Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

(1) MN = 16. We only know the length of one side. Not sufficient. (2) NP = 20. We only know the length of one side. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) If MN=MP=16 and NP=20 then the perimeter would be 16+16+20=52 but if MN=16 and NP=MP=20 then the perimeter would be 16+20+20=56. Not sufficient.

Re: What is the perimeter of isosceles triangle MNP? [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Jun 2012, 03:38

1

This post received KUDOS

Bunuel wrote:

cyberjadugar wrote:

Hi,

Perimeter of isosceles triangle MNP?

Using (1), MN = 16, no idea about NP & MP. Insufficient.

Using (2) NP = 20, no idea about MN & MP. Insufficient.

Combining both the statements, MN = 16 & NP = 20 for MNP to be isosceles, the third side MP can be 16 or 20. Insufficient.

Thus, Answer is (E).

Regards,

Just a bit harder question, based on OG#28:

What is the perimeter of isosceles triangle MNP?

(1) MN = 16 (2) NP = 32

What would be the answer in this case?

Hi,

Using (1) & (2) alone we can't get the answer (similar to the explanation above)

Combinig (1) & (2), MN = 16 & NP = 32 Possible sides of triangle (16, 16, 32) & (16, 32, 32), now we know a+b>c (sum of two sides greater than third side) (16, 16, 32) doesn't fulfill this criteria Thus only possible triangle is (16, 32, 32) perimeter = 80

Using (1), MN = 16, no idea about NP & MP. Insufficient.

Using (2) NP = 20, no idea about MN & MP. Insufficient.

Combining both the statements, MN = 16 & NP = 20 for MNP to be isosceles, the third side MP can be 16 or 20. Insufficient.

Thus, Answer is (E).

Regards,

Just a bit harder question, based on OG#28:

What is the perimeter of isosceles triangle MNP?

(1) MN = 16 (2) NP = 32

What would be the answer in this case?

Hi,

Using (1) & (2) alone we can't get the answer (similar to the explanation above)

Combinig (1) & (2), MN = 16 & NP = 32 Possible sides of triangle (16, 16, 32) & (16, 32, 32), now we know a+b>c (sum of two sides greater than third side) (16, 16, 32) doesn't fulfill this criteria Thus only possible triangle is (16, 32, 32) perimeter = 80

Thus, Answer is (C)

Regards,

Correct.

What is the perimeter of isosceles triangle MNP?

(1) MN = 16 (2) NP = 32

MUST KNOW FOR THE GMAT: The length of any side of a triangle must be larger than the positive difference of the other two sides, but smaller than the sum of the other two sides.

When we consider the two statements together we can see that the case of {16, 16, 32} is not possible since the sum of two sides (16 and 16) is not greater then the third side (32), so only the following case is possible: {16, 32, 32}, which gives the perimeter equal to 16+32+32=80.

Re: What is the perimeter of isosceles triangle MNP? [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Jun 2012, 04:15

Higher then 550 for sure. I think 600.

Unless we know the property "The length of any side of a triangle must be larger than the positive difference of the other two sides, but smaller than the sum of the other two sides", we can not answer the question easily.

Stmt 1: We can know the second side but don't know the length of third side. Stmt 2: Same logic as given for stmt 1.

Together the third side can be 16 or it can be 20 also.

(1) MN = 16. We only know the length of one side. Not sufficient. (2) NP = 20. We only know the length of one side. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) If MN=MP=16 and NP=20 then the perimeter would be 16+16+20=52 but if MN=16 and NP=MP=20 then the perimeter would be 16+20+20=56. Not sufficient.

Re: What is the perimeter of isosceles triangle MNP? [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Jul 2012, 06:47

What is the perimeter of isosceles triangle MNP? PERIMETER=MN+NP+MP Not given which sides are equal (1) MN = 16 NP&MP unavailable so insufficient (2) NP = 20 MN&MP unavailable so insufficient from (i)&(ii) Perimeter=MN+NP+MP=16+20+?, we don't know which two sides are equal;insufficient (E)
_________________

" Make more efforts " Press Kudos if you liked my post

Re: What is the perimeter of isosceles triangle MNP? [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Dec 2014, 01:34

Bunuel wrote:

What is the perimeter of isosceles triangle MNP?

(1) MN = 16 (2) NP = 20

Diagnostic Test Question: 28 Page: 25 Difficulty: 550

Hi all,

when reading "What is the perimeter of Isosceles Triangle MNP", how can I be sure that "MNP" stands for the vertices (as it is the case here) and not for the sides? If M, N and P each were sides, the result to the question in my opinion would change to "C", as M*N and N*P would HAVE to account for 4*4 and 4*5 in this logic as we're dealing with an isosceles and the rule for the sum of two triangle sides doesn't allow any other solution.

How can I identify these variables to be representing vertices instead of sides?

Diagnostic Test Question: 28 Page: 25 Difficulty: 550

Hi all,

when reading "What is the perimeter of Isosceles Triangle MNP", how can I be sure that "MNP" stands for the vertices (as it is the case here) and not for the sides? If M, N and P each were sides, the result to the question in my opinion would change to "C", as M*N and N*P would HAVE to account for 4*4 and 4*5 in this logic as we're dealing with an isosceles and the rule for the sum of two triangle sides doesn't allow any other solution.

How can I identify these variables to be representing vertices instead of sides?

Thanks Christian

You are over-thinking this one. Capital letters refer to vertices.
_________________

Re: What is the perimeter of isosceles triangle MNP? [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Dec 2014, 10:12

Bunuel wrote:

christian1904 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

What is the perimeter of isosceles triangle MNP?

(1) MN = 16 (2) NP = 20

Diagnostic Test Question: 28 Page: 25 Difficulty: 550

Hi all,

when reading "What is the perimeter of Isosceles Triangle MNP", how can I be sure that "MNP" stands for the vertices (as it is the case here) and not for the sides? If M, N and P each were sides, the result to the question in my opinion would change to "C", as M*N and N*P would HAVE to account for 4*4 and 4*5 in this logic as we're dealing with an isosceles and the rule for the sum of two triangle sides doesn't allow any other solution.

How can I identify these variables to be representing vertices instead of sides?

Thanks Christian

You are over-thinking this one. Capital letters refer to vertices.

Would the angle rules of isosceles triangles not apply here? Since we know sides of 16, 20 - would the remaining side not have to be 16 in order to maintain 1:1:\sqrt{2} ???

Re: What is the perimeter of isosceles triangle MNP? [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Mar 2016, 13:32

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...