Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 03 Aug 2015, 20:33
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Oct 2010
Posts: 19
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 3

When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce [#permalink] New post 31 Dec 2012, 18:20
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

47% (01:58) correct 53% (01:26) wrong based on 254 sessions
When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce patented technology, the consumer invariably loses. The company that holds the patent can charge exorbitant prices because there is no direct competition. When the patent expires, other companies are free to manufacture the technology and prices fall. Companies should therefore allow other manufacturers to license patented technology.

The argument above presupposes which of the following?

a. Companies cannot find legal ways to produce technology similar to patented technology.
b. Companies have an obligation to act in the best interest of the consumer.
c. Too many patents are granted to companies that are unwilling to share them.
d. The consumer can tell the difference between patented technology and inferior imitations.
e. Consumers care more about price than about quality.

Will provide the OA after some explanations.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by krackgmat on 01 Jan 2013, 12:18, edited 1 time in total.
Expert Post
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Preparing for the another shot...!
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1422
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 150

Kudos [?]: 844 [0], given: 62

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Patented Technology [#permalink] New post 31 Dec 2012, 20:10
Expert's post
krackgmat wrote:
When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce patented technology, the consumer invariably loses. The company that holds the patent can charge exorbitant prices because there is no direct competition. When the patent expires, other companies are free to manufacture the technology and prices fall. Companies should therefore allow other manufacturers to license patented technology.

The argument above presupposes which of the following?

a. Companies cannot find legal ways to produce technology similar to patented technology.
b. Companies have an obligation to act in the best interest of the consumer.
c. Too many patents are granted to companies that are unwilling to share them.
d. The consumer can tell the difference between patented technology and inferior imitations.
e. Consumers care more about price than about quality.

Will provide the OA after some explanations.


Honestly speaking, I felt the problem to be of 620-640ish level.
Anyways, the conclusion is "Companies should therefore allow other manufacturers to license patented technology." On allowing the other manufacturers to license patented technology, the prices will fall and the consumers can easily have an an access on the by-products of the technology. Here the word "should" plays the vital role.
Hence indirectly, it is stated that companies have an obligation to act in the best interest of the consumer.
+1B
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting
www.Univ-Scholarships.com

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2012
Posts: 5
Schools: AGSM '15
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Patented Technology [#permalink] New post 31 Dec 2012, 22:26
krackgmat wrote:
When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce patented technology, the consumer invariably loses. The company that holds the patent can charge exorbitant prices because there is no direct competition. When the patent expires, other companies are free to manufacture the technology and prices fall. Companies should therefore allow other manufacturers to license patented technology.

The argument above presupposes which of the following?

a. Companies cannot find legal ways to produce technology similar to patented technology.
b. Companies have an obligation to act in the best interest of the consumer.
c. Too many patents are granted to companies that are unwilling to share them.
d. The consumer can tell the difference between patented technology and inferior imitations.
e. Consumers care more about price than about quality.

Will provide the OA after some explanations.



IMO A is the best choice.

A) if companies cannot find an alternative to patented technology, then they have no other choice than to license the technology otherwise only the patent holder can use it. This choice fully supports the argument and conclusion.

B doesn't mention whether the obligation to act in the best interest of the consumer relates to the usage of patented technology.

C is irrelevant because the argument isn't about quantity.

D is irrelevant

E is irrelevant
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Jan 2011
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 5

Re: When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2013, 10:28
1
This post received
KUDOS
krackgmat wrote:
When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce patented technology, the consumer invariably loses. The company that holds the patent can charge exorbitant prices because there is no direct competition. When the patent expires, other companies are free to manufacture the technology and prices fall. Companies should therefore allow other manufacturers to license patented technology.

The argument above presupposes which of the following?

a. Companies cannot find legal ways to produce technology similar to patented technology.
b. Companies have an obligation to act in the best interest of the consumer.
c. Too many patents are granted to companies that are unwilling to share them.
d. The consumer can tell the difference between patented technology and inferior imitations.
e. Consumers care more about price than about quality.

Will provide the OA after some explanations.



My take will be Option B.

Conclusion : Companies should allow other manufacturers to license patented technology.

If we suggest a company to allow other manufacturers to license patent despite of the fact that the monopoly of the company from the market will be lost, then the only reason is the Consumers are the ones for which Companies care and are obligated to. Hence the unsaid assumption here is "Companies have an obligation to act in the best interest of the consumer"
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4634
Followers: 495

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce [#permalink] New post 30 May 2015, 23:24
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 May 2015
Posts: 257
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 52

CAT Tests
Re: When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce [#permalink] New post 31 May 2015, 07:23
B
Conclusion - Companies should therefore allow other manufacturers to license patented technology.
Premises - Companies do not allow use of patented products thus customers suffer
Assumption - Company should look into benefits for customers
_________________

Apoorv

I realize that i cannot change the world....But i can play a part :)

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 347
Schools: Cambridge'16
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 33

CAT Tests
Re: When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce [#permalink] New post 03 Jun 2015, 23:22
Premise (interm conclusion):
When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce patented technology, the consumer invariably loses

Conclusion (final):
Companies should therefore allow other manufacturers to license patented technology.

Prethink: If consumer loses the company should

B fits
Re: When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce   [#permalink] 03 Jun 2015, 23:22
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
54 Experts publish their posts in the topic When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce nitya34 52 11 Mar 2009, 02:55
When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce mm007 10 28 Dec 2006, 23:15
When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce karlfurt 18 15 Oct 2006, 10:44
When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce gmatcrook 14 15 Aug 2006, 14:34
With the emergence of private companies producing weapons Praetorian 11 02 Jul 2006, 14:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.