Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Your reasoning is flawless IMO
possible sets
3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13
11,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1
The average for first 9 terms for both is 7 so A) is insufficient and as you mentioned B) is also insufficient by the same reasoning.
Then from both statements togehter seems that only one set of numbers can be determined.
Good reasoning Ihotseface

My expln: (Assuming increasing order)
stmt 1: Since the nos are consecutive 7 is the 5th element. For 11 numbers, the average should be the 6th number. That is 8.

I concurr with RAO ... the defination of CONSECUTIVE INTEGER is the integers that follows in sequence,each number being one greater than the previous number ,represented by n,n+1,n+2 .....where n is any number ...