Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 29 Aug 2016, 00:21

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

When a group of people starts a company, the founders

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 152
Location: India
WE: Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 83 [5] , given: 24

When a group of people starts a company, the founders [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Dec 2013, 11:35
5
This post received
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

60% (02:33) correct 40% (01:50) wrong based on 281 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

When a group of people starts a company, the founders usually serve as sources both of funding and of skills in marketing, management, and technical matters. It is unlikely that a single individual can both provide adequate funding and be skilled in marketing, management, and technical matters. Therefore, companies founded by groups are more likely to succeed than companies founded by individuals.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?

A) A new company is more likely to succeed if every founding member contributes equally to the company’s initial funding than if some members contribute more funds than others.

B) Some founding members of successful companies can provide both funding and skills in marketing, management, or technical matters.

C) New companies are more likely to succeed when their founders can provide adequate funding and skills in marketing, management, and technical abilities than when they must secure funding or skills from nonfounders.

D) Founders of a new company can more easily acquire marketing and management abilities than technical abilities.

E) A new company is more likely to succeed if its technical experts are also skilled in management and marketing than if they lack management or marketing skills.

Please explain your answers and start discussion
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks

"Pay attention to every detail"

Intern
Joined: 29 Dec 2012
Posts: 18
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 32

Re: When a group of people starts a company, the founders [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Dec 2013, 16:52
I go with "E".

C and E are best contenders. In C it is saying about non founders which is not at all mentioned in the argument.
Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 152
Location: India
WE: Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 24

Re: When a group of people starts a company, the founders [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Dec 2013, 00:48
schittuluri wrote:
I go with "E".
C and E are best contenders. In C it is saying about non founders which is not at all mentioned in the argument.

How can E be a contender?

Conculsion of the argument: companies founded by groups are more likely to succeed than companies founded by individuals.

E says a new company is likely to succeed if its technical experts are also skilled in management and marketing than if they lack management or marketing skills. Negating this answer choice would in no way hurt the conclusion that is mainly concerned with the likelihood of the success of companies founded by groups.

In contrast, choice C says that new companies are more likely to succeed when their founders can provide adequate funding and skills in marketing, management, and technical abilities than when they must secure funding or skills from nonfounders. Ah yes. Now this choice assures the success of new companies if their founders can provide adequate funding and skills in marketing, management and technical abilities. Moreover, if you negate this choice, the conclusion definitely falls apart. Hence this is the best choice.

Do you agree?
_________________

+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks

"Pay attention to every detail"

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1153
Location: United States
Followers: 236

Kudos [?]: 2567 [6] , given: 123

Re: When a group of people starts a company, the founders [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Dec 2013, 02:16
6
This post received
KUDOS
cssk wrote:
When a group of people starts a company, the founders usually serve as sources both of funding and of skills in marketing, management, and technical matters. It is unlikely that a single individual can both provide adequate funding and be skilled in marketing, management, and technical matters. Therefore, companies founded by groups are more likely to succeed than companies founded by individuals.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?

A) A new company is more likely to succeed if every founding member contributes equally to the company’s initial funding than if some members contribute more funds than others.

B) Some founding members of successful companies can provide both funding and skills in marketing, management, or technical matters.

C) New companies are more likely to succeed when their founders can provide adequate funding and skills in marketing, management, and technical abilities than when they must secure funding or skills from nonfounders.

D) Founders of a new company can more easily acquire marketing and management abilities than technical abilities.

E) A new company is more likely to succeed if its technical experts are also skilled in management and marketing than if they lack management or marketing skills.

Please explain your answers and start discussion

Nice defender assumption question.
First of all, when we see this kind of question, a correct answer is the one that could eliminate the weakness of a conclusion.

ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

Fact: When a group of people starts a company, the founders usually serve as sources both of funding and of skills in marketing, management, and technical matters.
Fact: It is unlikely that a single individual can both provide adequate funding and be skilled in marketing, management, and technical matters.
Conclusion: companies founded by groups are more likely to succeed than companies founded by individuals.

Pre-thinking: what if a single founder who only has funding can hire non-founder members who have skills in marketing, management and technical matters? Clearly, a company can be successful. <==This is a weakness of the conclusion.

Assumption: The defender assumption should eliminate the weakness above.
Thus, the assumption should be “it is likely that a company founded by an individual, who often hires non-founder members having skills in business, is less successful than a company founded by group of founders.

ANALYZE EACH ANSWER:

A) A new company is more likely to succeed if every founding member contributes equally to the company’s initial funding than if some members contribute more funds than others.
Wrong. The equal contribution does not help to bolster the conclusion. A can’t be an assumption.

B) Some founding members of successful companies can provide both funding and skills in marketing, management, or technical matters.
Wrong. B does not violate the conclusion. It’s true that some founding members can provide both funding and skills. But B does not help to elucidate why companies founded by groups are more likely to be successful than companies founded by individuals.

C) New companies are more likely to succeed when their founders can provide adequate funding and skills in marketing, management, and technical abilities than when they must secure funding or skills from non-founders.
Correct. C clearly ELIMINATES the weakness of the conclusion. C is the correct defender assumption.

D) Founders of a new company can more easily acquire marketing and management abilities than technical abilities.
Wrong. Nothing to compare here. D is out scope.

E) A new company is more likely to succeed if its technical experts are also skilled in management and marketing than if they lack management or marketing skills.
Wrong. Same error as in D. The comparison between each founding members does not help at all. E is not relevant.

Hope it helps a bit.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9289
Followers: 805

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Re: When a group of people starts a company, the founders [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 May 2015, 11:32
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: When a group of people starts a company, the founders   [#permalink] 10 May 2015, 11:32
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce 6 31 Dec 2012, 19:20
1 Start up Companies 3 25 Oct 2009, 07:58
69 When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce 54 11 Mar 2009, 03:55
When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce 10 29 Dec 2006, 00:15
When a company refuses to allow other companies to produce 18 15 Oct 2006, 11:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

When a group of people starts a company, the founders

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.