 3,4,5 and 9,12,15 so if the hyp = 5, yes its easier to assume that other 2 sides follow the triplet format and are 3 and 4 but nothing stops us from assuming that they can be 1 and 2 sqrt 6.

Your option cannot form a triangle and second option makes the parallelogram a Square (questions says Rectangular region). So neither of them is sufficient enough to justify your answer.

I meant to say; any combination of two positive numbers whose squares add up to 25 i.e. 5^2 will form a triangle with hypotenuse 5.

one side: \(2\sqrt{6}\) and other side: \(1\); hypotenuse: \(5\)

\(1^2+(2\sqrt{6})^2=5^2\)

And a square is a specialized rectangle in GMAT.

Hi , Your statement "any combination of two positive numbers whose squares add up to 25 i.e. 5^2 will form a triangle with hypotenuse 5. " is not true if its a right angle traingle with diagonal as 5. as per Pythagoras theorem other 2 sides should be 3 and 4 so A is sufficient alone Pl clarify incase I am missing anything

3,4,5 is just one of the infinite possibilities.

Why don't you draw it and see it yourself.

Draw a horizontal line-segment(AB) of 1 unit . Draw a perpendicular ray directly upward from point A. Now, using divider pointing at point B, and setting the divider to 5 units, make a small arc so that it cuts the ray at some point, say C. Join BC. You now have a right triangle with hypotenuse 5, one side 1 unit, and another side \(\sqrt{5^2-1} = \sqrt{24}= 2 \sqrt{6} \approx 4.9\)

Like this, we have infinite possibilities because there are infinite real numbers between 0 and 5, exclusive.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...