Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

the 10x12x16 rectangular box fits for 24 4x4x4 cubs.

Dimensions of the rectangular box are not all perfectly divisible by 4(cube Dimensions) so there must be an empty part in the box, since 10 is not divisible by 4.
==> Therefore we pretend that the box rectangle is 8x12x16, with a total area of 1536. ===>1536/64=24

assuming that the base of th recatngle = 12*16 = 192

the maximum one level cubes = 12 ie: (192/16)

hight = 10 ( 4*2+2) so it can take two levels of the cubes = 12*2 = 24

assuming base of rectangle = 16*10 = 160

the maximum one level cubes = 160/16 = 10

hight is 12 = 4*3 so it can take three levels of cubes with hight 4

maximum number of cubes = 30

my answer is 30

Here in second case we can not have more than 8 cubes in each row.
You can only 4 along the length i.e16 and 2 along the width that is 10.
Thus no will be 8. So max will be 24.
Please correct me if I am wrong.

Re: What is the maximum number of 4X4X4 cubes that can fit in a [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Oct 2013, 02:39

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

Re: What is the maximum number of 4x4x4 cubes that can fit in a [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Mar 2014, 15:08

honchos wrote:

Bunuel, I still believe that this Could some how be solved by LCM and HCF logic.

Can you Please Help?

That honestly seems like overkill. Just picture a box. You'd try to fill it as efficiently as you could. So you'd start packing on the 12x16 side, so 3x4 = 12 boxes. How many stacks of 12? 10/4 = 2.5, so there are 2 full stacks. 12x2 = 24.

12 x 16 x 10 --> 3*4*2 = 24 is the fastest way to do this problem.

Re: What is the maximum number of 4x4x4 cubes that can fit in a [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Mar 2014, 22:49

honchos wrote:

CCMBA wrote:

honchos wrote:

Bunuel, I still believe that this Could some how be solved by LCM and HCF logic.

Can you Please Help?

That honestly seems like overkill. Just picture a box. You'd try to fill it as efficiently as you could. So you'd start packing on the 12x16 side, so 3x4 = 12 boxes. How many stacks of 12? 10/4 = 2.5, so there are 2 full stacks. 12x2 = 24.

12 x 16 x 10 --> 3*4*2 = 24 is the fastest way to do this problem.

Go and sit in actual exam, exam will tell you what honestly kills any one. Better and time saving approach's are thumbs up in the real Examination.

Your answer doesn't make sense, Just a rat race marathon. Every can and has solved it by that method.

But this question can certainly be solve through LCM/HCF.

This is not a "rat race marathon" as you suggest. I'm pretty sure you're the one who's trying to look for a harder, more time-consuming solution. My visual was meant to concretize the problem, which you seemed to have trouble understanding. When I did this, I used the exact approach many are advocating: Divide each dimension by 4. Multiply the integer parts of the quotient.

So 12/4 * 16/4 * 10/4 becomes 3*4*2. I did this in 30 seconds. On my paper, I had 7 numbers written down: first row (12, 16, 10), second row (3, 4, 2, 24). Just because someone takes the time to explain her logic does not mean she doesn't understand how to get the answer. I think about how to do the problem. There was really no need to insult me. If you cannot tell this is the exact same method others have proposed, it speaks to an inability to recognize and apply concepts when they are presented to you in a novel format. That appears to be your problem.

Re: What is the maximum number of 4x4x4 cubes that can fit in a [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Mar 2014, 23:04

1

This post received KUDOS

honchos wrote:

PareshGmat wrote:

\(\frac{(10 * 12 * 16)}{(4 * 4 * 4)}\)

\(\frac{12}{4} = 3\)

\(\frac{16}{4} = 4\)

\(\frac{10}{4} = 2\) max (We cant do a decimal calculation here; cannot adjust dimensions of the boxes; so max quotient is 2)

Answer = 4 x 2 x 3 = 24 = D

Yes that is a far better approach, I think you have used that LCM/HCF concept, Isn't it.

Do you remember the relationship between HCF/LCM

Thanks for your reply.

Not used HCF/LCM. Cant recall the relation

In this type of question, the learning lesson for me is that we cannot "adjust" the dimensions given. So 10/4 max can yield 2 as quotient; cannot "borrow" from the adjacent nos. at make it a perfect division.

Re: What is the maximum number of 4x4x4 cubes that can fit in a [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Mar 2014, 23:07

CCMBA,

What you are trying to preach me even I could solve by that method or rather any one who is preparing for GMAT can solve by this method.

But GMAT is far beyond you comprehension as rumor mongers always rumor's that quantitative questions are quite easy.

I have given the GMAT and scored 710. Q50 V36

As soon as you keep on doing all the questions correctly the difficulty level continue to rise and one questions pops up, which were even far difficult then CAT one's. One question, I will not post it as it against policy, could be solved only by the use of Binomial theorem.

