Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 Jun 2013, 00:11
Customize  |  Hide

When evidence of financial wrongdoing by an elected official

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Sep 2004
Posts: 259
Location: New York City, USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
When evidence of financial wrongdoing by an elected official [#permalink] New post 11 Mar 2006, 14:00
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
When evidence of financial wrongdoing by an elected official surfaces, it is the electorate who must decide whether the evidence warrants censuring him or ousting him from office.

(A) whether the evidence warrants censuring him or ousting him
(B) if there is evidence that warrants a censuring or an ousting him
(C) whether or not the evidence warrants censuring him or ousting him
(D) if there is evidence that warrants censuring him or ousting him
(E) if the evidence would warrants that he be censured or he be ousted

Pls explain.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 483
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - Evidence [#permalink] New post 11 Mar 2006, 14:07
its A
When we have to decide between two things, we should use wether. So now its boils down to A and C. C is out because wether or not is redundant.

vipin7um wrote:
When evidence of financial wrongdoing by an elected official surfaces, it is the electorate who must decide whether the evidence warrants censuring him or ousting him from office.

(A) whether the evidence warrants censuring him or ousting him
(B) if there is evidence that warrants a censuring or an ousting him
(C) whether or not the evidence warrants censuring him or ousting him
(D) if there is evidence that warrants censuring him or ousting him
(E) if the evidence would warrants that he be censured or he be ousted

Pls explain.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 634
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - Evidence [#permalink] New post 11 Mar 2006, 16:41
^ A ^

"whether" is preferred over "if" on deciding between two things. So B, D and E are out.

We dont need "or not" as in C.

(A) whether the evidence warrants censuring him or ousting him
(B) if there is evidence that warrants a censuring or an ousting him
(C) whether or not the evidence warrants censuring him or ousting him
(D) if there is evidence that warrants censuring him or ousting him
(E) if the evidence would warrants that he be censured or he be ousted
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5134
Location: Singapore
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 13 Mar 2006, 04:46
A is the best choice. No redundancy and properly uses 'whether'
  [#permalink] 13 Mar 2006, 04:46
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts On this issue, this state's elected officials ignored the shubhangi 4 28 Dec 2003, 18:10
New posts On this issue, this state's elected officials ignored the vivek_dj 4 05 Mar 2004, 12:42
New posts Fewer elected officials are supporting environment doloris 5 20 May 2005, 03:03
New posts On this issue, this state's elected officials ignored the vaivish1723 5 05 Jun 2009, 04:47
New posts When evidence of financial wrongdoing by an elected official TomB 2 28 Jul 2011, 11:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by

When evidence of financial wrongdoing by an elected official

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.