Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Statement 2: You can not simply use unitary method here. We don't know how much distance the wheel covers in one rotation. For example, say wheel covers 10m in one rotation, so it will take 10 rotations to cover 100m where as if wheel covers 5m in one rotation, it will will take 20 rotations to cover the same distance. Also number of rotation here is not a function of time taken to complete the rotation. Hope it helps. _________________

Ifmypostdida dancein your mind, send methe stepsthrough kudos :)

My MBA journey at http://mbadilemma.wordpress.com/

Re: What is the number of 360 degree rotations that a bicycle [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Jan 2013, 05:24

fozzzy wrote:

How do you solve this one?

The distance is given. The question is asking the number of 360 degree rotations. By 360 degree rotations, it means the number of revolutions. The number of revolutions don't depend on the speed but just the radius. The number of revolutions will be \(1000/2*pi*R\).

Statement 2 just gives the speed, but it doesn't gives the radius. Hence +1A _________________

Re: What is the number of 360 degree rotations that a bicycle [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Jan 2013, 06:37

Marcab wrote:

fozzzy wrote:

How do you solve this one?

The distance is given. The question is asking the number of 360 degree rotations. By 360 degree rotations, it means the number of revolutions. The number of revolutions don't depend on the speed but just the radius. The number of revolutions will be \(1000/2*pi*R\).

Statement 2 just gives the speed, but it doesn't gives the radius. Hence +1A

Is this the general formula to solve this type of problems so I can apply this to PS questions _________________

Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...

Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/

GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-software-analysis-and-what-if-scenarios-146146.html

Re: What is the number of 360-degree rotations that a bicycle [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Jan 2013, 06:41

No its not a formula. Its simple logic. Circumfrence is the total distance that a wheel will cover in one rotation. Since the distance is 1000m, therefore the number of revolutions will be 1000/circumfrence. Hope its clear. _________________

Let me put it this way Distance (m) = Speed (m/s) * Time (s) => (m/s)*s = metres In the explanation that you had put forward, you had used "no of rotations" in place of speed. No of rotations is basically a number. It does not translate into speed.

Re: What is the number of 360-degree rotations that a bicycle [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 May 2014, 01:16

Sumithra Sen wrote:

What is the number of 360-degree rotations that a bicycle wheel made while rolling 100 meters in a straight line without slipping?

(1) The diameter of the bicycle wheel, including the tire, was 0.5 meter. (2) The wheel made twenty 360-degree rotations per minute.

I see how this must be A. But how can you consider the tire to be of negligible thickness when it does not say so in statement 1? Moreover the question does not say anything about the tire. Don't you need to consider its thickness? In which case, it will be E.

What is the number of 360-degree rotations that a bicycle wheel made while rolling 100 meters in a straight line without slipping?

(1) The diameter of the bicycle wheel, including the tire, was 0.5 meter. (2) The wheel made twenty 360-degree rotations per minute.

I see how this must be A. But how can you consider the tire to be of negligible thickness when it does not say so in statement 1? Moreover the question does not say anything about the tire. Don't you need to consider its thickness? In which case, it will be E.

Can someone explain this?

(1) says that "the diameter of the bicycle wheel, including the tire, was 0.5 meter". So, we have the diameter of the whole wheel, we don't need the the thickness of tire.

What is the number of 360-degree rotations that a bicycle wheel made while rolling 100 meters in a straight line without slipping?

1 revolution of a circle = circumference of that circle. So, we basically asked to find the value of 100/(circumference).

(1) The diameter of the bicycle wheel, including the tire, was 0.5 meter. We can get the circumference. Sufficient.

(2) The wheel made twenty 360-degree rotations per minute. We cannot get the circumference. Not sufficient.

What is the number of 360-degree rotations that a bicycle wheel made while rolling 100 meters in a straight line without slipping?

(1) The diameter of the bicycle wheel, including the tire, was 0.5 meter. (2) The wheel made twenty 360-degree rotations per minute.

I see how this must be A. But how can you consider the tire to be of negligible thickness when it does not say so in statement 1? Moreover the question does not say anything about the tire. Don't you need to consider its thickness? In which case, it will be E.

Can someone explain this?

Responding to a pm:

Whatever is the number of rotations made by the outside surface of the wheel, the same will be the number of rotations made by the entire wheel. Imagine inserting a long needle from the tire reaching up to the center of the wheel. Every point in the needle will complete one circle at the same time.

Also, the stmnt tells you that the diameter of the wheel including the tire is 0.5 to clarify properly. Else, in common parlance, wheel pretty much includes the tire as well. _________________

Check out this awesome article about Anderson on Poets Quants, http://poetsandquants.com/2015/01/02/uclas-anderson-school-morphs-into-a-friendly-tech-hub/ . Anderson is a great place! Sorry for the lack of updates recently. I...

As you leave central, bustling Tokyo and head Southwest the scenery gradually changes from urban to farmland. You go through a tunnel and on the other side all semblance...