You are continuously arguing for a method , which was already discussed on this threads and ON many threads before. There seems no logic you are TRYING TO PREACH ME THE the same method what was discussed before in the thread.

My idea of posting is to enrich the Post not to clutter it with the same methods, which are already in place.

Neither do I post just for the sake of posting.

All those who believes GMAT quant is easy, make sure that GMAT writers are smartest people on earth and they will check down to bottom before the give you Q51.

Life is like Boomerang you send insult, it will come back to you as an insult. you TRIED TO PLAY OVER-SMART BY THESE WORDS- That honestly seems like overkill.

If you are too possessive in your comfort Zone and do not want to diversify the learning process, it seems you are infatuated with your frog well.

I simply requested Bunuel to intervene, instead you did, infact you can, But you just repeat the same method, which every one on thos Forum Knows and initiated a insulting and sarcastic language- That honestly seems like overkill.

If you cant handle sarcasm, better you should drop it application on others. _________________

Like my post Send me a Kudos It is a Good manner. My Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-score-750-and-750-i-moved-from-710-to-189016.html

Re: What is the maximum number of 4x4x4 cubes that can fit in a [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Mar 2014, 23:11

PareshGmat wrote:

honchos wrote:

PareshGmat wrote:

\(\frac{(10 * 12 * 16)}{(4 * 4 * 4)}\)

\(\frac{12}{4} = 3\)

\(\frac{16}{4} = 4\)

\(\frac{10}{4} = 2\) max (We cant do a decimal calculation here; cannot adjust dimensions of the boxes; so max quotient is 2)

Answer = 4 x 2 x 3 = 24 = D

Yes that is a far better approach, I think you have used that LCM/HCF concept, Isn't it.

Do you remember the relationship between HCF/LCM

Thanks for your reply.

Not used HCF/LCM. Cant recall the relation

In this type of question, the learning lesson for me is that we cannot "adjust" the dimensions given. So 10/4 max can yield 2 as quotient; cannot "borrow" from the adjacent nos. at make it a perfect division.

Its a nice problem.

Thanks Paresh, we all know that trick, but my point was to learn some arithmetic approach that may have broad application in other questions also. _________________

Like my post Send me a Kudos It is a Good manner. My Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-score-750-and-750-i-moved-from-710-to-189016.html

Re: What is the maximum number of 4x4x4 cubes that can fit in a [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Mar 2014, 09:56

honchos wrote:

CCMBA,

What you are trying to preach me even I could solve by that method or rather any one who is preparing for GMAT can solve by this method.

But GMAT is far beyond you comprehension as rumor mongers always rumor's that quantitative questions are quite easy.

I have given the GMAT and scored 710. Q50 V36

As soon as you keep on doing all the questions correctly the difficulty level continue to rise and one questions pops up, which were even far difficult then CAT one's. One question, I will not post it as it against policy, could be solved only by the use of Binomial theorem.

You are continuously arguing for a method , which was already discussed on this threads and ON many threads before. There seems no logic you are TRYING TO PREACH ME THE the same method what was discussed before in the thread.

My idea of posting is to enrich the Post not to clutter it with the same methods, which are already in place.

Neither do I post just for the sake of posting.

All those who believes GMAT quant is easy, make sure that GMAT writers are smartest people on earth and they will check down to bottom before the give you Q51.

Life is like Boomerang you send insult, it will come back to you as an insult. you TRIED TO PLAY OVER-SMART BY THESE WORDS- That honestly seems like overkill.

If you are too possessive in your comfort Zone and do not want to diversify the learning process, it seems you are infatuated with your frog well.

I simply requested Bunuel to intervene, instead you did, infact you can, But you just repeat the same method, which every one on thos Forum Knows and initiated a insulting and sarcastic language- That honestly seems like overkill.

If you cant handle sarcasm, better you should drop it application on others.

The GMAT is in part a reasoning test. You have to pick the best method in a giving situation. I only explained why this was the best method. Overkill = too much work. That wasn't meant to be an insult. Your response, however, was deliberately insulting. Both times.

Furthermore, you could simply look up the LCM/HCF method, which no one seems to remember. That way people might have a better idea of how to answer your question. And don't have to risk being attacked while doing it.

Stop being rude.

gmatclubot

Re: What is the maximum number of 4x4x4 cubes that can fit in a
[#permalink]
08 Mar 2014, 09:56

This is the kickoff for my 2016-2017 application season. After a summer of introspect and debate I have decided to relaunch my b-school application journey. Why would anyone want...

Check out this awesome article about Anderson on Poets Quants, http://poetsandquants.com/2015/01/02/uclas-anderson-school-morphs-into-a-friendly-tech-hub/ . Anderson is a great place! Sorry for the lack of updates recently. I...

“Oh! Looks like your passport expires soon” – these were the first words at the airport in London I remember last Friday. Shocked that I might not be...