Don't go for absolute values while solving this one. Number line approach is much more easier. Also apart from these concepts, we can easily conclude that both the options together is not sufficient as none of them tells us any value of x or y. Anyway let's analyze it with number lines.

Statement 1: Implies either x is also equal to zero or x = 2y.

Not sufficient

Statement 2: We have only information that x > y.

Not sufficient

1 & 2 Together: Now either {y < 0 and x = 0} or {y > 0 and x = 2y}

Not sufficient


_________________

Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
http://www.facebook.com/Gurome

No, you cannot draw that conclusion reliably on a real GMAT question. First, the question does, in fact, mention a value, namely zero. It's also quite easy to reword the question so that the information is in fact sufficient, even without mentioning any value of x or y:


If y is positive, what is the value of x?

(1) The distance between x and y on the number line is equal to the distance between y and zero
(2) On the number line, x is to the left of y


There's no mention of any values here besides zero, but the answer is C; using both statements, x must be zero. I'd find this version of the question more interesting (and more GMAT-like) than the version in the original post, since many people will simply pick E rather quickly and move on. Real GMAT DS questions are very often designed to trap the test taker who uses overly simplistic criteria to pick an answer; if you reason that "the question doesn't mention any values so the answer must be E", you'll be picking the wrong answer a lot of the time.
_________________

Nov 2011: After years of development, I am now making my advanced Quant books and high-level problem sets available for sale. Contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com for details.

Private GMAT Tutor based in Toronto

Yes, as I wrote: "It's also quite easy to reword the question...". I added the condition y > 0 to illustrate that one cannot always glance at a question, say 'oh, the question doesn't mention any values so the answer is E' and hope to get the right answer all of the time; that only works some of the time.
_________________

Nov 2011: After years of development, I am now making my advanced Quant books and high-level problem sets available for sale. Contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com for details.

Private GMAT Tutor based in Toronto

hmmm a question. if they never gave us any info about the value of Y - how can we know the value of X?
_________________

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

that is exactly what I am saying... we do not need to think too much... no value of Y so no matter what info they give - you will never be able to know whats the value of X...
_________________

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Good example. Of course many a GMAT question sets traps such as this.
But if its mentioned in the problem that Y is positive, its not exactly same as the original question, where no property of Y is given to us. Right?
_________________

My GMAT debrief: from-620-to-710-my-gmat-journey-114437.html

What is the value of x?

(i) Distance of x from y is the same as y from zero

Let x=0; y=-5
Distance from x to y=5
y to 0 = 5.
Satisfies the condition. Value of x=0

Let x=0; y=5
Distance from x to y=5
y to 0 = 5
Satisfies the condition. Value of x=0

Let x=10; y=5
Distance from x to y = 5
y to 0 = 5
Satisfies the condition. Value of x=10

Let x=-10; y=-5
Distance from x to y = 5
y to 0 = 5
Satisfies the condition. Value of x=-10

We have three different values for x. 0,10,-10; Not sufficient.


(ii) x is to the right of y

Let x=0; y=-5
Distance from x to y=5
y to 0 = 5.
Satisfies the condition that x is to the right of y. Value of x=0

Let x=10; y=5
Distance from x to y = 5
y to 0 = 5
Satisfies the condition that x is to the right of y. Value of x=10

Two values of x. Not sufficient.

Combining both;
Let x=0; y=-5
Distance from x to y=5
y to 0 = 5.
Satisfies both conditions that x is to the right of y and distance between x and y is same as distance between y and 0. Value of x=0

Let x=10; y=5
Distance from x to y = 5
y to 0 = 5
Satisfies both conditions that x is to the right of y and distance between x and y is same as distance between y and 0. Value of x=10

Two values of x. Not sufficient.

When algebra clouds my mind; I temporarily resort to the sample sets for the clarification.

******************

Had we considered the absolute value paradigm;

|x-y| = |y|

This means;
x-y=-y
x=0
OR(a big OR)
x-y=y
x=2y

|y-x| = |y|

This means;
y-x=-y
x=2y
OR(a big OR)
y-x=y
x=0

Choose anyway; we have two different possible values for x for any value of y. x's exact value can't be determined with given conditions.

Ans: "E"
_________________

~fluke

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates