Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

s2 is also sufficient. you have 2 sides of the triangle and the area area = \frac{1}{2}* bc SinA

30 = \frac{1}{2} * 5 * 13 SinA

=> Sin A = 12/13 => A must be 90 degree but those who are still not sure..check the cosine rule.

cos A = \frac{5}{13} using cos^2 A = 1- sin^2 A

cos A =\frac{(b^2 + c^2 - a^2)}{2bc}

This will solve for a => \frac{5}{13} = \frac{(25 + 169 -a^2)}{2*5*13} => 50 = 25 + 169 - a^2 ==> a^2 = 144 thus a = 12

Answer is A. To apply cosine rule or sine rule we need to know A angle. cos A is not 5/13 or sin A is not 12/13 as the question statement does not tell that triangle has one right angle, its only given by statement 1.

First of all I want to say that trigonometry is not tested in GMAT. You should be able to solve all GMAT geometry problems without it.

Now statement (1) is clearly sufficient as shown in previous posts.

As for statement (2): consider BA to be the base. Area=30=\frac{1}{2}*base*height. If angle B is right angle, then height=CB=12BUT if angle B is acute and CA is reflected symmetricly about vertical line, then CA still will be 13, height still will be the same and area still will be 30, though in this case CB will be much greater than 12.

First of all I want to say that trigonometry is not tested in GMAT. You should be able to solve all GMAT geometry problems without it.

Now statement (1) is clearly sufficient as shown in previous posts.

As for statement (2): consider BA to be the base. Area=30=\frac{1}{2}*base*height. If angle B is right angle, then height=CB=12BUT if angle B is acute and CA is reflected symmetricly about vertical line, then CA still will be 13, height still will be the same and area still will be 30, though in this case CB will be much greater than 12.

So statement (2) is not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Could you please let me know where my explanation is wrong? coz m not able to judge it. _________________

First of all I want to say that trigonometry is not tested in GMAT. You should be able to solve all GMAT geometry problems without it.

Now statement (1) is clearly sufficient as shown in previous posts.

As for statement (2): consider BA to be the base. Area=30=\frac{1}{2}*base*height. If angle B is right angle, then height=CB=12BUT if angle B is acute and CA is reflected symmetricly about vertical line, then CA still will be 13, height still will be the same and area still will be 30, though in this case CB will be much greater than 12.

So statement (2) is not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Area = 30 units 1/2*base *height going by your explanation: Area is same, height same => base has to be same. We cannot form two triangles with two sides the same, same height and area yet the third side different. If one side is13 units, base is 5 units and area of triangle is 30 units, the third side has to be 12 units, perpendicular to the base. IMO D

First of all I want to say that trigonometry is not tested in GMAT. You should be able to solve all GMAT geometry problems without it.

Now statement (1) is clearly sufficient as shown in previous posts.

As for statement (2): consider BA to be the base. Area=30=\frac{1}{2}*base*height. If angle B is right angle, then height=CB=12BUT if angle B is acute and CA is reflected symmetricly about vertical line, then CA still will be 13, height still will be the same and area still will be 30, though in this case CB will be much greater than 12.

So statement (2) is not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Could you please let me know where my explanation is wrong? coz m not able to judge it.

The formula you posted is correct: Area=\frac{1}{2}BA*CA*sinA --> sinA=\frac{12}{13}, but from this we cannot calculate angle A, as sin A=Sin (180-A). Meaning that this won't give us ONLY one value for angle A, thus we won't have ONLY one value for CB --> A can be acute angle, making B right angle AND making CB equal to 12 OR A can be obtuse angle, making B acute angle AND making CB greater then 12.

First of all I want to say that trigonometry is not tested in GMAT. You should be able to solve all GMAT geometry problems without it.

Now statement (1) is clearly sufficient as shown in previous posts.

As for statement (2): consider BA to be the base. Area=30=\frac{1}{2}*base*height. If angle B is right angle, then height=CB=12BUT if angle B is acute and CA is reflected symmetricly about vertical line, then CA still will be 13, height still will be the same and area still will be 30, though in this case CB will be much greater than 12.

So statement (2) is not sufficient.

Answer: A.

That is why I found that question to be somewhat over complicated for sub-600 level as you have to consider two different scenarios....

First of all I want to say that trigonometry is not tested in GMAT. You should be able to solve all GMAT geometry problems without it.

Now statement (1) is clearly sufficient as shown in previous posts.

As for statement (2): consider BA to be the base. Area=30=\frac{1}{2}*base*height. If angle B is right angle, then height=CB=12BUT if angle B is acute and CA is reflected symmetricly about vertical line, then CA still will be 13, height still will be the same and area still will be 30, though in this case CB will be much greater than 12.

So statement (2) is not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Area = 30 units 1/2*base *height going by your explanation: Area is same, height same => base has to be same. We cannot form two triangles with two sides the same, same height and area yet the third side different. If one side is13 units, base is 5 units and area of triangle is 30 units, the third side has to be 12 units, perpendicular to the base. IMO D

We can form two different triangles with same base, same height, same second side and same area.

First of all I want to say that trigonometry is not tested in GMAT. You should be able to solve all GMAT geometry problems without it.

Now statement (1) is clearly sufficient as shown in previous posts.

As for statement (2): consider BA to be the base. Area=30=\frac{1}{2}*base*height. If angle B is right angle, then height=CB=12BUT if angle B is acute and CA is reflected symmetricly about vertical line, then CA still will be 13, height still will be the same and area still will be 30, though in this case CB will be much greater than 12.

So statement (2) is not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Area = 30 units 1/2*base *height going by your explanation: Area is same, height same => base has to be same. We cannot form two triangles with two sides the same, same height and area yet the third side different. If one side is13 units, base is 5 units and area of triangle is 30 units, the third side has to be 12 units, perpendicular to the base. IMO D

We can form two different triangles with same base, same height, same second side and same area.

I found this drawing in the web:

Attachment:

Triangles.jpg

Hope it helps.[/quote

Hello Bunuel,

I think the answer to this question should be D. Because if you have the area of the Triangle, and two sides you can use Heron's formula to figure out the third side

A = \sqrt{S(S-a)(S-b)(S-c)} Where A = Area of Triangle S = (a+b+c)/2 a,b,c are the sides of the triangle.

So for us in the above formula all we are missing is the value of c.

Let me know if you think I made some silly assumption in this solution _________________

I think the answer to this question should be D. Because if you have the area of the Triangle, and two sides you can use Heron's formula to figure out the third side

A = \sqrt{S(S-a)(S-b)(S-c)} Where A = Area of Triangle S = (a+b+c)/2 a,b,c are the sides of the triangle.

So for us in the above formula all we are missing is the value of c.

Let me know if you think I made some silly assumption in this solution

The problem with your approach is that you'll have more than one solution for c. So statement 2 is not sufficient. _________________

I am not sure about this one. I believe that using the second equation too you can find the area of the triangle. Using the formula sqrt(s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)). You have 1 equation and 1 variable. Well it might be a tough 4th degree equation but I am hoping it does not give me 2 positive roots.

I am not sure about this one. I believe that using the second equation too you can find the area of the triangle. Using the formula sqrt(s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)). You have 1 equation and 1 variable. Well it might be a tough 4th degree equation but I am hoping it does not give me 2 positive roots.

Bunuel, Shrouded?

Let me know what I am missing.

Thank you.

As you can see in the diagrams in the discussion, (2) can lead to more than one triangle.

The problem in arguing the way you did is exactly as you pointed out. You get an equation in the fourth degree which can have upto four roots, and there is no easy way to know and conclude how many of these solutions will be positive numbers and hence define valid triangles. Uniqueness of solution is not easy to guarantee. _________________

Re: What is the length of segment BC? [#permalink]
22 Jun 2013, 03:18

Hi Bunnel,

Regarding B: I think it is sufficient to find y my approach: Drop a perpendicular from AD to opposite side - this will divide the side into x and 13-x

1/2xh+1/2(13-x)h=30 13/2h=30 =>h=60/13 so x can be found out as =>x=(25-h^2)^(1/2) therefore 13-x could be found out. and therefore y could be found out.

Hence answer should be D. Please correct me if I am wrong.

I couldn’t help myself but stay impressed. young leader who can now basically speak Chinese and handle things alone (I’m Korean Canadian by the way, so...