Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

58% (02:31) correct
42% (01:24) wrong based on 115 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

What is the value of y?

(1) 3|x^2 – 4| = y – 2

(2) |3 – y| = 11

I understand that (1) alone is insufficient, but the explanation says that from (1) we can determine that y is greater than or equal to 2. Can someone please explain how this is deduced? Thanks!

I understand that (1) alone is insufficient, but the explanation says that from (1) we can determine that y is greater than or equal to 2. Can someone please explain how this is deduced? Thanks!

*note that in (1) "x2" is meant to be x squared

What is the value of y? (1) 3|x^2 -4| = y - 2 (2) |3 - y| = 11

(1) As we are asked to find the value of \(y\), from this statement we can conclude only that \(y\geq{2}\), as LHS is absolute value which is never negative, hence RHS als can not be negative. Not sufficient.

To elaborate more left hand side is some absolute value, absolute value is always non-negative: \(|some \ expression|\geq{0}\), so RHS is also non-negative --> \(y-2\geq{0}\) --> \(y\geq{2}\)

My question is, that in the Manhattan Gmat guide, they always ask you to find solutions of the absolute value equation, and then PLUG both values in to the original equation. In case if one of those values dont match up, then that solution can be eliminated. If in either of the equations , we would find a value which could not work, then could we safely count that as sufficiency for that statement, or would we have to still assume that both are possible so not sufficient?

My question is, that in the Manhattan Gmat guide, they always ask you to find solutions of the absolute value equation, and then PLUG both values in to the original equation. In case if one of those values dont match up, then that solution can be eliminated. If in either of the equations , we would find a value which could not work, then could we safely count that as sufficiency for that statement, or would we have to still assume that both are possible so not sufficient?

As for your question: in DS questions, when we are asked to determine value of an unknown, statement is sufficient if it gives single numerical value of this unknown. So if you have two solutions for a variable out of which one is not valid for some reason then you are left with only one solution and thus the statement is sufficient (of course if you are asked to find the value of this variable).
_________________

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Post-MBA I became very intrigued by how senior leaders navigated their career progression. It was also at this time that I realized I learned nothing about this during my...